Back to @cricketwallah's profile

Cricketwallah engagement report

@cricketwallah - 680K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.009%
of 680K followers
Per impression
0.686%
8.8K views on a typical post
Reach
1.30%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
60
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 680K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.8K times each, and 0.686% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.4K interactions, about 90x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cricketwallah's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, Cricketwallah sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 202690x their median

    Don’t worry… the World Cup doesn’t matter. 🤡 The Asian Games are coming. Win a medal 🥇 there, and then we can start dreaming about LA 2028. Apparently, that’s enough to cover everything that went wrong at the World Cup. Women’s chief coach on holiday just before the World Cup — and the girls still fought their hearts out and exceeded expectations. Credit to the players. But where is the accountability? Do we really expect a team to perform at its best when the chief coach is away during the final phase of preparation? Men’s team loses to a top team → “It’s a learning experience.”
Beats an Asian team → “Great victory.”
Plays good hockey → “Good performance.” But here’s the uncomfortable question: Are we building a team to PLAY good hockey, or a team capable of WINNING against the best in the world? Stop hiding behind “learning”, “good hockey” and future tournaments. The World Cup is not a rehearsal.
It is the World Cup.😎 So who is going to ask the difficult questions?
Who is going to demand accountability?
And most importantly… Does anyone actually care?

    4.3K82914371207K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20269.2x their median

    Urooj Mumtaz talks about Pakistan's ongoing pace bowling issue https://t.co/YYTPSWWsKP

    478471415107K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20267.9x their median

    Bangladesh bowlers would test the best batting sides with quality pace, swing, seam snd spin. After being bundled out for 64 on the first morning, the splendid fightback showcased skill, spunk, ambition. Aus in dominant position but don’t write off B’desh just yet!

    448232015K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20266.5x their median

    33-year-old offie Saransh Jain wins Test cap. Kuldeep Yadav omitted from playing XI. Three left arm spinners was a luxury in any case, but Kuldeep’s slump, from match-winner to dispensable bowler was unexpected. With Suthar showing excellent form, Kuldeep’s Test future all uphill

    3591711217K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.5x their median

    Comprehensive win for India fashioned by a fantastic 10-wicket haul by Manav Suthar. India have made a strong start in this phase to make it to WTC final but a lot of hard work lies ahead

    14441011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20261.8x their median

    Congrats Zubin! https://t.co/qyguDVwD5i

    1052209.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20261.6x their median

    Devdutt Padikkal has flamboyance, style and panache and. More significantly,he blends this with sound technique, patience, determination. Two centuries in successive Tests suggests India may have found the man they were seeking for the no.3 spot https://t.co/J2dDBFT1g7

    852808.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    India have taken a vice-like grip in the Test. A with the last recognised batting pair in the middle, a rain-hit final day is Sri Lanka’s best hope to save the match https://t.co/8811dBYCHB

    214107.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    Devdutt Padikkal snd Manav asuthar were the two big gains for India in the Galle win as India look to get their bid to be in the WTC final back on track. Both are young but with fairly rich first class experience which sends out a pertinent message https://t.co/rXMoQS3ASy

    67105.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    The Right Excellent Sir Garfield Sobers/ My column on cricket for @newcriterion https://t.co/lMCTLLepbr

    610113K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 680K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.8K times each, and 0.686% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.4K interactions, about 90x its own typical post.

What is Cricketwallah's engagement rate on X?
Cricketwallah (@cricketwallah) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 680,205 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, Cricketwallah sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cricketwallah have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cricketwallah post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going