Back to @danadearmond's profile

Dana DeArmond engagement report

@danadearmond - 382K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.027%
of 382K followers
Per impression
0.501%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
5.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
103
interactions (median)
Saved
0.024%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 103 interactions against 382K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 3,810 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 0.501% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 16% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 37% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bigtits, #milf, #videocall.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #bigtits, #milf, #videocall.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dana DeArmond's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,810 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.027%, Dana DeArmond sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Mar 12, 202518x their median

    The cutest girl at the gym https://t.co/SAgcVTPNsb https://t.co/lj02eY61Ot

    1.7K76662707K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20268.5x their median

    Now taking cabana boy applications at https://t.co/SAgcVTPNsb https://t.co/LfF0Fvc6ST

    8233520022K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20266.3x their median

    What are you sniffing first? https://t.co/TIjxEToj7Z

    5993120026K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20265.4x their median

    Come back to bed https://t.co/SAgcVTPNsb https://t.co/nfURu3jKy5

    5192217024K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20265.2x their median

    PSA to “fans” don’t look for our personal information. Don’t text us, don’t call, don’t FaceTime, don’t mail stuff to our houses. It’s intrusive and incredibly creepy. We give you ample opportunity to interact with us on our platforms. Thinking that you’re going to have a clever little loophole by becoming a stalker is fucking unhinged. Grow some self awareness.

    4635321395K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.8x their median

    When to Disneyland to try to beat the valley heat and not only is it just as hot… it’s also humid. Fml https://t.co/ah5ascZKAq

    370138018K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20263.8x their median

    I’ve been feeding the kittens at @adrianachechik yard. I am the cat whisperer https://t.co/am4xma3B0S

    371611022K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20262.0x their median

    I’m having a really good pussy day. 🤗

    19657023K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20261.9x their median

    How is it that perez Hilton can be on TikTok butt ass naked with his cock out trying to kill himself and I get my live streams restricted for wearing a tank top (flagged as body exposure/sexy)

    173711028K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    I think it’s so crazy that men will have fully gray hair and a dad bod try to message me “Do you like hot fit younger guys?” Sir, you look like my grandpa.

    13138014K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bigtits#milf#videocall

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 103 interactions against 382K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 3,810 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 0.501% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 16% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 37% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bigtits, #milf, #videocall.

What is Dana DeArmond's engagement rate on X?
Dana DeArmond (@danadearmond) has an engagement rate of 0.027%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 381,512 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.027%, Dana DeArmond sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @danadearmond have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,810 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @danadearmond post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going