Back to @danghentschel's profile

dan hentschel engagement report

@danghentschel - 422K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.13%
of 422K followers
Per impression
5.22%
91K views on a typical post
Reach
21.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.281%
257 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.7/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 4.8K interactions against 422K followers, an engagement rate of 1.13%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 91K times each, and 5.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 18% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 77K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

dan hentschel's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.13%, dan hentschel sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99154.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,996 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 96,714 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile154.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%54K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%56K
04:00 UTC-6%45K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%82K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%99K
14:00 UTC-3%102K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%103K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%89K
19:00 UTC-2%84K
20:00 UTC-1%78K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%54K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%239K
Monday0%303K
Tuesday-3%305K
Wednesday-1%259K
Thursday-2%251K
Friday-3%260K
Saturday+3%234K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 20, 202616x their median

    https://t.co/94W20RIuTI

    72K4.2K100131818K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20267.2x their median

    God gave me a supernatural ability to look into someone's eyes and instantly know if they have been molested.

    32K2.0K79124436K viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 20265.6x their median

    Sexuality is what makes us human. There is no reason why it shouldn't be integrated into the workplace.

    25K1.1K82116553K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20263.1x their median

    https://t.co/oGoBbVbwOU

    14K6027741193K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20263.0x their median

    Check out the new vid ⬇️ https://t.co/otoHxdWAQ8

    13K6021081871.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.7x their median

    Something for my gay fans https://t.co/Fpf7RYIYtr

    12K1.1K7472318K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.6x their median

    https://t.co/hArjLol7Hb

    12K5025847135K viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 20262.4x their median

    My daughter and her friends called my inventions "gay," and the R word. They're wrong.

    11K4402317175K viewsView on X
  • Jun 9, 20262.3x their median

    Yup - Everyone at my startup has seen my penis.

    10K5243313136K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 20262.2x their median

    Recently hired a gay employee. Trying to speak his "language" has been a fun and eye-opening experience. https://t.co/0BakCUL7Bl

    9.9K4311714146K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.8K interactions against 422K followers, an engagement rate of 1.13%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 91K times each, and 5.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 18% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 77K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

What is dan hentschel's engagement rate on X?
dan hentschel (@danghentschel) has an engagement rate of 1.13%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 422,334 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.13%, dan hentschel sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @danghentschel have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @danghentschel post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going