Del Bigtree engagement report
@delbigtree - 388K followers on X
Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 388K followers, an engagement rate of 0.587%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 3,792 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 7.12% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post.
Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Del Bigtree's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,792 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.587%, Del Bigtree sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.434% to 2.10%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.434% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 54K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 79K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 87K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 98K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 99K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 75K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 58K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 232K |
| Monday | 0% | 290K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 281K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 252K |
| Thursday | -2% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 254K |
| Saturday | +3% | 228K |
Best tweets
- Aug 13, 20266.0x their median
I asked Professor Angus Dalgleish (Professor of Oncology at St. George's University of London and one of the world's leading cancer immunologists) whether he believed the COVID vaccine was creating turbo cancers. He said yes, and that after reviewing over 400 publications on the subject the mechanisms are so numerous it's surprising there aren't more cases than we're already seeing. He walked me through several of them. The vaccine suppresses T-cell response and switches the antibody system into a tolerant state, essentially converting the body into a condition similar to transplant readiness, where it won't reject a foreign organ and won't reject a cancer. It can integrate into the genome next to oncogenes. The Pfizer vaccine contains SV40, a known oncogene. It interferes with dozens of metabolic and signaling pathways that, when overstimulated, drive cancer and don't switch off. The mechanism that concerns him most is the vaccine's ability to bind and silence tumor suppressor genes like p53 and BRCA. If someone already carries a natural mutation in one of those genes, their cancer arrives 20 or 30 years earlier than it otherwise would have. Interfere with more than two or three of these pathways simultaneously and you pull it forward even further, and when the cancer does arrive, the brakes are gone. In nearly 40 years he said he's never seen anything like the presentations he's seeing now. He said we should ban all mRNA vaccines, because they aren't vaccines, they're gene therapies, and giving them to children can interfere with their genome for the rest of their lives. He called allowing these products to go into young people, when we knew none of them were at risk of dying, criminal medical negligence and the crime of the century.
- Aug 6, 20264.2x their median
Twenty-five years of working with RNA taught one medical biochemist three things you should never do with it: modify it, stabilize it, or inject it. The mRNA COVID vaccine did all three, and I asked him to walk me through why that's important. He described RNA as the blueprint of a cell, the instructions it uses to translate into proteins that do the actual work. If that blueprint is modified mid-construction, you don't get the protein you designed. You get fragments, and he said that's what is being produced in the majority of cases after the modification and injection of the spike protein RNA. The greater danger is reverse transcription. When the RNA template persists in the cell long enough, it can be converted back into DNA. A cell with more DNA than it should have is something every physician recognizes. It's called aneuploidy, and it's a transformed cell. It's cancer. He told me that, in his assessment as someone who has spent his career studying exactly this biology, the impact of all of this is beyond a disaster.
- Jul 27, 20263.7x their median
I have spent ten years as a journalist investigating one product and one claim - Vaccines are safe and effective. That is what we're told. I've only ever asked one question: how did they determine they were safe? And as my investigation shows, they aren't. I used to believe vaccine injury was rare. I now believe vaccines injure and kill more people than the diseases we vaccinate for. Here's what medicine wants you to think about. Before vaccination, measles killed about 400 to 500 people a year in America, a death rate of roughly one per 500,000. "Don't you care about those 500?", they ask. But studies have shown that a child who catches measles has a 10% reduction in future heart disease. A million people die every year from heart disease in America. Reduce that by 10 to 20% and you've just saved 100,000 people by letting them catch measles. They don't want to talk about those 100,000. Measles in childhood for women produces a 50% reduction in cervical cancer, a 20% reduction in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and a 60% reduction in Hodgkin's lymphoma. Our immune system works exactly like working out with weights. It gets stronger by being challenged. We need these diseases to prime it for future disease. And by vaccinating the way we do, we are making our species weaker and weaker. Our immune systems can't keep up. They are now attacking our own bodies. Science has made a mistake.
- Aug 10, 20263.1x their median
Actions speak louder than words. Today, President Trump signed an Executive Order reshaping the childhood vaccine guidelines down to 11 core vaccinations. Given that the health of our children and has been going in the wrong direction while our vaccine schedule has continued to increase, I’m very glad to see our President has made this a priority and exercised common sense measures to get us out of this mess. Is it everything I want? No. Is it a step in the right direction? Absolutely yes. Has any other President before him given this one moment of their time? You know the answer to that. Change is here, and more is coming.
- Jul 22, 20263.1x their median
Andrew Bridgen told me that in January 2022 someone offered him anything he wanted in the world to shut up about the vaccines, and they put it in a text message because they had apparently never had anyone turn it down before. He assumed they had made that offer to a lot of elected representatives and it had always worked. He said no. By November of that year he was having conversations with colleagues he had worked alongside for twelve years, and one of them told him privately that he thought Andrew was right. This was a man who had taken two Pfizers, gone to the gym, had chest pains, taken himself to the hospital, and been told he had already had two heart attacks. Andrew asked him to stand with him anyway, to protect the children, and the man said no. Andrew still doesn't fully know why. Some leverage they had on him, he assumed, something the man wasn't going to share. He told me he didn't go into politics to allow children to be murdered or injured when he could do something about it, and that was his answer when they came to him with everything he could want. They couldn't believe anyone would refuse. Can't believe the hubris? Believe it... @ABridgen
- Jul 24, 20262.5x their median
The vaccine rate in England was about 70%, almost identical to America's. That means that 30% of the population, living under the largest propaganda machine we have ever seen, looked at all of it and said no. Those are not apathetic people! Those are people who stood their ground. And then consider how many of the 70% did it under duress, under threat of losing their jobs. If half of them didn't want to, the picture changes considerably. Andrew reminded me that democracy comes from the Greek: demos, the people, kratos, the power. Power to the people. He asked how powerful the people of Europe feel right now, and the answer is they're scared of their governments. When people fear their government, that is tyranny. When governments fear their people, that is liberty. He said he's confident we're going to get there. There are a lot of us and very few of them, and they are not, he said, intrinsically brave people. I'm looking forward to continuing to build alongside people like @ABridgen .
- Aug 25, 20262.2x their median
I believe mandatory vaccines are the defining issue of our lifetime. Control over what goes into your body and your children's bodies is control over your freedom itself. There's no freedom left once that decision isn't yours to make anymore. Bill Gates, Barack Obama, Klaus Schwab, the WHO, the World Economic Forum have all said the world needs a smaller population, and all of them have said vaccination is the answer. That is literally what they've said. Here's my hypothesis. A vaccine passport that becomes so routine we stop asking what it's really tracking: your income, your vote, your health. Ask yourself if the person ahead of you in that line is getting what the billionaire behind you is getting, especially if you're young and poor and out of work. I believe this was never just about disease. I believe it was about who gets to have children, who stays healthy, and who lives a long life. Thats the kind of power authoritarians have always wanted over the rest of us.
- Aug 14, 20261.5x their median
Twenty years of coronavirus vaccine research and not one of them ever worked. That was the question Professor Angus Dalgleish and his colleagues set out to answer, and they answered it before the world had ever heard the words mRNA vaccine. I asked him what they found. Coronaviruses change too fast, he said. A wave lasts two to three months and then it's gone, replaced by something different enough that the old antibodies don't recognize it anymore. In the animal models, that mismatch didn't just fail to protect, it made things worse. The antibodies latched onto the new virus without killing it, and instead of blocking the infection, they helped it along. Every model showed the same pattern. In primates, Dalgleish said, it killed them. That data existed. It was never tested in primates before it went into human arms. When he and his colleagues raised it, they were told the greater good mattered more than the risk. I asked him if he could believe how many of his own colleagues went along with it anyway. He said he was the only one who screamed.
- Aug 4, 2026
At CPAC Great Britain I spoke with Dr. Maria Hubmer-Mogg, an Austrian physician who walked away from her medical board the day her country announced mandatory vaccination and hasn't been able to practice medicine since. What she described matched what I had heard in every country I visited. Doctors were using hydroxychloroquine, following the work Didier Raoult had done on SARS in France, and they were reporting nearly 100% success rates. They went to their health departments and said we have a solution. Everywhere - Japan, Germany, Poland, Italy, America, Austria - the answer was cease and desist. And when they asked about running a study to prove it, they were told if you do a study, we will take your license. When @PierreKory testified about ivermectin in December 2020, Dr. Hubmer-Mogg and her colleagues concluded it worked and began using it. The medical board started sending letters, then came the lawsuits, and then the day Austria announced mandatory vaccination she said she was done. She stepped down from the medical board that same day because she was not going to work for a corrupt institution, and from that point forward she could no longer practice medicine.
- Jul 23, 2026
Andrew Bridgen believes the UK is probably the most corrupt country in the world. He said they've been doing it a long time, apparently very well. Every institution meant to protect the public - politics, corporations, media, the judiciary, the police - is a barrel. Not every apple is rotten. But every apple at the top of every barrel is rotten, and rising to the top requires a willingness to rot. (Sound familiar??) Compromise is the price of promotion, because a compromised person can be controlled. And when a corrupt leader moves on, their last job is making sure whoever follows is at least as corrupt. Otherwise the gig's up. Things aren't much different across the pond than they are here...
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 388K followers, an engagement rate of 0.587%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 3,792 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 7.12% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post.
- What is Del Bigtree's engagement rate on X?
- Del Bigtree (@delbigtree) has an engagement rate of 0.587%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 388,375 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.587%, Del Bigtree sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @delbigtree have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,792 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @delbigtree post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.