Back to @demori's profile

Leandro Demori engagement report

@demori - 420K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.01%
of 420K followers
Per impression
0.642%
6.3K views on a typical post
Reach
1.50%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
40
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 420K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.3K times each, and 0.642% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.1K interactions, about 178x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Leandro Demori's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, Leandro Demori sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 2026178x their median

    A FAKE NEWS SOBRE HADDAD TER MANDADO MATAR LUCIANO HANG ESCONDE MUITO MAIS DO QUE PARECE https://t.co/tAKtzaCrlP

    5.5K1.5K793181K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202684x their median

    A prefeitura de São Paulo pagou R$ 3,7 milhões para patrocinar um evento de rugby no Pacaembu, hoje. A justificativa era colocar 25 mil pessoas no estádio, sendo 20% de turistas. Pelas imagens, não tinha 4 mil pessoas (chutaria 3 mil) Gestão Ricardo Nunes rasga dinheiro no esporte. Dava para bancar um ano de uma equipe profissional.

    3.0K2548627114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202648x their median

    Arrogância ou delírio de superioridade? Renan Santos resolveu explicar para Minas Gerais que o eleitor está errado. Chamou de “surto coletivo” o desempenho de Cleitinho nas pesquisas e, quando um jornalista lembrou que Cleitinho tem 35% enquanto ele mal aparece nacionalmente, Renan perdeu a linha. Chamou o repórter de “baixa inteligência”, falou em “burro” e precisou ser contido pelo moderador. O candidato que promete enfrentar a velha política parece não conseguir enfrentar uma simples pergunta.

    1.2K9256048352K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202621x their median

    TEM PROGRAMA NOVO NO AR! https://t.co/m5PU4X7qem

    71611612415K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202617x their median

    Propaganda de evento religioso no intervalo da entrevista do Flavio Bolsonaro no Jornal Nacional. Igreja do Juanribe Pagliarin, notório apoiador do Jair. O que chamou atenção foi a narração que veio em seguida ao anúncio do evento: “Apoio: Globo.” https://t.co/qL5nLv8gvM

    54611111515K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.1x their median

    🚀 Baixe meus vídeos curtos de 1 minuto sobre política pra espalhar no zap! https://t.co/YGGIzkPQwJ August 26, 2026 at 07:00AM

    7610006.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.9x their median

    🚀 Baixe meus vídeos curtos de 1 minuto sobre política pra espalhar no zap! https://t.co/Zg2ZZUQ14a August 27, 2026 at 07:00AM

    679005.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.7x their median

    🔴 EM VÍDEO! Siga meu canal lá no You Tube. Programas ao vivo e vídeos todos os dias. https://t.co/1eFGhElKv1

    608008.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    🚀 Baixe meus vídeos curtos de 1 minuto sobre política pra espalhar no zap! https://t.co/8U62JUHooj August 30, 2026 at 07:00AM

    483204.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    🔴 EM VÍDEO! Siga meu canal lá no You Tube. Programas ao vivo e vídeos todos os dias. https://t.co/1eFGhElKv1

    374107.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 420K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.3K times each, and 0.642% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.1K interactions, about 178x its own typical post.

What is Leandro Demori's engagement rate on X?
Leandro Demori (@demori) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 420,014 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, Leandro Demori sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @demori have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @demori post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going