Back to @drdrew's profile

Dr. Drew engagement report

@drdrew - 2.5M followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.004%
of 2.5M followers
Per impression
0.215%
47K views on a typical post
Reach
1.93%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
102
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.07/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 102 interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 0.215% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 73% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 424x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #foxnews, #onenationfnc.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #foxnews, #onenationfnc.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dr. Drew's engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 21% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Dr. Drew sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.432%
p902.10%
p99161.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,378 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.432%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile161.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 30, 2026424x their median

    Please share this with everyone. Let’s never listen to these liars ever again. I guess CNN doesn’t need Sanjay to be a useful idiot anymore https://t.co/XawCqUEWUB

    31K10K962548853K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 2026399x their median

    Joe Rogan just WENT OFF on CNN and the mainstream media for ignoring the Fauci hearing and claiming Americans do not care. “If you don’t think that’s news, you’re out of your mind.” “You shouldn’t be calling yourself the news.” “You’re just a propaganda arm for whatever pharmaceutical company is paying for your advertisements.” “This is a big issue for most Americans who went through that.” “People who lost their jobs.” “People who had to take a vaccine in order to go to work and got sick from it.” “People couldn't fly, they couldn't travel, they were vilified.” “They were called plague rats because they were questioning these things.” “You’re not supposed to be the arbiters of what we can and can’t concentrate on.” “That’s ridiculous.” @joerogan

    33K7.5K475198637K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 2026100x their median

    I just sent letters to former FDA officials and Anthony Fauci to appear voluntarily for transcribed interviews. The American people deserve answers, and I will issue subpoenas if they do not appear voluntarily. https://t.co/HQ3ruowgMQ

    7.1K1.7K1.3K132242K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202645x their median

    "My pronouns are Pay / Me," ex NBA player Royce White tells me, of his brave & stunning journey to become a woman and join the 2027 WNBA draft. Now named Royesha White, the athlete is challenging the WNBA to face the controversy over biological men in women's sports – and finally define what a "woman" really is. If the WNBA denies @Highway_30 the chance to play with his chosen gender, Royce says it would be "tantamount to genocide." His plan is to hold the league to the values it publicly claims - tolerance, inclusiveness, inclusivity - and says support for his bid has been strong privately even if public backing is "still a work in progress." White declared for the 2027 WNBA Draft soon after former NBA center @EnesFreedom announced the same intention. The WNBA collective bargaining agreement states that only players who are women are eligible to play, but the league has not yet published a definition of who qualifies. "I'm certainly a Christian still," says Royce, but "sometimes identifying as a black trans lesbian. For basketball purposes." From the August 14, 2026 episode of @AskDrDrew w/ @DrKellyVictory

    3.9K51015040129K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202641x their median

    SO PROUD. Nick and Evan are doing their very first in store signing. Wow. https://t.co/yl4QegdriN

    3.9K15713611138K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 202638x their median

    Don’t forget to tune in TODAY at 8:30AM Eastern. https://t.co/xjWeR8VLWy

    2.5K753505101322K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 202625x their median

    Remember when Dr. Fauci televised his COVID-19 vaccination? A short time later, part of his lung died. “He never told anybody,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reported to Laura Ingraham this week. “He got treated for it privately by the best doctors in America. At the same time he was telling everybody that was not an adverse event.” A pulmonary infarction is caused by a clot that travels to the lung. It is potentially life threatening. It is something a health authority should tell people about, especially when mRNA vaccines for COVID are considered to potentially be related to clotting pathology. It's just one of the secrets buried in Fauci's diary. @DrKellyVictory and I reviewed Fauci's private writings and key sections of more than 1100 pages released by @SenRandPaul this week. December 22, 2020: Fauci rolls up his sleeve on camera at the NIH Clinical Center and tells the country he has "extreme confidence in the safety and the efficacy of this vaccine." June 19, 2021: Fauci's diary records a pulmonary infarction found on a CT scan, and his doctors start him on Eliquis, a blood thinner. You may recall that in June of 2021, my interviews with @SteveKirsch and @Zev_DR were heavily censored on social media. I received multiple strikes on YouTube and was demonetized for almost a year. @AlexBerenson was even banned by Twitter after warning about mRNA side effects. And after @ElonMusk released the Twitter Files, it became crystal clear that all along, the government had been pressuring private companies to deplatform dissenting voices. This means at the same time Fauci was experiencing health issues after a COVID vaccination, the Biden administration was actively suppressing physicians who were warning about those same health issues.

    1.9K5585226128K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 202619x their median

    This https://t.co/KpLksznuPI

    1.5K3415324110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 202614x their median

    “Monoclonal antibodies? Not for your kind.” Real science sidelined, Dr. Drew hit with YouTube strikes, channel locks, and shadowbans for saying hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Dr. McCullough permanently banned on X and lost board certifications. Full episode at https://t.co/luoGWCIGCR.

    1.2K21240273K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 202611x their median

    There's a loophole in Biden's pardon of Dr. Fauci: it only covers him at the federal level, NOT state. I asked @MichaelGatesESQ point-blank: when he's elected as Attorney General of California, will CA launch its own investigation of Dr. Fauci?

    88516557594K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#foxnews#onenationfnc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 102 interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 0.215% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 73% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 424x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #foxnews, #onenationfnc.

What is Dr. Drew's engagement rate on X?
Dr. Drew (@drdrew) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,461,251 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Dr. Drew sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @drdrew have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @drdrew post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going