Back to @dumbassgenius's profile

Rick G. Rosner engagement report

@dumbassgenius - 759K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.019%
of 759K followers
Per impression
3.27%
4.4K views on a typical post
Reach
0.58%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
144
interactions (median)
Saved
0.091%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.6/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 144 interactions against 759K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.4K times each, and 3.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.8K interactions, about 40x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #maga, #newsweek.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #maga, #newsweek.

Compared with accounts its own size

Rick G. Rosner's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.019%, Rick G. Rosner sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.437%
p902.10%
p99159.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,350 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,576 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.437%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-4%100K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-3%93K
18:00 UTC-2%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%76K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%235K
Monday0%296K
Tuesday-3%292K
Wednesday-1%254K
Thursday-2%248K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 20, 202640x their median

    FOX BUSINESS: What are you doing to bring beef prices down? BROOKE ROLLINS: Listen, what we are facing in America today is the direct result of the previous administration https://t.co/74AiUV0xbj

    3.1K5881.6K510920K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202629x their median

    Let me tell you what didn't happen today. The Supreme Court did NOT rule that Trump's election order is legal. Six justices didn't sign their names to anything. They issued a short unsigned order saying the states sued too early. Now...here's what that little procedural shrug actually does. It UNFREEZES a directive telling the Post Office to deliver your mail ballot ONLY if your name appears on a federal list. A list Homeland Security builds. From databases you have NEVER SEEN...and cannot correct. Read that again. A clerk's typo in Washington...and your ballot never arrives. No hearing. No notice. It just…doesn't come.| States have to comply 60 days out. That's early September. The election is November 3. And...the fraud this is stopping? Researchers keep looking. They keep finding almost NONE. The President voted by mail in Florida this year. Nobody outlawed your vote today. Something QUIETER happened. The machinery that delivers your vote got moved OUT of your state's hands...and into a FEDERAL DATABASE...and you were told to sue later. Later...is November 4.

    2.8K1.2K963588K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 201716x their median

    (THREAD) Growing Up w/ the World's 2nd-Highest IQ: A Memoir

    1.3K618210100View on X
  • Aug 20, 202612x their median

    Navy weighs renaming carrier slated to honor Black war hero, potentially switching it to Trump https://t.co/IcJASIkPGP

    900354270138164K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202611x their median

    Washington Post begins its Sunday edition with a focus on Trump’s health https://t.co/47lzWBXi1I https://t.co/fd1US28ozi

    1.1K2921543172K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20268.2x their median

    FOX BUSINESS: How do you reassure voters that Republicans are working to help their wallets? SEN. DAVE McCORMICK: The starting point is, listen, there is no doubt the American people, working families, are much better off under the Trump administration than they were under the Biden administration

    560138379104123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.8x their median

    Q: Why do you love Donald Trump so much? Trump supporter: First of all he's a real person. He's a businessman. Country is a business and he's running it like a business. Q: How is a country a business? TS: I don't know how to answer that. Q: What's Trump's greatest accomplishment in the second term. TS: Getting elected.

    8201441134793K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20266.4x their median

    Markwayne Mullin: "You have a Biden administration that is failing the American people" (Of course he’s blaming Joe Biden)🙄 https://t.co/i7rPraSWQk

    4381492725819K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20265.2x their median

    Karl: "Do you still think gas will be below $2 a gallon by the end of the summer?" Gov. Greg Abbott: "If the president maintains the current trajectory that he's on right now, they should be." https://t.co/ZXG2MNM0wJ

    2445637771101K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20264.9x their median

    Watters: Deep down, in their loins, they, they want a husband. My advice for them. Get off dating apps. Work is a great place to find a spouse https://t.co/DNRDZwr6wW

    2903130379130K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#maga#newsweek

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 144 interactions against 759K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.4K times each, and 3.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.8K interactions, about 40x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #maga, #newsweek.

What is Rick G. Rosner's engagement rate on X?
Rick G. Rosner (@dumbassgenius) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 759,298 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.019%, Rick G. Rosner sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @dumbassgenius have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @dumbassgenius post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going