Back to @eduguim's profile

Blog da Cidadania engagement report

@eduguim - 97K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.293%
of 97K followers
Per impression
12.2%
2.3K views on a typical post
Reach
2.40%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
284
interactions (median)
Saved
0.172%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 284 interactions against 97K followers, an engagement rate of 0.293%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.3K times each, and 12.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 65% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 7.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Blog da Cidadania's engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.293%, Blog da Cidadania sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 19, 20267.1x their median

    A extrema direita histórica não foi Maluf como muitos pensam. O extremista de direita é aquele reacionário que julga o outro pelo titulo que ostenta. Enéas foi o esgoto que emergiu da classe dominante racista e preconceituosa. Enéas era um capitão do mato. https://t.co/Q6VBp0fScx

    1.8K135581353K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.4x their median

    STF acusa Mendonça de blindar Flavio e atacar Lula Tribunal questiona Mendonça por deixar vazar informações sobre filho de Lula e omitir as relações escandalosas entre Flávio e Vorcaro https://t.co/ruaNofpa03 https://t.co/sNQ7LhyHOV

    1.3K49440157.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.9x their median

    O que explica o Datafolha positivo para Lula é que o Brasil tem memória de 37 anos de armações da midia e das direitas contra ele em períodos eleitorais. Lembro de 1989 como se fosse ontem, fascistas desgraçados!!!

    9131791335.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20263.1x their median

    Metrópoles falsifica conversa de “Lulinha” e “Careca do INSS” Site do ex-presidiário Luiz Estevão inventa que Fábio Luís, filho de Lula disse ao “Careca do INSS” que o “futuro” de ambos seria “a Suíça” https://t.co/BgK2M7g0Ra https://t.co/6vzV953Jy7

    602241261713K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.0x their median

    Datafolha permite inferir que a sociedade percebeu que ataques da mídia ao filho de Lula visam blindar o filho de Bolsonaro

    722109553.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.6x their median

    Hoje, dois dos principais aliados de Flávio Bolsonaro - os ex-deputados do Rio, TH Joias e Rodrigo Bacellar - se tornaram réus. Pq? Por vazarem informações sigilosas para o Comando Vermelho, segunda maior facção do crime organizado do país. E aí, Flávio? Algo a declarar? https://t.co/iRQ9W1BGxI

    493233444.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.5x their median

    PGR vê má-fé da PF (de Mendonça) contra “Lulinha” Passou batida grave denúncia do procurador-geral da República contra delegados da PF que atuam no gabinete do Terrivelmente Evangélico https://t.co/ttwN7r6uWy https://t.co/JaI21b0kcl

    476214572.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.0x their median

    Mendonça e Fachin engavetam “Dark Horse” Terrivelmente Evangélico e Edson “Fachin é nosso” engavetam a investigação e megaescândalo começa a cair no esquecimento. https://t.co/b0W6NVgay4 https://t.co/oqXKMpaFhD

    366179452.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20261.9x their median

    Mais uma uma mentira cai por terra. https://t.co/lVHI8EeTiI

    3611731076.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20261.8x their median

    Como Mendonça foi possível? Eduardo Guimarães Em Janeiro deste ano, pressões contra o ministro Dias Toffoli acabaram fazendo com que ele abrisse mão da relatoria do caso Master, que acabou entregue a André Mendonça. Toffoli era acusado de ter estabelecido uma “guerra contra a PF” por ter determinado que as provas da investigação ficassem em posse da Procuradoria Geral da República. Pesou também, para a perda de relatoria, o fato de que um fundo ligado ao Master tivesse adquirido, no ano anterior, cotas de um empreendimento hoteleiro da família Toffoli. Mendonça, porém, já mostrou, de saída, o que começaria a fazer a partir de 16 de dezembro de 2021, quando assumiu a cadeira no STF na condição de “10% de Jair Bolsonaro”. Sua primeira decisão foi alijar o comando da PF das investigações do caso Master. O ministro “Terrivelmente Evangélico” nunca decepcionou (o bolsonarismo). TODAS as suas decisões e votos no Supremo, desde então, foram favoráveis ao seu patrono, Jair Bolsonaro, ou a aliados e parentes dele. T-O-D-A-S. Mas nada jamais se comparou ao que ele passaria a fazer após ser incensado pela mídia, pelas direitas e, pasmem, por amplos setores da esquerda. Ele seria “isento e ponderado”, segundo a lenda. O que se seguiu foi um fenômeno absolutamente inexplicável. A mídia, as direitas e a esquerda, sabe-se lá por que, ajudaram-no a acumular as relatorias dos casos Master e INSS e, depois a relatoria dos casos Dark Horse e “Lulinha”. Como deveria ser claro para qualquer um que entendesse minimamente de política e que não tivesse interesse nas manipulações terrivelmente revoltantes do ministro terrivelmente cara-de-pau, ele engavetou Master, INSS e Dark Horse e, desde então, desencadeou uma avalanche de vazamentos dos inquéritos vazios que instaurou contra o filho do presidente da República. Como foi possível alguém tão comprometido com o pior governante que o Brasil já teve ser alçado à posição de controle das investigações mais importantes da República? Ou melhor: como foi possível que TODOS se enganassem tanto sobre Mendonça e ignorassem apelos desesperados de uns poucos (como este que escreve) para abrirem os olhos?

    3641401474.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 284 interactions against 97K followers, an engagement rate of 0.293%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.3K times each, and 12.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 65% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 7.1x its own typical post.

What is Blog da Cidadania's engagement rate on X?
Blog da Cidadania (@eduguim) has an engagement rate of 0.293%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 96,775 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.293%, Blog da Cidadania sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @eduguim have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @eduguim post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going