Back to @eiei_1m's profile

Noonim EiEi💊āļ—āļ§āļīāļ•āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡ āļ™āļ­āļāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ›āļĨāļ­āļĄ!! 1M engagement report

@eiei_1m - 1.2M followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.015%
of 1.2M followers
Per impression
0.447%
43K views on a typical post
Reach
3.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
190
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 190 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 0.447% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 131x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #āđ€āļ‡āļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™.

Compared with accounts its own size

Noonim EiEi💊āļ—āļ§āļīāļ•āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡ āļ™āļ­āļāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ›āļĨāļ­āļĄ!! 1M's engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, Noonim EiEi💊āļ—āļ§āļīāļ•āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡ āļ™āļ­āļāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ›āļĨāļ­āļĄ!! 1M sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Feb 18, 2022131x their median

    āđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļŦāļĢāļ­āļāļ—āđˆāļēāđ€āļ”āđ‡ āļ”..... āļĄāļĩāđ€āđ€āļ•āđˆāļ—āđˆāļēāļ—āļĩāđ€āļŠāļĢāđ‡ āļˆāđ„āļ›āļžāļĢāđ‰āļ­āļĄāļāļąāļ™ðŸĪĪðŸ˜ģðŸ˜ą https://t.co/DzDZgRpVi6

    22K1.5K1.6K46View on X
  • Aug 6, 20269.5x their median

    āđ€āļĢāļēāđ„āļĄāđˆāđƒāļŠāđˆāđ€āļ”āđ‡āļāļ­āļĄāļĄāļ·āļ­āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āļ™āļ° āđ€āļĢāļēāđ‚āļ•āļžāļ­āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ­āļĄāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļ­āļ·āđˆāļ™āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āļ­āļ°ðŸ˜‚😂 https://t.co/HrbBGnHCNX

    1.7K5129164K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20265.3x their median

    #āļ•āļ·āđˆāļ™āļĄāļēāļāđ‡āđ€āļ‡āļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™ https://t.co/TONaBZjkeD

    9393033043K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20264.1x their median

    😘 https://t.co/FWz9MXixxv

    7421429035K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20263.4x their median

    ðŸĨ° https://t.co/fMI1ALzSfZ

    6091912177K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20263.2x their median

    😘 https://t.co/7FinbGlWp1

    5811418140K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.2x their median

    āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļŠāļĩāļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡ " āļāļąāļ›āļ•āļąāļ™ " āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡ "Yes's " āļāļąāļ™ āļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļąāļšāđ€āļĢāļē ^^ https://t.co/kX5CjRDLR5

    5871411134K viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 20263.1x their median

    āđ€āļĒāđ‰āļ”āļˆāļ™āđ€āļ•āļĩāļĒāļ‡āļŦāļąāļ....āļžāļĩāđˆāļĒāļąāļ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāļĢāļąāļāļŦāļ™āļđāļ­āļĩāļāļŦāļĢāļ­ðŸ˜˜ https://t.co/d9n4jrNMs2

    5491517119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20263.0x their median

    āļˆāļđāļšāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ›āļēāļ āļ—āļģāđ„āļĄāđ€āđ€āļ‰āļ°āļ—āļĩāđˆāļāļĩ ðŸĪĪ https://t.co/246aRyLRgu

    5341422039K viewsView on X
  • Jun 9, 20262.6x their median

    🐇āļĢāļąāļšāđ€āđ€āļĄāđˆāļāļĢāļ°āļ•āđˆāļēāļĒ āđ„āļ›āđ€āļĨāļĩāđ‰āļĒāļ‡āļŠāļąāļāļ•āļąāļ§āļĄāļąāđ‰āļĒāļ„āđˆāļ°.... https://t.co/aepJm5RRfn

    4611417016K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#āđ€āļ‡āļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 190 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 0.447% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 131x its own typical post.

What is Noonim EiEi💊āļ—āļ§āļīāļ•āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡ āļ™āļ­āļāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ›āļĨāļ­āļĄ!! 1M's engagement rate on X?
Noonim EiEi💊āļ—āļ§āļīāļ•āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡ āļ™āļ­āļāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ›āļĨāļ­āļĄ!! 1M (@eiei_1m) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,243,782 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, Noonim EiEi💊āļ—āļ§āļīāļ•āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡ āļ™āļ­āļāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ›āļĨāļ­āļĄ!! 1M sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @eiei_1m have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @eiei_1m post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going