Back to @el_artificis's profile

Artificis Gooner engagement report

@el_artificis - 102K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.018%
of 102K followers
Per impression
0.115%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
15.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
18
interactions (median)
Saved
0.006%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.7/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 102K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.115% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 2156x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Artificis Gooner's engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 6% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.018%, Artificis Gooner sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 18, 20262156x their median

    https://t.co/Opsb5Uchbl

    32K6.9K1302201.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20261949x their median

    Chile viendo como terremotea en todos lados menos acá https://t.co/XKfSN1YY9e

    32K2.9K147208356K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20261293x their median

    https://t.co/GqXcHryZCk

    19K3.7K6492915K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 2026948x their median

    Opening Grindr when you're bored is literally just checking an empty fridge over and over, hoping new options magically showed up.

    16K1.2K116104425K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2026718x their median

    Cómo voy a ser de Talca. https://t.co/n2hTK9BvgD

    12K1.1K641451.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 202654x their median

    Mientras que el gobierno dilata el tema de BTS, en el congreso siguen aprobando puras webadas que no benefician a ningún chileno.

    7731877015K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202641x their median

    🔴 Una pregunta incómoda para Natalia Duco en base a registros: Los registros de la Ley del Lobby muestran que el 27 de marzo el Ministerio del Deporte ya se había reunido con la productora para analizar la disponibilidad del estadio y le pidió presentar un plan de mitigación. Si el Gobierno conocía el proyecto desde marzo, ¿por qué la decisión definitiva llegó cuando las entradas ya estaban vendidas y miles de personas habían gastado dinero en viajes y alojamiento? Esa es la pregunta que sigue sin respuesta.

    4632643112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20266.4x their median

    Que manera de follar hoy... un trio y luego mi pololo insaciable 🤤

    11014017K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 20263.8x their median

    Que rico organizar algo así

    74122026K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20264.6x their median

    Que rico me huele la tula

    7804017K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 102K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.115% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 2156x its own typical post.

What is Artificis Gooner's engagement rate on X?
Artificis Gooner (@el_artificis) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 102,128 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.018%, Artificis Gooner sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @el_artificis have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @el_artificis post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going