Back to @eliseowo_'s profile

πšŽπš•πš’πšœπšŽβ™‘ engagement report

@eliseowo_ - 589K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.167%
of 589K followers
Per impression
4.41%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
3.79%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
982
interactions (median)
Saved
0.484%
108 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 982 interactions against 589K followers, an engagement rate of 0.167%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 4.41% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.2K interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

πšŽπš•πš’πšœπšŽβ™‘'s engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 89% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.167%, πšŽπš•πš’πšœπšŽβ™‘ sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.438%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.438%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,459 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,523 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.438%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-3%100K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-4%101K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-1%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%236K
Monday0%298K
Tuesday-3%295K
Wednesday-1%255K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%257K
Saturday+3%231K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • May 6, 20263.3x their median

    hii c: say it back https://t.co/pS9qtavEOK

    2.9K67237052K viewsView on X
  • Mar 11, 20262.5x their median

    if u see this u have to say hi :> https://t.co/731jj2pTT0

    1.9K2612791133K viewsView on X
  • May 31, 20261.8x their median

    succumb to the feet https://t.co/zV9XfM8gKp

    1.7K4642024K viewsView on X
  • Apr 24, 20261.7x their median

    got dress coded for β€œserious cleavage” at work today https://t.co/DCzpF885rw

    1.6K3442131K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20261.7x their median

    im going to eat you https://t.co/buEmXgOS3y

    1.6K5366027K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20261.7x their median

    what are you looking at? https://t.co/56UD6ReBMa

    1.5K38141022K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20261.6x their median

    caught ya https://t.co/GRqDwaVkTK

    1.5K4491024K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 20261.6x their median

    say hi if you wanna be my good boy https://t.co/AjE80xkkQn

    1.4K42181125K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20261.6x their median

    tummy tuesday gooners >;) https://t.co/JBdPN46I3R

    1.4K48125025K viewsView on X
  • Apr 3, 20261.6x their median

    are your dms open for me? https://t.co/516ZI4TREU

    1.3K36199133K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 982 interactions against 589K followers, an engagement rate of 0.167%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 4.41% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.2K interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post.

What is πšŽπš•πš’πšœπšŽβ™‘'s engagement rate on X?
πšŽπš•πš’πšœπšŽβ™‘ (@eliseowo_) has an engagement rate of 0.167%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 588,536 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.167%, πšŽπš•πš’πšœπšŽβ™‘ sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @eliseowo_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @eliseowo_ post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going