̷E̷̷l̷̷l̷̷e̷̷x̷̷x̷̷a̷̷u̷̷r̷̷u̷̷s̷ engagement report

Compared with accounts its own size

̷E̷̷l̷̷l̷̷e̷̷x̷̷x̷̷a̷̷u̷̷r̷̷u̷̷s̷'s engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.149%, ̷E̷̷l̷̷l̷̷e̷̷x̷̷x̷̷a̷̷u̷̷r̷̷u̷̷s̷ sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.433%.

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 993K followers, an engagement rate of 0.149%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 112K times each, and 1.31% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 16% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 8.6x its own typical post.

What is ̷E̷̷l̷̷l̷̷e̷̷x̷̷x̷̷a̷̷u̷̷r̷̷u̷̷s̷'s engagement rate on X?

̷E̷̷l̷̷l̷̷e̷̷x̷̷x̷̷a̷̷u̷̷r̷̷u̷̷s̷ (@ellexxaurus) has an engagement rate of 0.149%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 993,008 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.

Is that a good engagement rate?

At 0.149%, ̷E̷̷l̷̷l̷̷e̷̷x̷̷x̷̷a̷̷u̷̷r̷̷u̷̷s̷ sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.

Does @ellexxaurus have real engagement?

Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.

When does @ellexxaurus post?

Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.