Back to @ericfisher's profile

Eric Fisher engagement report

@ericfisher - 580K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.013%
of 580K followers
Per impression
0.802%
9.7K views on a typical post
Reach
1.67%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
78
interactions (median)
Saved
0.01%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 78 interactions against 580K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 0.802% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.4K interactions, about 31x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #wbz, #hawt, #seagulls.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #wbz, #hawt, #seagulls.

Compared with accounts its own size

Eric Fisher's engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, Eric Fisher sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.432%
p902.10%
p99161.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,378 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.432%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile161.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 202631x their median

    JARREN DURAN WITH THE GRAND SLAM IN THE 11TH DURING A YEAR OF STRUGGLES! https://t.co/G1DKol1G9k

    2.2K1304533112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202627x their median

    Red Sox: Last 9 games: 9-0 (best in MLB) Last 20 games: 17-3 (best in MLB) Last 30 games: 27-3 (best in MLB) Last 40 games: 33-7 (best in MLB) Last 50 games: 37-13 (best in MLB) Last 60 games: 41-19 (best in MLB) Last 70 games: 45-25 (best in MLB)

    1.8K2662024112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202623x their median

    The last time the Boston Red Sox lost a series… The USMNT was still alive in the World Cup. Let that sink in.

    1.8K404370K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202314x their median

    If you haven't heard yet, our own @sarahwroblewski's little boy is going through the unexpected battle of childhood cancer Please consider lending a helping hand to Sarah and her wonderful family during a tough time ❤️ #wbz https://t.co/STFnCVpspS

    7902914171.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.5x their median

    Well that was a fun morning on Stellwagen 🐋 https://t.co/sFoL7uHBp3

    25787111K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20263.3x their median

    Set it and forget it summer weather ahead. Great for beach vacations and poolside hangs. Within a degree or two of 90F and humid for the next week. A couple PM storms here and there, mainly interior areas. Water temps will reach their peak over the next week or two. #wbz https://t.co/7Qv5B78s3l

    2221615323K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.8x their median

    Pretty wild how established this El Nino is already. Continues to track on pace for a record event Same date in 1997 also shown as a comparison (which was a huge event at the time) https://t.co/GMOWaWE2Wc

    1802313221K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20262.3x their median

    This team is out of control. Unreal! Wearing a Wally Head to the beach this weekend https://t.co/GvQQcWPi0R

    1714309.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.1x their median

    Using the cooler temps today to head out and stock up on blueberries 👍 https://t.co/jq3Ecuq1Vh

    1564429.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.0x their median

    Second time in a week we've had a solid little spinny guy south of Long Island. Impressive looking https://t.co/r99bB8PoNA

    14173215K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#wbz#hawt#seagulls#toasty

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 78 interactions against 580K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 0.802% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.4K interactions, about 31x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #wbz, #hawt, #seagulls.

What is Eric Fisher's engagement rate on X?
Eric Fisher (@ericfisher) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 579,863 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, Eric Fisher sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ericfisher have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ericfisher post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going