Back to @eth_apple's profile

ZAMA_APPLE🇰🇷 engagement report

@eth_apple - 191K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.168%
of 191K followers
Per impression
2.29%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
7.34%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
321
interactions (median)
Saved
0.039%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.57/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 321 interactions against 191K followers, an engagement rate of 0.168%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 2.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026. Recurring tag: #ad.

Compared with accounts its own size

ZAMA_APPLE🇰🇷's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.168%, ZAMA_APPLE🇰🇷 sits above the 50th percentile of the 217,745 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.149% to 0.704%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.704%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 217,745 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,722 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.704%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video71% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link29% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 437 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 14, 202612x their median

    some thoughts on Arc chain: ppl building on Arc or related to Arc have reached out to me several times over the past few weeks apparently, they want to get trenchers onto the chain early because they understand that memecoin activity is one of the fastest ways to bootstrap traction for a new chain i mostly ignored them i've been too busy to even keep track of all the messages i get these days, but more importantly, i've believed that onchain activity this cycle will be concentrated around Robinhood, BNB and Solana that was my bias until i learned that fomo will be integrating Arc shortly after launch Seyong from fomo recently told me that the integration should happen within a few days of launch and honestly, that changed my short-term bias on Arc don't get me wrong i still believe RH/BNB/SOL will be where the majority of the real action happens this cycle but there's something important to consider: fomo hasn't even integrated Hyperliquid, Tron or TON and all three of those chains produced runners that reached $100m+ so if fomo is integrating Arc right out of the gate, i think there's a very real possibility that there will be some serious short-term money-making opportunities for trenchers and that's the key distinction: short term i am NOT saying Arc is going to become the next BNB, Robinhood or Solana i'm saying this is the first time fomo will be integrating a non-mainstream chain essentially from launch that makes Arc a very interesting experiment and i'm positioned accordingly i bought the native token of the main launchpad on Arc, $LONG, along with the top 3 memecoins on the launchpad my thesis is basically this: 1. fomo is integrating Arc fomo is becoming one of the main crypto trading apps for retail this cycle i originally ignored Arc entirely the fomo integration changed that 2. Arc is actively trying to attract trenchers multiple ppl building around Arc have reached out to top trenchers like myself that suggests they understand how important early memecoin activity can be for a new chain 3. they appear to be trying the Robinhood playbook i've also had a source tell me that Arc understands how important it is to have trenchers on the chain early and is actively focused on making that happen essentially, they're borrowing a page from the Robinhood playbook and i want to be super, super clear about this: this is a degen, degen rabbit hole this is a short-term adventure i'm not rotating my core thesis away from RH/BNB/SOL and i genuinely believe that RH/BNB/SOL is where you want to concentrate your energy this cycle... and that most other chains will likely be a waste of time on a long enough timeframe so why am i touching Arc? i'm simply betting that the combination of new chain + launchpad + trenchers + fomo integration could create some very interesting early opportunities if you're interested in exploring it, you can either wait for the fomo integration later this week or bridge over earlier through the main launchpad on Arc, Long for those who want to bridge: 1. buy $CRCL on Robinhood (most tokens on Arc are paired against $CRCL): https://t.co/H4FCjOVDN5 2. bridge your Robinhood Chain $CRCL to Arc using the bridge provided by the main launchpad: https://t.co/De7zYyG3WF 3. buy whatever you want through https://t.co/XPOUSqINma IMPORTANT: don't use trading bots like Basedbot or GMGN right now they're routing through the wrong pools and you could end up losing a significant amount of your money to slippage and if you're not on fomo yet, you really should hurry to get your account set up if this thesis plays out, you don't want to be setting everything up after the opportunities have already appeared join through my ref: https://t.co/J39grZN8rY i'm also doing a $350k giveaway for active fomo refs so you could literally get rewarded for being early again: this is a short-term degen experiment but if you're a trencher, this is exactly the kind of setup i'd want on my radar before the masses arrive

    2.7K3617102502.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20268.0x their median

    Launch Date Update: ⧼ September 7th -> September 15th ⧽ We’re expanding our prelaunch window with multiple major strategic partnerships on the way, alongside a new wave of members joining through the Allowlist Quests as Fortune Foes' hype reaches new heights.

    1.3K4437901531K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20265.2x their median

    Snapshot taken. Whitelist closed. WL: today 4:00 PM ET. Public follows First come, first served. Friends mint on @opensea https://t.co/JzmKZVsb7N

    98013947467162K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20264.9x their median

    I committed to angel investing in Yield Fields today. I have 10 WL spots to give away for Yield Fields. Who should I give them to? Follow @YieldFields_RH and @Skarly. https://t.co/i5shvICjf4

    803228542355K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20264.4x their median

    Woke up to the Singapore government airdropping $500 cash into my bank account Yes, again! I have no idea how many times this has happened already this year Best government benefits ever? https://t.co/d76xAsaL1b

    1.2K281585574K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20262.7x their median

    After the tremendous success of NFTs on Zcash, they are now doing NFTs on Zama

    554172573556K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20262.6x their median

    When did we start calling random shitcoins "gems"

    532102751532K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20262.1x their median

    MILESTONE: The Zama Protocol Shielded TVL just passed $100M. Shield, send, deposit, earn, and swap confidential tokens at: https://t.co/XvCL8kYxA6 https://t.co/Bi5CJV1MBa

    47385782853K viewsView on X
  • Mar 11, 20242.0x their median

    https://t.co/RrREJBs4Zb

    2831252304452K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20261.5x their median

    When you zoom out, bitcoin:native is still looking very good here, I remain bullish for Q4

    31011158817K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ad

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 321 interactions against 191K followers, an engagement rate of 0.168%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 2.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is ZAMA_APPLE🇰🇷's engagement rate on X?
ZAMA_APPLE🇰🇷 (@eth_apple) has an engagement rate of 0.168%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 190,769 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.168%, ZAMA_APPLE🇰🇷 sits above the 50th percentile of the 217,745 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @eth_apple have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @eth_apple post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going