Back to @faisalislam's profile

Faisal Islam engagement report

@faisalislam - 366K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.102%
of 366K followers
Per impression
0.772%
48K views on a typical post
Reach
13.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
372
interactions (median)
Saved
0.035%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.7/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 372 interactions against 366K followers, an engagement rate of 0.102%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 4,346 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 0.772% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video, 40% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 54K interactions, about 144x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026. Recurring tag: #manchesterlalala.

Compared with accounts its own size

Faisal Islam's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,346 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.102%, Faisal Islam sits above the 50th percentile of the 42,087 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.084% to 0.449%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.084%
p750.449%
p902.07%
p99143.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 42,087 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 84,187 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.084%
75th percentile0.449%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile143.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%59K
01:00 UTC-2%60K
02:00 UTC-4%58K
03:00 UTC-4%62K
04:00 UTC-6%50K
05:00 UTC-5%49K
06:00 UTC-5%56K
07:00 UTC-5%61K
08:00 UTC-4%71K
09:00 UTC-4%82K
10:00 UTC-3%84K
11:00 UTC-3%91K
12:00 UTC-2%100K
13:00 UTC-2%110K
14:00 UTC-3%113K
15:00 UTC-2%117K
16:00 UTC-3%114K
17:00 UTC-3%106K
18:00 UTC-2%99K
19:00 UTC-2%93K
20:00 UTC-1%87K
21:00 UTC-1%77K
22:00 UTC-2%67K
23:00 UTC-1%60K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%257K
Monday+1%329K
Tuesday-2%355K
Wednesday-4%323K
Thursday-3%273K
Friday-3%277K
Saturday+3%250K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 30, 2026144x their median

    We stand shoulder to shoulder with our European colleagues and fully support the collective view. We oppose FIFA’s plans. The FIFA World Cup belongs to football and always will. https://t.co/BuF7srQ8cJ

    47K5.7K4962801.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026115x their median

    DE NO CREER Anunciamos una cadena nacional para el jueves a las 21:00 hs. sobre un tema SAGRADO para los argentinos como es la causa de Malvinas, un reclamo histórico del pueblo argentino que al día de hoy sigue viendo violentada su soberanía nacional, y las MIERDAS HUMANAS (95%) de siempre salen a llorar por el uso de la cadena nacional. ¿Qué causa más importante y estratégica para los intereses vitales de la Nación puede haber más importante que la causa Malvinas? ¿Si este tema, que desconocen absolutamente, no amerita una cadena nacional, que tema lo ameritaría? O será que simplemente hay un conjunto de MIERDAS HUMANAS (95%) que van a atacar al gobierno incluso si implica defender intereses extranjeros? Vergüenza les debería dar. Nosotros seguiremos defendiendo los intereses de la Nación Argentina con uñas y dientes pese a quien le pese. VIVA LA LIBERTAD CARAJO...!!!

    36K4.4K2.5K4821.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 201912x their median

    Hello all - I’m back on here, back in economics and after a few weeks wilfully getting lost in transit, am newly on here👇🏾, and shortly on air in a new role as Economics Editor of the BBC.. first take on data, trade wars, Brexit, fiscal gymnastics...👋 https://t.co/3ZFevXzDG8

    3.1K48065592View on X
  • Jul 31, 202611x their median

    BREAKING: Infantino's senior advisor Carlos Cordeiro QUITS over World Cup plan https://t.co/OTbA8vFXRw https://t.co/XYezrr1muA

    3.3K5758388283K viewsView on X
  • Apr 24, 20269.2x their median

    Today we announce Thrive Eternal, a permanent capital holding company that will be concentrated in a small number of assets that we can own and steward over many decades. Across Thrive Capital and Thrive Holdings, we are building and investing through a moment of exponential change; backing emerging technologies, the infrastructure that powers them, and the businesses they can transform. Increasingly, we see a fourth category. These are assets with qualities that cannot be replicated by technology. Iconic franchises and cultural institutions rooted in tradition, identity, and shared experience. In a world shaped by abundant intelligence where creation scales and distribution fragments, we believe they will matter even more. Thrive Eternal is built on the belief that the most enduring of these assets share common characteristics: they benefit from long-term stewardship, they compound through cultural resonance, and they are enhanced by technology rather than displaced by it. Our work at Thrive has always been informed and inspired by a deep appreciation for product, brand, and the ways in which consumers form lasting relationships with the things they love. We have been building towards this for a long time. Our first partnership is expected to be with the San Francisco Giants - an institution built on more than a century of shared identity and community, and among the most iconic sports franchises in America. We have reached an agreement, subject to league approval, to acquire an ownership stake. We feel privileged by the opportunity to be long-term partners to the Giants.

    3.1K95157114619K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20263.1x their median

    Incredible! https://t.co/zwOq056xRm

    1.1K7718641K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.7x their median

    Totally unforgettable… Moment of totality. Eclipse twilight, solar flares, corona, stars appearing above in the Ebro Delta. Stunning. https://t.co/r0k3qy2XQi

    91960226110K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20262.6x their median

    The 4 most well informed souls in politics https://t.co/EJ6h2E8TlO

    872698690K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20262.4x their median

    PM on social care …pretty clear in conclusion “I’m not going to be deflected by point scoring or the screaming headlines, that is what has set back social care… come back to the point about the political and media culture of this country ..if we try to shut down a serious debate about an issue like this then shame on all of us… I would never forgive myself if I left without having tried because of the inevitable headlines and scare stories… people are already scared by what they are seeing through their own eyes in their own homes or in care homes”… Burnham says that he will back Louise Casey 100% whose report is now brought forward a year… says he’ll do it for his Dad and millions up and down the country, with a bit of a crack in his voice. He also stressed the need to have cross party consultations as far away from an election as possible. Appears clear that PM is focussing on the suggestions or depiction of social care options as being “death taxes”, especially in the wider media, and he feels he can win that argument, which in turn rather suggests that estate taxes are a clear direction of travel here…

    6511189926138K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20261.8x their median

    7 years as BBC economics editor, and this afternoon will see my 8th Chancellor of the Exchequer…

    57342381040K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#manchesterlalala

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 372 interactions against 366K followers, an engagement rate of 0.102%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 4,346 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 0.772% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video, 40% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 54K interactions, about 144x its own typical post.

What is Faisal Islam's engagement rate on X?
Faisal Islam (@faisalislam) has an engagement rate of 0.102%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 366,238 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.102%, Faisal Islam sits above the 50th percentile of the 42,087 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @faisalislam have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,346 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @faisalislam post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going