Back to @fasc1nate's profile

Fascinating engagement report

@fasc1nate - 3.4M followers on X

Measured over 356 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.007%
of 3.4M followers
Per impression
0.387%
66K views on a typical post
Reach
1.95%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
254
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
21 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
11.9/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 254 interactions against 3.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 356 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 66K times each, and 0.387% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 11.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 356 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.7K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 356 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fascinating's engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, Fascinating sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 17, 202611x their median

    Photo taken by a 16-year-old girl who snuck a camera into a Queen concert in 1978. The coolest photos ever taken: https://t.co/vKQ8CmLZ3V https://t.co/YhWkuhfxd9

    2.6K9563103K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20269.9x their median

    A McDonald's employee with Down syndrome retires after 32 years of serving smiles. More rare historical photos: https://t.co/W7jIvOHun5 https://t.co/umZTXFRmSd

    2.4K8784105K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20267.8x their median

    Vincent D'Onofrio The coolest old school photos: https://t.co/vKQ8CmLZ3V https://t.co/LAsGIXxHQL

    1.9K7420299K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20267.7x their median

    Marisa Tomei’s yearbook from 1982. See more photos: https://t.co/5RsDzHqM2J https://t.co/aJhQHoOmLc

    1.8K82372110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20267.4x their median

    (1993) The Jews saved by Oskar Schindler during WWII at his grave in Jerusalem, with Liam Neeson in front next to Oskar Schindler's wife. The most haunting photos ever taken: https://t.co/MAmJ19KdIC https://t.co/6GMzBYW8yf

    1.7K11418389K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20267.3x their median

    Uma Thurman’s mother, Nena von Schleebrügge, poses for Vogue magazine, 1958. Effortlessly cool photos: https://t.co/Pgcn2bknZu https://t.co/Lf6RCFcnB6

    1.7K10110479K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20266.8x their median

    Pierce Brosnan married Keely Shaye Brosnan in 2001 after first meeting in 1994. Effortlessly cool photos: https://t.co/vKQ8CmLZ3V https://t.co/gteDHsLlXD

    1.7K34131106K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20266.5x their median

    Cybil Shepherd, 1970s See more photos: https://t.co/5ZkkfecE4B https://t.co/Cp2mbS3rz8

    1.6K367377K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20265.7x their median

    Sean Flynn, the son of Hollywood star Errol Flynn, began his career as an actor in the early 1960s but later walked away from films in search of something more meaningful. By 1966, he had reinvented himself as a photojournalist, covering some of the world’s most dangerous conflicts, including the Vietnam War. Known for his fearlessness, Flynn often worked on the front lines and gained international recognition for his combat photographs. In early 1970, Flynn traveled to Cambodia after reports that North Vietnamese forces had expanded operations there. On April 6, 1970, he left Phnom Penh with a group of journalists heading to a government-sponsored press conference in Saigon. While most of the group traveled by limousine, Flynn and fellow journalist Dana Stone chose to ride motorcycles. Along the route, they learned that several journalists had recently been captured at a nearby checkpoint. Flynn and Stone decided to investigate. They never returned and were never seen again. Despite years of rumors and unconfirmed reports about their fate, no definitive evidence ever surfaced. In 1984, fourteen years after his disappearance, Sean Flynn was officially declared dead. More chilling historical photos: https://t.co/POrqRRccxc

    1.3K89286117K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20265.4x their median

    Feb 2, 1959, Buddy Holly performed his last ever concert, at the Surf Ballroom in Clear Lake, Iowa. The 11th of 24 shows on the Winter Dance party tour. This is said to be the last photo of him taken. It also shows Waylon Jennings on bass. More chilling historical photos: https://t.co/POrqRRccxc

    1.3K10219298K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 254 interactions against 3.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 356 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 66K times each, and 0.387% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 11.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 356 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.7K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is Fascinating's engagement rate on X?
Fascinating (@fasc1nate) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 356 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,364,328 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, Fascinating sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @fasc1nate have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @fasc1nate post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 11.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going