Back to @femalelongevity's profile

Kayla Barnes-Lentz engagement report

@femalelongevity - 457K followers on X

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.006%
of 457K followers
Per impression
0.185%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
3.48%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
28
interactions (median)
Saved
0.074%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 457K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 4,310 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.185% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 294 interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kayla Barnes-Lentz's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,310 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, Kayla Barnes-Lentz sits above the 10th percentile of the 41,569 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.013%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.083%
p750.447%
p902.07%
p99143.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 41,569 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 89,905 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.083%
75th percentile0.447%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile143.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%58K
01:00 UTC-2%59K
02:00 UTC-3%58K
03:00 UTC-4%62K
04:00 UTC-6%50K
05:00 UTC-5%48K
06:00 UTC-5%56K
07:00 UTC-4%60K
08:00 UTC-4%70K
09:00 UTC-4%81K
10:00 UTC-3%83K
11:00 UTC-3%91K
12:00 UTC-2%100K
13:00 UTC-2%109K
14:00 UTC-3%112K
15:00 UTC-2%116K
16:00 UTC-4%113K
17:00 UTC-3%105K
18:00 UTC-2%98K
19:00 UTC-2%92K
20:00 UTC-1%86K
21:00 UTC-1%76K
22:00 UTC-2%66K
23:00 UTC-1%59K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%255K
Monday+1%328K
Tuesday-2%353K
Wednesday-4%317K
Thursday-2%269K
Friday-3%276K
Saturday+3%249K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • May 20, 202611x their median

    Lots of new followers here, so I thought I would share what I have been working on for a decade+ and what I have learned about female health and longevity from publicly sharing the most data as a woman in the world.. (a Thread) https://t.co/KIMmxVKwVx

    25810251423K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20266.0x their median

    Post podcast, early dinner, bioregulator and lab hangs with @AbudBakri. On the pod we discussed: - Sun / circadian rhythm - Metabolic health - EMFs / environmental toxins - Thymus and Thymus protocols - Thyroid health - Immune health - Red Light - Mitochondria - Peptides - New Endo peptide & more! Podcast coming soon!

    148910017K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.5x their median

    Gave a talk earlier on women’s health: We covered: HRT, female longevity risks and how to build a female longevity protocol, changes women experience in the perimenopause / menopause, bone density & muscle mass and so much more. 😘 Women’s longevity protocols should be quite different than men’s.

    6036116K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.4x their median

    25 microhabits that support my hormones. (None of them take more than 10 minutes.) Light and circadian - 10 min outdoor light within 30 min of waking - Same wake time daily, weekends included - Dim overheads after sunset, warm lamps only - Cool, fully blacked out bedroom Blood sugar - Protein before my first coffee - Savory breakfast instead of sweet - 10 min walk after my largest meal - Fiber and protein before the starch - Last bite about 3 hours before bed Fuel - 30g+ protein at breakfast - 30 different plants a week - Cruciferous vegetables most days - Eating enough, especially on training days - Omega-3 rich food several times a week Muscle and movement - Strength train 3x a week - 2 minutes of movement every hour I sit - Loaded carries once a week - Easy zone 2 walk most days Stress and nervous system - 5 slow breaths, long exhales, before food - Caffeine with food, none within 10 hours of bed - Skipping alcohol - 10 quiet minutes a day with no input Exposures - Fragrance free personal care and laundry - Glass or stainless for anything hot - Tracking my cycle as a vital sign If you only pick three: morning light, 30g protein at breakfast, a 10 minute walk after dinner. Consistency beats intensity here. Bio-individual, work with your doctor.

    5366113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.0x their median

    If you’re not musclemaxxing, now is the time to start. Sarcopenia starts around 40. You lose roughly 8% of your muscle per decade until about 70, and around 15% per decade after that. (In the video I’m doing a pull down with my actual body weight) Before perimenopause, muscle holds steady in most cases. Through the transition it flips, and after menopause it falls about 0.6% a year while fat gain nearly doubles. We also start 30 to 35% behind men in absolute muscle mass. The transition widens a gap that was already there. So the stake is whether you can get off the floor unaided at eighty, whether your blood sugar stays in range, and whether your bones become brittle.

    4834117K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20261.9x their median

    I have the "best oral microbiome result" that my dentist has ever seen! @DrSanda is my LA biological dentist. Here's my recent result, but more importantly, let's talk about how the oral microbiome impacts our health and longevity and what I do to keep mine optimized. Your mouth is the gateway to whole-body health. Why the oral microbiome matters for longevity: → Heart health: Harmful oral bacteria can enter the bloodstream and drive arterial inflammation. Poor oral health is linked to higher cardiovascular disease risk. → Brain health: Certain gum-disease bacteria (like P. gingivalis) have been found in the brains of Alzheimer's patients, oral care may be neuroprotective. → Inflammation: Gum disease keeps your body in a chronic low-grade inflammatory state, one of the core drivers of aging. → Blood sugar: Oral and metabolic health are a two-way street, inflammation here worsens insulin resistance. → Nitric oxide: The right oral bacteria convert nitrates into nitric oxide, supporting healthy blood pressure and circulation. Your mouth isn't separate from your body. Optimize it. Here's exactly what I do: - Daily flossing 1x per day - Water pik flossing 2x per day - No mouth washes - Prebiotic toothpaste - Oral red/blue light once a week (red for inflammation/blue for whitening) - I brush 5x per day personally, not sure if that's needed but I do it (once upon waking, after coffee, after breakfast, after dinner, before bed) - Don't drink alcohol which can disrupt microbiomes - Limit sugar and eat non processed foods. - Ozone pulling once a month or so By the way, I think it's pretty rare that I tag the docs that make these claims like best microbiome ever, I think it provides transparency. Lots of people just have their team behind the scenes, I love celebrating the amazing women that work with me, advise me, and share valuable insights on my podcast.

    4535016K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.8x their median

    Why everyone feels like crap: - Addicted to your phone - Eats processed foods often - Goes to bed late to stay up watching TV - Rarely moves and going from the couch to the refrigerator doesn’t count - Is disconnected from nature and the sun - Can’t sit alone with their thoughts for 10 minutes - Can’t “find the time” to exercise - Orders takeout packaged in microplastics (eats microplastics all day) - Drinks microplastics all day (bottled water, tap water, soda) - Spends more time on social media than with people - Indulges in substances often (vape, weed, alcohol etc) And we really wonder why everyone feels awful? Start small, but just start doing something. Go on a walk right now, watch the sunset, go to bed early.

    441519.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20261.8x their median

    My exact protocol for optimal bone health. (A woman's lifetime risk of breaking a hip is greater than her combined risk of breast, uterine & ovarian cancer) Bone (and muscle) are what keep you physically independent as you age. ~80% of osteoporosis is women - 1 in 2 women over 50 will break a bone ~1 in 4 women dies within a year of a hip fracture Our bone peaks in your late teens and 20s. Most women aren't scanned until 65, when insurance finally covers it. Decades too late. The good news: you can build bone at ANY age. Proof: the LIFTMOR trial. - 30 min of heavy lifting, 2x/week, for 8 months. - Spine bone density: → Trained: +2.9% → Didn't: −1.2% - Two opposite directions, in under a year.

    4344016K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20261.5x their median

    I'm the first woman to publicly measure her ovarian age, and now I'm running the experiments to find out what actually slows it down. Most people accept ovarian aging as fixed, I don't. So I'm testing interventions on myself, one at a time, and publishing the results. Intervention #1: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). 40 sessions. One hour a day, five days a week. Before HBOT, my ovarian age was 4.0 years younger than my chronological age. After: 4.2 years younger. This could be a meaningful ovarian longevity intervention. More to come on it. Next up: red light laser therapy. This is the first data from an n-of-1 experiment no woman has run in public before. Follow along, I will continue to share my results, good and bad.

    4012015K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20261.5x their median

    Things woman should know about their health, PT one. Most of this never comes up at a standard annual visit. It should. https://t.co/n3HsaXOi7Y

    3912015K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 457K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 4,310 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.185% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 294 interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is Kayla Barnes-Lentz's engagement rate on X?
Kayla Barnes-Lentz (@femalelongevity) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 48 original posts from the last 30 days against 456,814 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, Kayla Barnes-Lentz sits above the 10th percentile of the 41,569 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @femalelongevity have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,310 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @femalelongevity post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going