Back to @figma's profile

Figma engagement report

@figma - 573K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.087%
of 573K followers
Per impression
1.05%
47K views on a typical post
Reach
8.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
497
interactions (median)
Saved
0.162%
77 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 497 interactions against 573K followers, an engagement rate of 0.087%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video, 41% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.0K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Figma's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 53% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.087%, Figma sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 8, 202616x their median

    It’s over. I’m quitting design. A client of mine just created a logo with Fable 5, and the result left me speechless. It understood the brand story, values, audience, strategy, and turned all of it into a smart, minimal symbol. A genuinely brilliant concept. The kind of idea that captures everything at once. Something I honestly don’t think I would have come up with myself. And it didn’t just nail the idea. It executed the design pixel-perfectly. So I raise the white flag. My skepticism about AI’s ability to do great design is officially gone. There, I said it: AI beat me at design. Now that AI finally took my job, I can peacefully quit and dedicate my life to studying the only thing it may never achieve: human consciousness and the pathways to God. Good luck everyone.

    6.2K2989555307.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20268.9x their median

    🗂️ Projects └🗂️ Are now 
 └🗂️ Folders
 └🗂️ (We won)
 └🗂️ Rolling out over the next few weeks https://t.co/Pls77ivb6m

    3.9K243149151752K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20265.6x their median

    Introducing Source Material — the weekly series where the designers & creatives shaping culture share the references that shaped them. Our first guest is Thom Bettridge: Editor-in-Chief of @i_D and founder of Content World. 00:00 - Introducing Source Material 00:08 Joe's Magazine (First Issue) 00:49 Colors: A Book about a Magazine About the Rest of the World 01:27 Balenciaga Archetype magazine 02:00 032c 33 (Frank Ocean Cover) 02:28 All-In Nº9 03:32 Highstyle (Migos Cover) 04:23 i-D 374 (“The Unknown Issue” Enza Khoury Cover) 05:42 i-D 375 (“The Beta Issue” Born In 2025 Cover) 06:50 Outro

    2.5K16874864.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20265.1x their median

    Turned 14 years old today https://t.co/jVgbrfP2Mk

    2.1K165146102154K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.5x their median

    When we say wrap it up, we mean Pretty and Balance (available now) https://t.co/PS3UvLCDxA

    1.5K816067168K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.1x their median

    Class is in session with Laurie Pressman, VP of the @Pantone Color Institute https://t.co/IjI0IMfLxN

    1.4K883756.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20263.0x their median

    If you use a trackpad who hurt you

    99685236152312K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.6x their median

    Erase your heart out, then fill it back up New vector tools to play with https://t.co/1ZSEwZJg5T

    1.1K654755112K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20262.1x their median

    Figma Motion in Figma Motion https://t.co/J2DszhSMDL

    90368361477K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20261.8x their median

    Jimothy on the move https://t.co/Wf1tdEMxsz

    75873391251K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 497 interactions against 573K followers, an engagement rate of 0.087%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video, 41% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.0K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

What is Figma's engagement rate on X?
Figma (@figma) has an engagement rate of 0.087%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 573,482 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.087%, Figma sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @figma have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @figma post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going