Back to @g1's profile

g1 engagement report

@g1 - 14M followers on X

Measured over 539 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0%
of 14M followers
Per impression
0.35%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
0.12%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
57
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
17.97/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 57 interactions against 14M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 539 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.116% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 18 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 539 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video and 66% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 455x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #g1, #eleição2026, #notícias.

Measured over 539 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #g1, #eleição2026, #notícias.

Compared with accounts its own size

g1's engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, g1 sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 2026455x their median

    Lula decreto luto oficial de três dias pelas mortes de Glória Menezes e Laura Cardoso https://t.co/xOUA586xf0 https://t.co/St9LRe1QCK

    24K1.2K104142468K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026167x their median

    'Nossa amizade é tão forte que decidimos casar': as amigas que optaram por união platônica https://t.co/ParwDPoA4R https://t.co/qFxfD4KWud

    7.5K1554551.4K1.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026132x their median

    Justiça de SP condena Danilo Gentili por calúnia e difamação contra Padre Júlio Lancelloti | G1 https://t.co/C8E8LKrcwJ https://t.co/WaYfxNWXex

    7.1K3188450112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026125x their median

    Santos tem 100% das praias impróprias para banho; veja situação na Baixada Santista https://t.co/aAf1vrRGvg

    6.4K256165288321K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202672x their median

    PL tenta barrar votação, mas admite derrota se PEC do fim da escala 6x1 chegar ao plenário https://t.co/MIzOQITvTt https://t.co/5d2GFgUyNW

    3.6K3381114195K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202665x their median

    Sem tratamento - A esposa do influenciador Lito Sousa, do canal Aviões e Música, contou em um vídeo que ele teve o diagnóstico da doença Creutzfeld-Jacob. No vídeo, publicado nesta sexta-feira (21) a esposa de Lito, Mila, comentou que o diagnóstico demorou a ser fechado, mas que nas últimas semanas o influenciador perdeu parte da capacidade motora e recebeu a notícia da doença. 🔎A Doença de Creutzfeldt-Jakob (DCJ) é uma doença priônica humana — rara, neurodegenerativa, progressiva e sem cura. O quadro costuma começar com demência, perda de memória e tremores, e evolui com outros sinais neurológicos que afetam diferentes regiões do cérebro simultaneamente. Existem quatro formas conhecidas de DCJ: esporádica, hereditária, iatrogênica e a nova variante (vDCJ). ⚠️Segundo levantamento do Ministério da Saúde, o Brasil registrou 547 casos confirmados da enfermidade entre 2005 e 2021 — período que corresponde aos primeiros 17 anos desde que a DCJ passou a integrar a lista de notificações compulsórias. Veja mais detalhes no #g1. #lito #Creutzfeldtjakob #doençarara #doençadegenerativa #g1saúde

    3.5K1356126354K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202662x their median

    Tarcísio Meira e Glória Menezes se conheceram no teatro e foram casados por 59 anos https://t.co/3Ud3o9KVl8 https://t.co/UY5dq1QZhl

    3.4K8471156K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202651x their median

    Lula diz que petróleo do Amapá é 'soberania nacional' e que Brasil não aceitará interferências https://t.co/TEEXwOxrDY https://t.co/g5APpoVTHC

    2.6K1571012546K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202646x their median

    Escada submersa em Lagoa misteriosa cria cena surreal e caminhada debaixo d'água em MS https://t.co/AUJYt6e7g7 #g1 https://t.co/R1QGM1YFeb

    2.5K90168138K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202645x their median

    ENTREVISTA COM O CANDIDATO - Renan Santos (Missão) participa nesta quarta-feira (26) da série de entrevistas da TV Globo com os candidatos à Presidência da República nas eleições de 2026. A entrevista é conduzida pelos jornalistas Renata Vasconcellos e César Tralli. A Globo convidou os seis candidatos mais bem colocados na pesquisa de intenção de voto divulgada pela Quaest em 14 de agosto. A ordem das entrevistas foi definida por sorteio, com a presença de representantes dos partidos. A programação é a seguinte: 24 de agosto (segunda-feira): Romeu Zema (Novo) 25 de agosto (terça-feira): Ronaldo Caiado (PSD) 26 de agosto (quarta-feira): Renan Santos (Missão) 27 de agosto (quinta-feira): Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) 28 de agosto (sexta-feira): Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) 29 de agosto (sábado): Augusto Cury (Avante) Para assistir à íntegra das entrevistas, você pode acessar o Globoplay, o g1 e o YouTube do g1. #renansantos #globo #entrevista #eleição2026 #g1

    2.2K11317926118K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#g1#eleição2026#notícias#jn#renansantos

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 57 interactions against 14M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 539 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.116% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 18 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 539 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video and 66% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 455x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #g1, #eleição2026, #notícias.

What is g1's engagement rate on X?
g1 (@g1) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 539 original posts from the last 30 days against 14,040,874 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, g1 sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @g1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @g1 post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 17.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going