Crypto攻城狮 engagement report
@gcsbtc - 142K followers on X
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 76 interactions against 142K followers, an engagement rate of 0.053%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.526% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.6K interactions, about 100x its own typical post.
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Crypto攻城狮's engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.053%, Crypto攻城狮 sits above the 25th percentile of the 217,745 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.149% |
| 75th percentile | 0.704% |
| 90th percentile | 2.63% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 97% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 36% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 36% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 469 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 27, 2026100x their median
250 万美元，在直播画面里露了几秒，就没了。 今天凌晨五点多我刷到 @voltixsol 发的那段录屏，一个自称加密百万富翁的老哥正在开直播，中途切窗口，把钱包助记词晃进了画面里。 几秒钟。观众里有人手快，250 万美元当场搬空。 这老哥该做对的都做对了，早期进场、拿住了、熊市没割，攒到几百万美元。最后死在一次切屏上。 我自己也干过类似的蠢事。前年录教程，剪完才发现有两帧把地址和余额拍进去了，那钱包里就八百刀，我照样折腾到凌晨三点，把所有资产全搬了家。 盯着那段录屏的人，五秒钟赚走了别人五年。链上转账记录明明白白挂在那儿，收款地址就在眼前，这老哥一分钱也要不回来。 一次切窗口，250 万美元，现在在别人钱包里。
- Sep 15, 20265.1x their median
刷Alpha一年撸400万的，是个卖零食的22岁大学生。 我在抖音刷到他的视频，愣了半天。 他一开始在宿舍楼道里卖辣条泡面，碰上币圈以后零食直接不卖了，开始拉同学刷币安Alpha。 一栋宿舍不够，他就跑去别的学校发展代理。 代理再往下拉人，每个号刷交易量攒积分，积分换空投，他坐在最上面一层一层抽。 去年币安要打下沉市场，这孩子比币安的地推还狠，直接把人头做进了大学宿舍楼。 我盯合约盯了七年，爆过三次仓，K线看到半夜两点，到底赚了个啥？？？ 人家连K线长啥样都不用知道。 22岁，一年400万，别的学校的学生到现在还在排队找他拿代理。
- Oct 29, 20264.6x their median
币圈又出了个欧皇！ 一台 300 美元的小矿机，居然挖出了价值 25 万美元的比特币，回报相当于机器价格的 800 多倍。 10 月 27 日，一位独立矿工成功挖出 BTC 第 973,413 号区块，独吞 3.14 枚 $BTC。 据推测，他用的可能是嘉楠的 Avalon Nano 3S，大小跟路由器差不多，平时甚至能当取暖器用。 这玩意儿算力只有 6.5 TH/s，连专业矿机的四十分之一都不到。 按全网算力估算，理论上平均要挖几千年才能中一次。 别人花几百万建矿场，他花 300 美元买了个小盒子，结果真中了大奖。 这运气，估计把这辈子的欧气都用光了。😂
- Oct 23, 20262.8x their median
https://t.co/pt1HYNFsCT
- Sep 11, 20262.7x their median
脸皮是真厚。SBF 找上最高法院，说客户最后没亏钱。 据《纽约时报》报道，FTX 创始人 SBF 9 月 10 日向美国最高法院递了申请，想把 2023 年的欺诈、共谋和洗钱定罪整个推翻。人还在牢里，判的 25 年。 律师说，当年一审法官不让他们拿“客户最终没受损失”的证据出来。顺手还要把约 110 亿美元的没收令撤了，说罚太狠，违反宪法第八修正案。 第二巡回上诉法院今年 6 月已经维持过原判，这份申请就是在碰运气。 他敢说客户没亏，靠的是 FTX 按 2022 年 11 月破产那天的币价赔钱，那会 1 枚比特币大约 1.7 万刀。相当于你当年在 FTX 放了 1 枚比特币，拿回来的钱按今天 7.7 万刀算，连三分之一枚都买不回来。 当年把币放在 FTX 的人，现在成了他翻案的证据。
- Sep 10, 20262.7x their median
3154亿到33亿，30分钟。这个速度我服。 昨晚拜登的儿子亨特亲自发了个币，叫 $LAPTOP ，就是那台笔记本电脑的梗，他自己拿出来当币名。上线十分钟市值冲破2000亿美金，最高摸到3154亿，然后不到半小时，33亿。评论区全是骂的，一堆等了好几天、开盘第一秒就冲进去的人，现在集体喊骗局。 先说钱去哪了。 链上有人扒出来，做市商 Wintermute 从项目方手里收到250万枚 $LAPTOP ，收到之后就一直在盘口卖。项目方把货交给做市商，做市商把货交给你，全程公开，谁都能查。想不明白的自己去链上看一眼。 同一个盘里的两拨人，长这样。 有个狙击手花了900 USDC，按0.4的价买了2268枚，几分钟全清了。另一个地址扔进去100个 ETH，24.98万刀，几分钟赚了一百多万。Safe 那位架构师，两个钱包领了8553枚，套现64.7万。 另一边。有人专门从币安提了25万刀出来冲，现在账户剩3千。还有个地址拿20万 USDC 按217.5买了919.4枚，50分钟后 LAPTOP 报价4.4，98%没了。 0.4 和 217.5，差500多倍。同一个币，同一个晚上，中间隔不了几分钟。 我之所以对这套东西这么熟，是因为我五年前干过一模一样的蠢事。2021年，某个名人站台的盘，我凌晨三点守着，gas 提前充好，滑点拉到15%，就怕抢不到。成交那一秒我瞄了眼价格，已经是开盘价的六倍，我还挺得意，觉得自己手快。8Wu 进去。两天后清出来，一万一。 我不是在抢筹码，我是早我三十秒那批人的接盘侠。 名人发币这生意，靠的就是他的名字能在半小时里把全球的流动性抽进一个池子，这半小时就是发币方和抢跑的人唯一需要的时间窗口。名气越响，池子越深，砸得越干净。3154亿那个数字，从头到尾就是拿来兑现的，不是给你看的。 到今天早上，CoinGecko 和 CMC 热搜第一还挂着 $LAPTOP 。骂声、截图、爆亏晒单，全是免费流量，全是下一波的预热。
- Sep 6, 20262.6x their median
一堆人赚了1M，为什么你身边一个都没有？ 因为亏掉的那批人不发推。截图这东西天然是单向的，赚了的截图能换来关注和转发，亏了的截图只能换来嘲笑，于是时间线上永远只剩赢家。你看到的不是市场的真实分布，是一层被筛过的糖衣。 Meme 这个游戏的结构从来没变过：极少数人拿走绝大部分筹码，剩下的人负责提供流动性。前面那波涨得越猛，后面接盘的人就越确信"这次我也能"。狂热本身就是燃料，晒单就是点火的那根柴。 真要玩，先把两件事想清楚。第一，这笔钱亏光会不会影响你的生活，答案是会，那就别碰。第二，你的卖点在哪儿，是 3 倍走一半，还是十倍清仓，写下来再进场，别到时候临场靠感觉——涨的时候人是没有理智的。 我不劝人不参与，这轮情绪确实在，链上确实有钱赚。但你得清楚自己坐在牌桌的哪一边，是在赚市场的钱，还是在给别人的截图当素材。 赚 1M 的故事会一直有，问题是它凭什么轮到你。
- Aug 17, 20262.6x their median
两亿笔交易，五百亿美元流水。这组数字不是哪家交易所的月报，而是 x402 这个支付协议已经跑出来的量，掏钱的那一方，很多时候压根不是人。 AI Agent 这两年的变化其实很清楚。以前它只是个会聊天的工具，现在开始真的动手干活了，帮你查资料、写代码、订机票、调 API，甚至跟另一个 Agent 买数据。干活就会花钱，而机器之间那种一次几分钱、一天几十万次的高频结算，传统支付体系根本吃不下，光开户和风控这两关就把路堵死了。所以稳定币加 x402 这条路才被推起来。今年 7 月，Linux 基金会正式把 x402 接过去做成中立标准，Ripple、Stellar、Solana、Circle 都在首批核心成员里，说明这已经不是某一家公司的自选动作。 $AEON 的位置恰好卡在这个交叉点上。它做的是 AI Agent 的加密结算层，本身也是 x402 的 Facilitator。在 BNB Chain 上线的 AEON AI Gateway，让 Agent 用 USDT 按次付费直接调用 200 多种工具，Cursor、Claude Code 这些环境一行命令就能接进去。更关键的是另一头连着现实世界，阿根廷、玻利维亚的国家级支付网络已经打通，全球五千多万家线下商户可以扫码收单。这个赛道画饼的太多，能同时把链上清算和链下商户网络摆出来的，真没几家。 再看盘面。8 月 12 日在 0.051 附近磨了个底，三天最高摸到 0.094，涨幅超过八成，现在回到 0.077 一线震荡，4 小时级别稳稳站在 MA25 上方，RSI 也远没到超买。真正让人在意的是市值，现在只有一千四百多万美元，完全稀释估值七千七百多万。TGE 才过去半个多月，币安 Alpha、OKX、Gate、Bitget、KuCoin 加上 Bithumb 韩元市场全部到手，融资是 YZi Labs 领投的 800 万美元，团队有币安背景。这样的资源配置对上这个体量的市值，怎么看都属于故事刚开讲的阶段。 叙事在升温，业务在跑，价格刚从底部抬头。这三件事凑到一起的时候，通常值得多花点时间盯着。关注 @AEON_Community ，后面的动作应该不会少。
- Aug 12, 20262.5x their median
✅bStocks 新标的上线，现已支持：GMEB/USDT ⏰ 7×24 小时交易，与对应真实股票 1:1 免费即时兑换，尽在币安 🌍 全球市场，一站触达 了解更多 👉 https://t.co/PUw6IranO0 https://t.co/w5JWdqqvbs
- Jul 31, 20262.4x their median
昨晚美股那一波，估计不少人是睁着眼睛看完的。 微软财报一出直接干涨 15.5%，创下 2008 年 10 月以来最大单日涨幅，一晚上市值多出来约 4500 亿美元，刷新美股单日市值增长纪录。存储和半导体更疯，闪迪涨 26%，美光涨超 18%，费城半导体指数一天涨了 8%。三大指数集体收红，纳指涨 2.78%。结果凌晨苹果财报出来，业绩全线超预期，但下季度指引不及预期，盘后一度跌超 8%，市值一夜蒸发三千多亿美元。 一涨一跌都在一晚上。这种行情最难受的不是判断错方向，而是——账户在哪儿？手里没有一个能随时上车、费率还不高的美股账户，看得再准也只能干着急。 所以想聊聊最近一直在用的这个平台，BIT（原 Matrixport）@BITstocks_CN 很多人还以为它是家纯 Crypto 平台，其实方向早就调整了，目标是做一家真正的全球券商，不是加密交易所顺带卖股票。 几个我自己比较看重的点： ✅ 真实美股。底层接的是美国持牌券商，买到的是真股票，不是 CFD，也不是合成资产。用户的资金和证券由多家美国持牌机构托管，跟平台自有资金严格隔离。 ✅ 大陆用户开户门槛低，基本身份证就能申请。目前不在 CRS 自动信息交换安排内，对有跨境资产配置需求的人比较友好。 ✅ 入金方式是真的方便。支持 USDT / USDC 按 1:1 兑换美元，也支持银行电汇和 Wise，还能从老虎、富途、长桥直接转仓过来。手里有 U 的人几分钟就能开始买股票，这一点在昨晚那种行情里价值很直接。 ✅ 美股永久 0 佣金，融资融券也上了，日内融资全额免息，隔夜 $20,000 额度内免息。 ✅ 期权刚上线，首批支持 2000 多只热门股票和 ETF。正股 + 融资融券 + 期权在一个账户里搞定，不用来回切平台。 费率这块单独说一下，因为差距挺明显：期权佣金 $0，平台使用费只要 $0.30 一张，单笔最低 $0.99。买 10 张单，平台端成本大概 3 美元；同样的单子，IBKR 是 1.5 到 6.5 美元，Bitget 6 美元，富途香港 6.5 起，老虎和 moomoo 都是 9.5。像苹果这种财报后波动巨大的票，做期权的人一个月下来能省出不少。 🎁 8 月新人礼，这次力度是 BIT 第一次给到这么大： 活动时间：2026 年 8 月 1 日 00:00 — 8 月 31 日 23:59（UTC+8），新人最高可拿 $310。 · 开户就送 $100 平台费抵扣卡 · 美股 & OPRA 实时行情免费 30 天 · 入金最高奖 $200（注意要入到美股证券账户） · 完成交易再领 $10 · 美股永久 0 佣金 入金奖励按累计净入金分档：满 $1,000 拿 $50 股票现金卡，满 $2,000 拿 $100，满 $10,000 拿 $200。留存 30 天再激活，性价比最高的其实是 $2,000 这一档。 🧧 另外给粉丝额外争取了一份福利： 通过我的专属链接注册并完成美股认证，前 30 名可以额外拿 5 USDT 现金红包。需要先扫码进专属电报群，群里报账户 UID，审核通过后直接发到你的 BIT 美股账户。 👉 专属注册链接： https://t.co/kqf0oibPN2 或者下载 BIT App，注册页面填邀请码：GCSBTC 📢 Telegram 群（也可以扫下方图片二维码）： https://t.co/HZbVWv8LSN 美股波动本来就大，期权风险更高，别上头，仓位自己控制好。但工具该备的还是要备上——机会来的时候，账户已经开好的人才有得选。
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 76 interactions against 142K followers, an engagement rate of 0.053%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.526% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.6K interactions, about 100x its own typical post.
- What is Crypto攻城狮's engagement rate on X?
- Crypto攻城狮 (@gcsbtc) has an engagement rate of 0.053%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 141,585 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.053%, Crypto攻城狮 sits above the 25th percentile of the 217,745 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @gcsbtc have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @gcsbtc post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.