Back to @goldman's profile

Jason Goldman engagement report

@goldman - 872K followers on X

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.049%
of 872K followers
Per impression
0.855%
49K views on a typical post
Reach
5.68%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
423
interactions (median)
Saved
0.089%
44 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.43/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 423 interactions against 872K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 49K times each, and 0.855% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 97x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #espn, #llws, #patmcafee.

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #espn, #llws, #patmcafee.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jason Goldman's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.049%, Jason Goldman sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 14, 202697x their median

    "ESPN personality Pat McAfee released an album of original music on Friday. Critics say if the album is played backwards, the listener could hear hidden demonic messages. More worrying still, if the album is played forward, the listener could hear original music by Pat McAfee." https://t.co/TTAUzFf8BD

    37K3.6K1591001.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202665x their median

    THE GREATEST LL MOUND VISIT OF ALL TIME!! “If you walk the next 5 batters Jesus is still lord,if you strikeout the next 5 batters Jesus is still lord” 🙏🏻 ✝️🙏🏻✝️ #llws #espn #patmcafee https://t.co/T3ZiQhQI73

    24K2.1K88799013M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202658x their median

    Drug companies Moderna and Merck have just announced a vaccine that could stop cancer from spreading, funded with an mRNA NIH research grant. HHS Secretary RFK Jr. chose to end 22 similar mRNA research projects worth $500M in 2025. https://t.co/ECupDFcpgC

    19K5.2K364201440K viewsView on X
  • Jan 29, 202615x their median

    There are people who hate clutter and there are people who love to make little piles everywhere that they will get to later and these people marry each other.

    21K852185192838K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202646x their median

    They’re calling it the best final jeopardy question of all time https://t.co/f6ry9bljCl

    18K6745311254.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202622x their median

    a sister *bang bang* a witch *bang bang* and what was her sister? *bang bang* a princess *bang bang* the wicked witch of the east, bro *bang bang* https://t.co/6Pb0TTQsz1

    8.8K656611198K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202620x their median

    i’m actually on woke 3. i have a few invite codes left, dm me if you want one. you’re not gonna believe the new takes this baby comes with

    7.7K553307114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202613x their median

    this dsa co chair lays out the dsa ideal for palestine. when the interviewer mentions that the dsa ideal resembles what bill clinton was trying to broker at the 2000 camp david summit, she goes blank bc she does not know what that is. holy fuck. https://t.co/12dftmIKZc

    4.7K610221126442K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202613x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: The Met Police carried out a controlled explosion on an unattended car outside St Pancras "Following a controlled explosion, it has been declared non-suspicious"

    5.0K1541723015.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202610x their median

    🚨FOURTH OUT MISTAKE!!!🚨 NO WAY!!! @RedSox at @BlueJays and in the 7th Boston has first and third and one out. Ceddanne Rafaela hits a fly to center and both runners forget there was one out and just ran without tagging up. After the ball was caught, the Blue Jays threw the ball in and doubled off the runner at first, for an inning ending double play. Since the runner from third scored BEFORE the third out, the run counts because this is not a force, but a timing play. What Toronto SHOULD have done is after the out at first, they legally could have thrown to third and appealed that that runner left early. This would have been the elusive FOURTH OUT and this would have replaced the third out and nullified the run. Once all the infielders crossed the foul line, the ability to appeal the play was lost, and once that happened, the run was officially counted. #DieryWater #BlueJays50

    3.9K318133122573K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#espn#llws#patmcafee

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 423 interactions against 872K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 49K times each, and 0.855% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 97x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #espn, #llws, #patmcafee.

What is Jason Goldman's engagement rate on X?
Jason Goldman (@goldman) has an engagement rate of 0.049%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 871,627 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.049%, Jason Goldman sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @goldman have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @goldman post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going