Back to @greengirlbella_'s profile

Bella 🌹 engagement report

@greengirlbella_ - 404K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.013%
of 404K followers
Per impression
0.314%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
4.29%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
54
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.87/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 54 interactions against 404K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.314% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 16% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 142K interactions, about 2626x its own typical post.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Bella 🌹's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, Bella 🌹 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 20262626x their median

    🚨🔵⚪️ BREAKING: Gabriel Martinelli to Al Hilal, here we go! Verbal agreement done for fee over €65m add-ons included. Martinelli will sign a long term deal as he just had authorization to travel in 24h. Watkins + Martinelli, plan confirmed. Deal agreed - @MatteMoretto. 🫱🏻‍🫲🏼🇧🇷 https://t.co/rkN5UNdNoE

    117K13K4.0K7.9K16M viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20092412x their median

    We're in the trenches guys!

    70K46K3.4K11KView on X
  • Aug 6, 2026653x their median

    Sabrina Carpenter says she won’t date a man unless he knows the lyrics to every one of her songs: “Fan first. Boyfriend second.” https://t.co/7aD8gaTmxp

    32K1.3K1.0K1.2K4.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026216x their median

    Arsenal are set to make £78.5million in transfer fees ahead of deadline day on Tuesday. 🇧🇷 Gabriel Jesus > Barcelona 🇵🇹 Fabio Vieira > Hamburg 🇧🇷 Gabriel Martinelli > Al Hilal Big incoming pending? 👀 https://t.co/dt7xWdk7wx

    11K817157125347K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 2026206x their median

    Ben White & Héctor Bellerín share a moment in the tunnel before kick-off. 🥹❤️ 🎥 @sivvep https://t.co/rsGqRDLpf1

    11K4243836291K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026184x their median

    Wdym you can get married at the Emirates? hello??? ME AND WHO https://t.co/r78w5Jemn5

    8.5K893694752.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20264.7x their median

    Having to jump through hoops and learn different algorithms, TOS, adapting to new accounts constantly, trying just to be seen and feeling like I'm playing minesweeper whenever I post. This is exhausting.

    217829135K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20262.3x their median

    FINALLY!! Bruno Guimarães to Arsenal!!!!!

    11642017K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20261.6x their median

    I’ve been finding it really hard to get involved with football this season start since my grandad died…. It feels too painful so I’m sorry

    72012014K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20261.5x their median

    I saw a post the other day that says “youre always someone’s reason to masturbate” and I fully love that

    7822118K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 54 interactions against 404K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.314% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 16% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 142K interactions, about 2626x its own typical post.

What is Bella 🌹's engagement rate on X?
Bella 🌹 (@greengirlbella_) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 404,266 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, Bella 🌹 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @greengirlbella_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @greengirlbella_ post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going