Back to @growing_daniel's profile

Daniel engagement report

@growing_daniel - 440K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.14%
of 440K followers
Per impression
1.47%
42K views on a typical post
Reach
9.50%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
615
interactions (median)
Saved
0.06%
25 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.37/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 615 interactions against 440K followers, an engagement rate of 0.14%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 1.47% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 39% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.5K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Daniel's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 62% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.14%, Daniel sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 202612x their median

    At my nuclear weapons startup we have just one rule: move fast and break shit

    7.1K27311323126K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20268.4x their median

    🚨 SHOTS FIRED NEAR JEWISH SUMMER CAMP: Nathan Hewett, 36, fired roughly 20 rounds from a semi-automatic rifle near Camp Modin in Maine, sending 400+ campers and staff into lockdown. Shell casings suggested shots may have been fired toward the camp’s basketball court. Deputies seized 23 firearms from Hewett, who was suspected of antisemitic bias. He was arrested but is shockingly already out on bail.

    3.5K1.2K346171381K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.3x their median

    SF Ladies, please take note - next week will be a great dating pool cleanse. All the dark triad men (poly, addicted to k, and want to be a DJ) will be at Burning Man

    4.1K17510650215K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.4x their median

    Eliezer on encountering Leopold, which some of you will enjoy: https://t.co/YeEGFaIUuO

    2.5K588572601K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.0x their median

    BREAKING: The SEC has launched an investigation into the trading of Leopold Aschenbrenner's Situational Awareness fund, per NYT. The SEC sent subpoenas to multiple banks that gave Situational Awareness money to trade with, asking for details about the timing of trades and how Situational Awareness communicated with lenders.

    2.1K14714159919K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.0x their median

    The AI girlfriend thing is not taking off like I would’ve assumed three years ago. That sector is performing far below my projection

    2.1K3527153219K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.9x their median

    RIP Steve Jobs you would've loved eating fruit instead of taking this https://t.co/RxH5hs6HPH

    1.7K4625742K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.7x their median

    Life Church counts down to their Sunday service by playing Aerosmith's 'Dream On' while 'Avengers' plays behind them, because why the heck not? https://t.co/UBGBCAHfem

    1.2K532041371.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.5x their median

    To this day, I believe Zach Hill literally enslaved a demon and uses it to play drums https://t.co/PojeUb0YeV

    1.3K91731085K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.1x their median

    Congratulations. You just created a million Dolly Partons

    1.2K4420630K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 615 interactions against 440K followers, an engagement rate of 0.14%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 1.47% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 39% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.5K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is Daniel's engagement rate on X?
Daniel (@growing_daniel) has an engagement rate of 0.14%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 439,665 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.14%, Daniel sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @growing_daniel have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @growing_daniel post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going