Back to @h5LPyKL7TP6jjop's profile

老司机 engagement report

@h5LPyKL7TP6jjop - 393K followers on X

Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.033%
of 393K followers
Per impression
0.968%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
3.46%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
132
interactions (median)
Saved
0.055%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 132 interactions against 393K followers, an engagement rate of 0.033%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 3,775 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.968% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 51x its own typical post.

Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

老司机's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,775 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.033%, 老司机 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Mar 13, 201951x their median

    批评是批评家天生的使命!他们只感知对错,信奉真理,指出真相不吐不快,不在意权势和群众的喜好,从批评里不可能获得任何好处,但批评家愚直不改。在中国几乎所有人都讨厌批评家,喜欢阴谋家,因为他们只说好听的!可是就因为中国的批评家太少,中国几乎看不到未来和希望!

    3.4K1.2K2.0K61View on X
  • Aug 21, 20266.5x their median

    浦东机场查出国“吓死人” 一航班半数人禁止登机 离北京出入境新规正式实施只剩下不到一个月,一名网友突然爆料:8月18日他从上海浦东机场飞往西雅图,办理登机时被要求填写一份内容惊人的出境登记表。更夸张的是,旅客被要求交出手机,检查聊天软件和社交媒体。结果同一航班竟然有一半旅客被拦下。如果情况属实,浦东机场究竟发生了什么? 9月15日之后出入境究竟会发生什么变化,已经成为越来越多中国人密切关注的焦点! 1、出境航班被拦下一半人!浦东机场动手了? 随着中共新的出入境管理规定距离9月15日正式实施越来越近,关于“出境越来越难”的各种消息,也开始在网络上密集出现。 最新,一位网友在社交平台发帖写道,8月18日从上海浦东机场搭乘航班前往西雅图,经历了一场让他“吓死人”的出境审查。帖子写道,17:24起飞,换登机牌时,机场工作人员要我填写出境信息表,完全没有隐私,写信息的时候,同航班好多人都僵住了,卡在表格这。目测同机的人有一半禁止登机,起飞时座位空了一半,一片哀嚎声。我前面有个人在被问话中,查看他手机、社交媒体、聊天软件,没发现任何问题也被扣了,不让飞。警察说了,这个手机APP都是新装日期,是备用机,你常用手机呢?那个人支支吾吾彻底慌了,被带走了。到我的时候,首先问我是如实填写的吗?我回答是,然后把我手机和其他20个人的手机,要求解锁,一批拿去小黑屋过人工和机器!帖子迅速引发关注。 这个帖子之所以迅速引发关注,真正刺激公众神经的,并不只是“到底有多少人没能登机”,而是一个更大的问题:出境到底什么时候开始,变成了对个人手机、社交账号和私人信息的全面审查? 按照着这名网友晒出的一份《上海浦东国际机场出境登记表》,表格要求填写的内容包括个人基本信息、出境目的、行程信息等;更加敏感的是,还涉及家庭成员情况。包括配偶姓名、身份证、工作职务,子女姓名、出生日期、学校、国籍,甚至父母、岳父母、公婆、兄弟姐妹等信息。在境外关系一栏,还要求填写境外身份、境外亲友等情况。 更加引发争议的是所谓“网络与社交媒体”栏目,据称涉及海外社交媒体账号、互联网行为、常用浏览器、服务器、境外网站等信息,甚至还有个人资产情况。 如果这份表格确实是在机场大规模使用,那么问题就非常值得追问:一个普通人出境,为什么需要把自己、配偶、子女、父母、亲属、海外关系、网络行为乃至个人资产,全部交代清楚?这已经不是简单的“查护照”了,它真正触及的,是个人隐私和出境自由的边界。 海外时评人士罗翔认为,正常的出境安全检查当然可以理解,但如果要求旅客填写大量个人信息,逐一检查手机,甚至查看社交媒体和聊天软件,那么就必须有明确的法律依据、清晰的操作程序以及有效监督。否则,所谓“安全检查”一旦失去边界,就很容易从必要的安全措施变成对个人隐私的过度干预。尤其让普通人感到无助的是:一个人明明已经买好了机票,办理了登机手续,到了最后一刻却突然被拦下。你甚至不知道自己究竟违反了什么规定。更不知道,到底是谁决定不让你走,又有没有申诉和救济的渠道。 就在这个帖子出现之前,另一名网友也自称在深圳出境时遭遇审查。他表示,自己过去10年出入境一直没有发生问题,这一次却突然被带进一个很小的房间。工作人员要求他把背包和手机放在桌上,不能手拿,也不能讲话,两名工作人员站在门口盯着他十几分钟。他询问自己到底出了什么问题,对方只回答两个字:审查。十几分钟后,他被告知可以出境。这名网友感慨,自己40年前入籍时就已经放弃中国国籍,因此认为对方没有理由扣住自己,但这次经历仍然让他感到害怕,并表示以后“不回国了”。 如果这些个案属实,那么它们至少说明一个问题:现在越来越多人开始担心的,已经不是“怎么出去”,而是“还能不能出去”。而这个焦虑,又恰好发生在9月15日新的《关于出境入境管理的规定》即将实施之 评论人士“中美对标”认为,这次官方的出境入境管理规定,与旧规相比,最重要的变化,不是怎样让你更方便地出国,而是怎样不让你走。真正让人焦虑的不是纸面上多了十九条,而是过去被散落在不同法律里的边控权,终于被连接成了一张网。正如一位网友评论,这两个月,先是限制资金外流,然后限制技术外流,追海外收入税,现在肉身也限制了。出不去的基本都出不去了,无论是钱还是人,只能闷在国内,耳畔响起一声响彻天空的喝斥“缴枪不杀”。 (资源来自《文学城》)

    60712411411111K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.7x their median

    泽连斯基8月26日通报,乌克兰武装人员一昼夜之内袭击了俄罗斯境内16处目标 他向所有参与行动的军人致谢,肯定作战行动取得的成果 泽连斯基表示:“战争必须回到它爆发的源头,我们正以合理的方式削弱俄罗斯的侵略潜力” https://t.co/ndSAzasJlS

    5304449023K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.2x their median

    盐城晚上再次发生巨响,己连续多日,官方对草芥不说明,不解释。 牛马羊心惊,只有猪认为主人强大,放心憨睡。 https://t.co/VsB4RR8VaP

    261372552214K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.1x their median

    2026年8月28日凌晨乌克兰无人机袭击了俄罗斯雅罗斯拉夫尔州的斯拉夫石油-雅诺斯炼油厂(Slavneft-YANOS,也称雅罗斯拉夫尔炼油厂),厂区发生火灾并升起浓烟。 该厂是俄罗斯最大炼油厂之一(常被列为前五),年加工能力约1500万吨原油,主要生产汽油、柴油、航空煤油等,位于莫斯科东北约250–280公里处,是中部地区重要燃油供应节点。这次是该厂2026年至少第8次遭袭

    4594439122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.1x their median

    乌克兰FP‑1无人机在莫斯科上空自由飞行 Fire Point研发的FP‑1远程攻击无人机,战斗部可达120公斤,航程超1600公里,该无人机可突破多层电子战系统与“铠甲”防空系统,对莫斯科战略目标实施精准打击。 网友辣评:希望俄罗斯保持克制,冷静处理争议,通过外交途径解决问题。😂😂😂😂 https://t.co/3XcdDfN8Xk

    4293766421K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.1x their median

    眼见战势不妙,央妈亲自下场开始神助功:俄罗斯未日武器出现!波塞冬核潜艇9 0小时航程1万公里!航速100节!在水下一路火花带闪电就飞到月球上去了?它俄爹都不敢这么吹!让网友一顿嘲讽…… https://t.co/vl0aiZDFRv

    34333158178K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.6x their median

    美国佬不讲武德,你这样搞,我们怎么抄?还怎么弯道超车?还怎么遙遙领先? https://t.co/Ksy9pMc1h0

    3455676264K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.5x their median

    乌军2天连炸6座Ozon仓,野莓己炸光了,这是要逼疯普大帝呵! 消息在中文跨境电商圈快速传播,确实引发“转FBS尽快”的讨论。平台仓(FBO)货物直接面临损毁风险,且平台合同多已更新不可抗力条款(含无人机袭击),损失常由卖家承担。改FBS(卖家自行履约/本地发货)可降低集中仓储风险,但仍需注意物流、时效与成本。此前Wildberries类似袭击已导致大量卖家损失与模式调整。

    3853642223K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.2x their median

    利曼战场最新战况:俄军一个多师被乌军合围! 2026年8月下旬(约8月25–29日)利曼以北、热烈别茨河西岸存在俄军突出部(桥头堡),主要由俄第20集团军第144摩步师等部队构成。乌军第3军(含第3突击旅、第60机械化旅等)自2026年5月起持续反击,目标是从北、南两侧压缩并切断该突出部,而非直接强攻利曼城本身。 地图上的地点与近期公开报道高度吻合: • 北侧:Nove、Zelena Dolyna、Karpivka、Korovii Yar • 西/西南:Shandryholove、Serednje • 南侧:Kolodyazi、Ivanivka、Stavky 战场分析人士(Thorkill、AMK Mapping等)指出,乌军已形成钳形,最近处走廊只剩约2.6–6.2公里,俄军已从部分西侧阵地(如Yarova一带)部分后撤。俄方后勤通道(公路、河上补给)受压,桥头堡面临被进一步孤立的风险。 整体态势是:乌军在该方向掌握主动,俄军突出部被压缩、补给困难,对利曼和后续斯拉维扬斯克方向构成压力缓解。俄军如不能解决后勤问题和有援军支持,估计有被全歼可能!

    3553426122K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 132 interactions against 393K followers, an engagement rate of 0.033%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 3,775 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.968% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 51x its own typical post.

What is 老司机's engagement rate on X?
老司机 (@h5LPyKL7TP6jjop) has an engagement rate of 0.033%, based on the median interactions across 56 original posts from the last 30 days against 393,381 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.033%, 老司机 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @h5LPyKL7TP6jjop have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,775 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @h5LPyKL7TP6jjop post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going