Hayden Adams 🦄 engagement report
@haydenzadams - 2.2M followers on X
Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 513 interactions against 2.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 3,881 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 86K times each, and 0.598% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 119K interactions, about 233x its own typical post.
Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Hayden Adams 🦄's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,881 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.024%, Hayden Adams 🦄 sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.438% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 159.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 49K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 53K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 62K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 71K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 74K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 89K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 97K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 100K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 104K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 101K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 94K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 87K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 82K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 68K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 59K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 236K |
| Monday | 0% | 298K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 295K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 255K |
| Thursday | -1% | 249K |
| Friday | -3% | 257K |
| Saturday | +3% | 231K |
Best tweets
- Dec 29, 2025233x their median
wealth managers putting your money in an index fund https://t.co/StHHYx8Gf7
- Aug 14, 202617x their median
We’ve written an FAQ to answer some of the questions we've received about watermarking. In summary: • We’re implementing watermarking to comply with the EU AI Act. Other major model developers have signed the same Code of Practice and will also be implementing watermarking; • Our watermarking method doesn’t have any practical impact on the quality or content of Claude’s outputs; • The difference between watermarked and un-watermarked text will not be distinguishable to readers; • Nothing is added to the text and there are no hidden characters; • Watermarking doesn’t require extra tokens, and will not be more expensive; • Watermarks can’t be traced to a specific person, organization, or chat. Read more: https://t.co/G76iUOJ7Hu
- Aug 4, 202611x their median
Countdown starts now https://t.co/9fqa8AnC7U https://t.co/ez6yBMKqAN
- Aug 5, 20263.6x their median
gonna be another ~hour appreciate the patience and stay tuned
- Aug 5, 20262.6x their median
Fudders out in force with various narratives based more on bags then truth Meanwhile $150m traded on https://t.co/kZ4CsDjQfy before it even launched Still in beta and getting way more traffic then expected so ui has some rough spots but they’ll be fixed soon 🐸
- Aug 6, 20262.2x their median
Everyone in my replies right now https://t.co/2scLLhI6dS
- Aug 12, 20262.1x their median
smol announcement test tokens while building Pools no longer carry any creator fee path back to Uniswap Labs all creator fees (past and future) now route to a programmatic buyback and burn: fees release as ETH, and anyone can claim that ETH by burning the token
- Aug 7, 20262.0x their median
welp uniswap launchpad is kinda a nothing burger so far launchpads are commodities now and the only differentiator is marketing you can’t enter the launchpad game in 2026 and expect to grow without helping the coins themselves grow idk why i thought it would be different
- Aug 6, 20262.0x their median
The technical design for auto-compounding liquidity is pretty sexy and a personal contribution of mine to https://t.co/fr2Dy4haAC How it works: The liquidity position is deposited into a smart contract with one simple rule - anyone can withdraw all unclaimed fees for that position, as long as they increase the size of that liquidity position by 0.2% So fees grow over time and the moment they're worth more than 0.2% of the liquidity, a searcher is naturally incentivized to add 0.2% to the pool and claim the fees Its a super simple, clean mechanism based on the Uniswap token jar And honestly it would work for automcompounding regular Uniswap LP positions to. So we're adding it to the roadmap!!
- Aug 13, 20262.0x their median
People are making two compounding mistakes when evaluating DeFi apps right now: 1) Market Size: People think they are targeting the $2 trillion crypto market when they are actually targeting the $500 trillion asset market. 2) Value Capture: People think they have maximized fee generation when they are actually just scratching the surface. These things -- Hyperliquid, Uniswap, Aave, Morpho, Aerodrome, Lighter, Pump, and more -- have bigger TAMs and more pricing power than people believe.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 513 interactions against 2.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 3,881 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 86K times each, and 0.598% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 119K interactions, about 233x its own typical post.
- What is Hayden Adams 🦄's engagement rate on X?
- Hayden Adams 🦄 (@haydenzadams) has an engagement rate of 0.024%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,168,361 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.024%, Hayden Adams 🦄 sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @haydenzadams have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,881 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @haydenzadams post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.8 posts per day across the measured window.