Frank Hoogerbeets engagement report
@hogrbe - 1.3M followers on X
Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 389 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 74K times each, and 0.523% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 42K interactions, about 107x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #earthquake, #colombia, #cali.
Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #earthquake, #colombia, #cali.
Compared with accounts its own size
Frank Hoogerbeets 's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.03%, Frank Hoogerbeets sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.435% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 158.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 54K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 49K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 53K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 71K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 73K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 80K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 88K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 96K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 99K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 103K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 100K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 92K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 86K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 81K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 75K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 67K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 58K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 234K |
| Monday | 0% | 294K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 288K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 253K |
| Thursday | -2% | 247K |
| Friday | -3% | 256K |
| Saturday | +3% | 230K |
Best tweets
- Jun 19, 2026107x their median
על כל דמעה של אמא ישראלית, אלף אמהות לבנוניות צריכות לבכות. לבנון כולה צריכה לבעור! עם כל הכבוד לאמריקאים, ישראל חייבת להבהיר לעולם כולו שדם בנינו וביטחון אזרחנו איננו הפקר. לבנון כולה צריכה לבעור. חובתנו העליונה היא להגן על אזרחי ישראל ועל חיילי צה״ל, והמחויבות הזו קודמת לכל שיקול אחר. אמרתי לראש הממשלה, גם בישיבות בינינו: על כל דמעה של אמא ישראלית, אלף אימהות לבנוניות צריכות לבכות. מספיק עם הפינג־פונג. במזרח התיכון לא מנצחים בתגובות מדודות ובהכלה - צריך להשתגע. למחוק. להכריע את הטרור.
- Aug 26, 202617x their median
No matter how far we progress, humans will always remain powerless before the forces of nature..... https://t.co/TBYO7WdP1u
- Nov 2, 20239.5x their median
Annexing Palestinian land was their plan since 1948. Israeli minister Amichai Eliyahu: "North Gaza is more beautiful than ever. Blowing up and flattening everything is great. When we are done, we will hand over the lands of Gaza to soldiers & settlers who lived in Gush Katif." https://t.co/jBlDX2WF25
- Aug 16, 20265.6x their median
Earthquake model reveals that tectonic stress in #California is at a record level. Similar to #Venezuela, there have been no major earthquakes in parts of Southern California since 1812. This is definitely something to keep in mind. https://t.co/jlAPv945Xe
- Aug 11, 20262.8x their median
Slowly but surely Romania is heading towards the next ~M 7.0-7.9 earthquake in the Vrancea seismic zone. It's been 40 years since the last one (M 7.2, 1986). Previous gaps reached ~37 years (M 7.7, 1940 - M 7.5, 1977). Strongest known quake was ~M 7.9 in 1802. https://t.co/TK2W0am2xX
- Aug 20, 20262.8x their median
Small but notable seismic activity (~M 3.2 and ~M 3.1) near Princes’ Islands in the Sea of Marmara, yesterday and today. https://t.co/BkdySCfsVL
- Aug 7, 20262.4x their median
NEW INTERVIEW: Courtney Bonneau (@cbonneauimages) — A War Correspondent in Lebanon “The war broke out. I stayed. For me this is a chance to collect evidence against the IDF… It’s everyone’s responsibility to intervene in a genocide if we can.” https://t.co/eH1Q3AhVhv
- Aug 7, 20262.2x their median
SITUATION REMAINS CRITICAL - HAVE AN EARTHQUAKE PLAN https://t.co/rOGj5WqOna
- Aug 27, 20262.1x their median
How Grifters Twist Nepal’s Natural Glacier Avalanche to Blame Fossil Fuels. Avalanches and earthquakes are relatively common in the Himalaya and recently drove Langtang Lirung’s glacier collapses. For example, on the south-facing side of Langtang Lirung, a 7.8 earthquake caused an avalanche that destroyed the village of Langtang in 2015 (graphic B). On August 26th, 2026 another tragic avalanche happened on its north-facing side. A block of ice and rock, one km wide by 1.5 km long and as much as 200 m thick, fell 1.2 kilometers to the valley floor, causing the earth to shake so severely, it was first believed that an earthquake had triggered the avalanche. That mistaken attribution was used by a grifting washed-up TV weatherman Gloninger to suggest earthquakes did not cause the Himalayan glacier’s instabilities, so it must be climate change. Likewise, socialists on X like @Communist977, @ProudSocialist, socialist @ClaudiaWebbe and radical environmentalists and many more were quick to post about this Nepal tragedy as evidence of failed economies that burn fossil fuels. However, science provides a far more naturalistic understanding. Although an earthquake may not have triggered the recent devastating avalanche, earthquakes had certainly set the stage for it. Because plate tectonics are still driving India into Asia and uplifting the Himalaya, earthquake events of magnitude 4 or less, occur frequently across the Himalaya. Often daily somewhere along the range. Moderate earthquakes occur every few years in central Nepal and have produced noticeable shaking in the Langtang valley. Such shaking fractures existing glaciers, and creates large, unstable blocks of glacial ice (seracs) formed by intersecting deep cracks (crevasses) that create instabilities that later lead to a glacier’s collapse. The continual Himalayan uplift also created differing topographies on south-facing and north-facing slopes. The south side where the 2015 avalanched occurred experiences a progressive mass loss and thinning glaciers, typical of monsoon-influenced warming. The north-side, where the 2026 avalanche happened, consists of extremely steep cliffs with hanging glaciers that are far more vulnerable to destabilization. Langtang’s steep faces and hanging glaciers produce avalanches frequently, ranging from small, regular ice falls to rare, valley-reaching events. In contrast to ignorant grifting alarmists who blame fossil fuel warming for shrinking glaciers and glacier instabilities, the adjacent Karakoram mountain range (graphic A) has experienced very stable and growing glaciers. Global warming can’t drive both changes! Grifters, with limited scientific understanding, have been quick to argue a warming trend created melt water that lubricates the glacier-ground interface and destabilizes the glaciers. Grifters like Gloninger claim temperatures have warmed 50% faster in this region, as if that is the only evidence needed to blame burning fossil fuels. However, on Langtang Lirung, at the 5200 meter elevation where the rock-ice block first separated to start the 2026 avalanche, the average summer temperature is still below freezing at -6°C to -8°C (21°F to 17°F). During the warmest summer period, mid-day averages reach 2°C to 6°C (36°F to 43°F) but night temperatures stay near -2°C to -5°C (28°F to 23°F). Furthermore, science suggests air temperatures are not affecting the surface ice. The top few meters of a glacier, rapidly respond to air temperature, sunshine, and seasons. Nonetheless winter cold and summer warmth only penetrate about 10–20 m from the glaciers’ surface. Thus, changes in atmospheric temperature are unlikely to provide “lubricating” melt water in 200-meter thick glaciers. Below the shallow “seasonal layer,” temperature is steady and often close to the local mean annual air temperature, which again averages summer temperature below freezing at -6°C to -8°C (21°F to 17°F). Still studies show the glacier-ground interface is almost always warmer than the ice above it for 3 main reasons: 1) Because ice is such a good insulator, the geothermal heat rising from Earth’s interior accumulates at the glacier’s bottom. 2) frictional heat from ice sliding over rock adds to the temperature. 3) Under thick ice, the melting point is lower due to pressure effects. So even if the surface is –30 °C or colder, the bed of a 2–3 km ice sheet can sit at or very near 0 °C. Global warming is not a factor. It is true that ice frozen into the rocks and sediments can act like glue that holds the sediments together. There are studies that show a change in surface temperature from -10°C to 0°C can weaken that “ice glue” by 78%. Still, that doesn’t mean, CO2 warmed air temperatures have caused the un-gluing” instability. The science suggests geothermal heat the most likely cause of any temperature changes causing instabilities in the glacier-ground interface
- Aug 1, 20261.9x their median
In August 2026 Earth will be closely aligned between Venus, Saturn and Neptune, which will cause high lunar peaks throughout the month. Be prepared... https://t.co/dBfkMr2ghC
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 389 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 74K times each, and 0.523% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 42K interactions, about 107x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #earthquake, #colombia, #cali.
- What is Frank Hoogerbeets 's engagement rate on X?
- Frank Hoogerbeets (@hogrbe) has an engagement rate of 0.03%, based on the median interactions across 52 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,308,594 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.03%, Frank Hoogerbeets sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @hogrbe have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @hogrbe post?
- Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.27 posts per day across the measured window.