Back to @iaara_182's profile

iaaraS2 engagement report

@iaara_182 - 938K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.625%
of 938K followers
Per impression
11.8%
50K views on a typical post
Reach
5.29%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.838%
416 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.03/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 5.9K interactions against 938K followers, an engagement rate of 0.625%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 11.8% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

iaaraS2's engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.625%, iaaraS2 sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.435% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 15, 20263.7x their median

    VAMOS ARGENTINA LCDSRPM https://t.co/jS0Ij03I9H

    21K28015610292K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20262.0x their median

    https://t.co/aaWf9h194Z

    11K155362108K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 2026

    https://t.co/Ka02afR9I3

    8.6K12826078K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 2026

    https://t.co/qUI3JrtF1w

    8.2K9447274K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    https://t.co/kgGnkCuty4

    8.0K11351152K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 2026

    https://t.co/GNPL1mFJK3

    7.9K11536181K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 2026

    https://t.co/zPlo5pHqBL

    7.8K11939165K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 2026

    https://t.co/n4odGCVyck

    7.8K11142282K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 2026

    https://t.co/4oPeU3Oj7K

    7.8K10417054K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    https://t.co/2wqTLdxvXE

    7.7K9456161K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5.9K interactions against 938K followers, an engagement rate of 0.625%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 11.8% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

What is iaaraS2's engagement rate on X?
iaaraS2 (@iaara_182) has an engagement rate of 0.625%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 938,173 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.625%, iaaraS2 sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @iaara_182 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @iaara_182 post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going