Back to @injective's profile

Injective 🥷 engagement report

@injective - 539K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.078%
of 539K followers
Per impression
2.10%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
3.71%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
422
interactions (median)
Saved
0.027%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 422 interactions against 539K followers, an engagement rate of 0.078%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 2.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.72% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 956 interactions, about 2.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Injective 🥷's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.078%, Injective 🥷 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.432%
p902.10%
p99161.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,378 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.432%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile161.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 20262.3x their median

    Injective now has 🏛️ SEC Transfer Agent Registration 🇪🇺 MiCA in the EU 💡 The largest global enterprises such as LG tokenizing assets with $INJ 🪙 A unified stablecoin standard used by multiple blockchains 🤖 A novel AI SDK for deploying groundbreaking dApps 🥷 Motion

    763126402747K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.0x their median

    Injective just became the first layer-1 blockchain to officially obtain a transfer agent registration with the SEC. A transfer agent is fundamental to public securities markets. It maintains the official record of who owns an issuer’s securities. It updates that record when ownership changes, helps manage issuances and cancellations, and supports distributions and shareholder communications. For tokenized securities, this function connects the movement of an asset onchain with the official record of ownership. This directly enables Injective to spearhead a new era of institutional-grade tokenization that combines regulatory capabilities with Injective's robust onchain finance stack for internet capital markets to scale.

    649110343529K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20261.6x their median

    Injective is now the first layer 1 blockchain to be a SEC registered transfer agent. Tokenized funds, equities, private company shares, and enterprise receivables now connect to the regulated recordkeeping layer U.S. markets require. Below are some of the top developments that happened on Injective this past week 👇 🟪 Injective officially became the first layer 1 blockchain with an SEC registered transfer agent, adding crucial regulatory rails for tokenized asset issuance. 🟪 Injective Mint, Injective Institutional Services, and native financial modules now connect issuance, compliance, ownership records, settlement, and onchain utility in one stack. 🟪 Injective dApps now support onchain perpetual markets across crypto, FX, equities, pre IPO assets, and exotics, with open market creation built into the network. 📊 Other News 🟪 More than 50 teams used Injective at @adventurex_plan. A new wave of dApps are coming to Injective spanning tokenization, stablecoins and perpetuals. 🟪 @HelixMarkets officially crossed $80 billion in cumulative trading volume. 🟪 @hydro_fi brought stablecoins, LSTs, $INJ, and $HDRO into Hydro Lending so more assets can move through one productive capital market. The rails are live. Build the next market with us.

    56982221728K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.6x their median

    Injective in the past few weeks: ✅Official SEC Transfer Agent Registration ✅Korea's largest trading company POSCO AND LG CNS launch tokenization pilot with Injective ✅$INJ listed on @RobinhoodCrypto ✅MiCA Whitepaper in the EU ✅@krakenfx integrates Injective USDC ✅@coinbase integrates native $INJ ✅Injective Summit with U.S. Senate, major financial institutions and members of Congress ✅Linux x402 Foundation invites Injective as a core member ✅@Bitwise becomes an Injective validator ✅Injective crosses 3 billion transactions ✅Brand new Injective website ✅AI Agent SDK release on Injective Much more L O A D I N G

    51789222945K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    Injective just became the first layer-1 blockchain to become a SEC registered transfer agent. Registration as a transfer agent with the SEC gives Injective far more than a regulatory credential. It removes a major barrier to faster institutional adoption. Institutions need more than fast settlement. They need an authoritative record of ownership that supports issuance, transfers, distributions, shareholder communications, and other core securities functions. Injective can now connect those requirements directly with assets moving onchain. In turn this provides: fewer disconnected systems, clearer ownership records, and a more seamless path for issuers to bring tokenized securities to market. This is how institutional tokenization moves from experimentation to scale. Injective brings regulated recordkeeping and onchain finance into one stack. All powered by $INJ

    49781271017K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    Promises made. Promises kept. Injective's SEC Transfer Agent registration filing was made official in record time. A new era of onchain tokenization is up next. https://t.co/fnoAidkHwj

    50165221321K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    Big motion ahead https://t.co/vc7qQwlrNZ

    45154391539K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    The $INJ Community BuyBack returns this Wednesday! September's event is now worth over $168,000 Gear up 🥷 https://t.co/SeBpeRMi2Y

    44054301728K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Financial institutions have spent decades building separate systems for issuance, compliance, shareholder records, settlement, and market access. Tokenization creates an opportunity to bring those functions closer together. 🔷 Injective Mint - gives issuers configurable controls over asset creation and transfers. 🔷 Injective Institutional Services - adds a SEC registered transfer agent capability for ownership and transfer records. 🔷 Injective’s financial modules - provide infrastructure for settlement and onchain utility. The result is a clearer path from issuing a tokenized asset to using it across Internet capital markets at scale.

    43066192027K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Probably nothing. https://t.co/81vR33nokR

    4444532620K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 422 interactions against 539K followers, an engagement rate of 0.078%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 2.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.72% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 956 interactions, about 2.3x its own typical post.

What is Injective 🥷's engagement rate on X?
Injective 🥷 (@injective) has an engagement rate of 0.078%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 539,298 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.078%, Injective 🥷 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @injective have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @injective post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going