Back to @jeremyscahill's profile

jeremy scahill engagement report

@jeremyscahill - 429K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.062%
of 429K followers
Per impression
1.46%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
4.27%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
268
interactions (median)
Saved
0.06%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.5/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 268 interactions against 429K followers, an engagement rate of 0.062%. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 1.46% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 48K interactions, about 180x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.062%, jeremy scahill sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.438%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,459 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,523 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.438%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-3%100K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-4%101K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-1%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%236K
Monday0%298K
Tuesday-3%295K
Wednesday-1%255K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%257K
Saturday+3%231K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 7, 2026180x their median

    U.S. Central Command forces have begun launching a series of powerful strikes against Iran to impose heavy costs for targeting and attacking commercial shipping crewed by innocent civilians in an international waterway. The U.S. strikes are in response to Iranian attacks on three commercial vessels that were transiting the Strait of Hormuz. Iran’s demonstrated aggression was unwarranted, dangerous, and a clear violation of the ceasefire.

    36K7.3K3.9K1.5K5.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 202633x their median

    Trump now claiming that the US will seize the Strait of Hormuz and charge fees for passage. Remember this next time a US official claims it is an illegal outrage for Iran to suggest it would charge fees https://t.co/jsWjKr9jNe

    6.7K1.8K26689323K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 202428x their median

    I'm leaving The Intercept and starting @DropSiteNews. https://t.co/bk1CY5jmQX https://t.co/DEzx9LvgIo

    5.7K1.1K4891621.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 202625x their median

    ⚡️Iran Sent Message to JD Vance Warning that Kushner and Witkoff Were “Abusing” Their Inside Access to Negotiations A senior Iranian official said Tehran privately told Vance the pair were exploiting the negotiations for financial gain. White House denies https://t.co/2bEX4FRAFD

    4.7K1.7K14578558K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20267.4x their median

    "Iran calculated that profits from [Iran war-related market] manipulation had reached $9 billion and formally requested, in writing, that Iran should share in the proceeds. 'We have conveyed through intermediaries that $4.5 billion of this sum should also be allocated to the Iranian side,' the Iranian official said. 'The exchanged texts will ultimately become part of the historical record.'" https://t.co/9XCw3BeYWj

    1.5K4623620113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20264.9x their median

    Israel's Brutal Retaliation Against Imprisoned Palestinian Doctors Seeking Legal Appeals The escalated abuse of Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya following a legal challenge to his detention sent a chilling message to the families of detained Gaza medical workers https://t.co/2Hw64wWo4m

    82545921520K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20262.7x their median

    Dead or Detained? Families in Gaza Search for Their Loved Ones With over 9,500 missing in Gaza, Palestinians search for family members under the rubble, in the "numbered graves cemetery," or in Israeli prisons. Story by @AbdSabbah91 & Mohamed Ahmed https://t.co/mAurbLFDpK

    48121414215K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20261.5x their median

    As the Board of Peace Cosplays Diplomacy, Israel Once Again Ramps Up Killing in Gaza Story by @AbdSabbah91 in Gaza and @sharifkouddous https://t.co/2Sn21ba6LY

    2571448116K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 2026

    WATCH: @DropSiteNews livestream starts now: We discuss the latest on Trump's renewed threats against Iran, speak with @RoKhanna about Israeli apartheid, and discuss the politics of the World Cup with Abdullah Al-Arian: https://t.co/6VOcQNNwxT

    1872637727K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 2026

    📺WATCH NOW: @DropSiteNews live stream— The Gaza “Ceasefire” Farce: Israel Vows to Continue Attacks and Occupation with @SamiAlArian: https://t.co/veD7zgtoDW

    87326014K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 268 interactions against 429K followers, an engagement rate of 0.062%. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 1.46% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 48K interactions, about 180x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is jeremy scahill's engagement rate on X?
jeremy scahill (@jeremyscahill) has an engagement rate of 0.062%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 428,606 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.062%, jeremy scahill sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jeremyscahill have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @jeremyscahill post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going