Back to @jimkwik's profile

Jim Kwik engagement report

@jimkwik - 378K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.009%
of 378K followers
Per impression
0.526%
6.3K views on a typical post
Reach
1.66%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
33
interactions (median)
Saved
0.064%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.2/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 33 interactions against 378K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Posts are seen about 6.3K times each, and 0.526% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 803x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #limitlessdaily.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, Jim Kwik sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Apr 28, 2016803x their median

    If you are reading this, thank you for connecting with me here.

    24K1.5K1.0K146View on X
  • Apr 24, 20268.0x their median

    AI doesn’t replace intelligence—it reveals it. It amplifies your thinking, scales your decisions, and accelerates your patterns—both strengths and blind spots. While artificial intelligence is growing exponentially, most people’s human intelligence is undertrained, underprotected, and underutilized.

    176404549.6K viewsView on X
  • Jan 18, 20265.3x their median

    Stop taking directions from people who have never been to the places you want to go. Seek counsel from those whose footsteps echo and carry the dust of the journey you desire.

    139181806.1K viewsView on X
  • Apr 27, 20264.1x their median

    Your brain deletes and prunes what you don’t use. So if you keep consuming without applying, you’re literally training yourself to forget.

    109141024.5K viewsView on X
  • Mar 6, 20264.1x their median

    What movie have you rewatched the most?

    35590512K viewsView on X
  • Mar 18, 20263.9x their median

    Most individuals are addicted to information and allergic to implementation. Absorb then Apply. Education x Execution = Empowerment.

    98151704.3K viewsView on X
  • Jun 20, 20263.3x their median

    Unpopular opinion: AI is creating a generation of intellectually malnourished people. Not because AI is bad. Because too many people are using it to replace thinking instead of amplify thinking. The danger isn't artificial intelligence. It's artificial competence.

    72142214.8K viewsView on X
  • Jan 17, 20263.1x their median

    Be so clear in your vision and so aligned with your actions that the outcome is inevitable.

    8014524.2K viewsView on X
  • May 26, 20262.9x their median

    Don’t chase success. Focus on and develop the mindset, skills and habits that make success inevitable.

    7213932.9K viewsView on X
  • May 10, 20262.9x their median

    Hello my name is Commitment. You may know my good friends Success and Greatness. We hangout a lot.

    73131014.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#limitlessdaily

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 33 interactions against 378K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Posts are seen about 6.3K times each, and 0.526% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 803x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Jim Kwik's engagement rate on X?
Jim Kwik (@jimkwik) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 377,586 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, Jim Kwik sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jimkwik have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @jimkwik post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going