Back to @jimmy_dore's profile

Jimmy Dore engagement report

@jimmy_dore - 733K followers on X

Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.845%
of 733K followers
Per impression
1.93%
321K views on a typical post
Reach
43.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.093%
299 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.13/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 6.2K interactions against 733K followers, an engagement rate of 0.845%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 321K times each, and 1.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 43.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 774K interactions, about 125x its own typical post.

Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jimmy Dore's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.845%, Jimmy Dore sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Apr 29, 2026125x their median

    And just like that… everybody stopped talking about the Epstein Files. https://t.co/qHQxP6GVw8

    614K153K3.6K2.6K50M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20266.1x their median

    Putin says he sometimes watches Western television just to understand what European audiences are being shown. And what he sees is “mass deception.” He gives a recent example. After an attack on Starobelsk that killed civilians, including children, Russia struck targets in the Kiev region in response. According to Putin, Western channels spent the entire day showing the Russian strikes: the destruction, the damage, the “Russian aggressor.” But not a word about what happened in Starobelsk before that. Not a word about the dead children. Then the narrative moves to Ukrainian drones, their military successes and how much those weapons cost. The message to European viewers follows naturally: pay more. Putin’s point is simple, and I completely agree with him: if you show the response while erasing what preceded it, you are manufacturing the story your audience is allowed to see.

    27K8.1K1.9K408805K viewsView on X
  • Mar 15, 20245.7x their median

    Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to social distance. You just did it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to stay home for two weeks. You just did it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they told you to mask up. You just did it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they told local businesses to close down. You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they pulled your kid out of school. You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they scared you with terms like “super spreader.” You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said you couldn’t visit the nursing home. You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said the funeral would have to be via Zoom call. You just went along with it. Didn’t ask for evidence when you followed the arrows on the floor at the grocery store. You just did it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they promised the shot was “safe and effective.” You just believed it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “Just the one shot.” You just went ahead and got it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “We meant two shots to get your life back.” You just went ahead and got it…again. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “Our bad, you’ll need a booster every year.” You just got back in line for more of it. Didn’t ask for evidence when they said “We meant boost a few times a year.” You just nodded your head in agreement because look how far you’ve come. You can’t go back now. Oh but if someone tells you any of that was horrible and wrong and it’s ruined millions of lives… you’re going to need to see some “evidence” of it. 🥴 👍

    26K8.0K1.4K5475.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20264.4x their median

    “The World Health Organization” now states on its website: “Vaccination against COVID-19 can trigger multiple sclerosis through cross-reactive CD4+-T cells that recognize the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and myelin peptides.” In other words: Your own immune system destroys the nerve pathways and then attacks your brain and spinal cord.

    17K9.1K560496850K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.0x their median

    Still can’t believe that The New York Times ADMITTED & PRINTED that the "conspiracy theorists" were right about COVID and that Fauci and the "experts" LIED to the public. What’s even more disturbing is how many people I know in Hollywood who are completely ignoring all this & don’t have the decency to APOLOGIZE to the people they viciously slandered & attacked for being skeptical of BiG Pharma & government during COVID. I can forgive the people who acted like monsters & we’re wrong about Covid, but they’ll NEVER forgive me for being right about Covid. @AnitaKrishna1 https://t.co/UAQs58Ud9U

    19K5.4K456237626K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.8x their median

    RFK JR: President Trump met with leading regenerative farmers in the Oval Office to discuss transitioning away from glyphosate on U.S. Crops—The Pilot program drew a MASSIVE 60,000 Farmer and Ranch applicants “We talked about how do we transition off of glyphosate and other chemicals toward a more sustainable kind of agriculture.” @SecKennedy @realannapaulina https://t.co/0h6s0wljJa

    13K3.9K268211356K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.4x their median

    THEY INJECTED YOU WITH A TECHNOLOGY TRACKER NOT A VACCINE - WE HAVE DISCOVERED THE HEART STOPPING TRACKING RADAR THEY ARE GOING USE TO MURDER YOU - THE GLOBALIST CULT ARE IN A PANIC https://t.co/baSFuaLcp3

    10.0K4.3K213241927K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.1x their median

    Holy Shit. I mean Holy Fucking Shit: He is the director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, a professor of pediatrics at the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine, and a co-inventor of the rotavirus vaccine (RotaTeq). He has long publicly defended vaccines, argued against claims linking them to autism, and criticized figures like RFK Jr. on the topic. https://t.co/Q9JVuy3Xkp

    9.8K2.8K264111854K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.6x their median

    Did you know that Tyler Robinson has a VERY distinctive, noticeable, and identifiable scar/dimple on his face? There's a reason why the footage the state has shown you is of VERY low quality. More on this later. https://t.co/DuxMXLCb5k

    8.3K1.3K21540133K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.6x their median

    It's OK to admit that the photos on campus don't look like Tyler Robinson. You can't see the Mauser 98 on the roof. You can't see a shot fired. You can't see the rifle on his body. No it wouldn't fit in his skinny jeans. You don't need to be tribal about a murder trial. Just use your eyes and think. It doesn't make you crazy to ask questions about this. It's the most sane and rational approach you could take. It is shocking how many people have shut their brains off simply to distance themselves from Candace Owens. It doesn't make you look smart. It makes you look captured.

    8.3K99627749160K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6.2K interactions against 733K followers, an engagement rate of 0.845%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 321K times each, and 1.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 43.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 774K interactions, about 125x its own typical post.

What is Jimmy Dore's engagement rate on X?
Jimmy Dore (@jimmy_dore) has an engagement rate of 0.845%, based on the median interactions across 21 original posts from the last 30 days against 733,034 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.845%, Jimmy Dore sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jimmy_dore have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @jimmy_dore post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going