Back to @jonfavs's profile

Jon Favreau engagement report

@jonfavs - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.154%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
0.652%
316K views on a typical post
Reach
23.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
91 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
9.4/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.154%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 316K times each, and 0.652% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 9.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jon Favreau's engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.154%, Jon Favreau sits above the 50th percentile of the 218,065 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.149% to 0.705%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,065 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,725 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 267 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 29, 202619x their median

    Bedtime duties. https://t.co/43e18eofv7

    35K3.1K1.4K3442.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202613x their median

    Tucker Carlson recounts a private meeting where Donald Trump dismissed serious concerns over a potential war with Iran by casually telling him, "In the end, we're all dead anyway." "I said to him, shocked, 'But what about our kids, our grandkids, our country?' https://t.co/Hlum4a5UOk

    22K3.7K8446003.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 30, 202611x their median

    Q: How do you expect us to start families young when the average price of a home feels out of reach? JD VANCE: I want to point out that I've only gotten one question about Jon Husted's ass https://t.co/mFgYuuRQIN

    20K1.9K9679213.8M viewsView on X
  • Oct 29, 20269.7x their median

    OBAMA: The president wasn't even mad. About The Saddam Hussein comparison. That part didn't bother him. But he was very upset about The Cheesecake Factory. He took great umbrage. He said I didn't understand the work of the artisans in the White House. They mobilized a whole of government response to that joke. Not to inflation, but to that joke.

    17K2.5K2913292.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20269.7x their median

    NEW: I’m told by federal source that ICE has arrested roughly 300 Haitian nationals in the state of Ohio alone in recent days, as the agency is now considering transitioning into a find & arrest approach after giving Haitians several weeks to turn themselves in to ICE offices since TPS officially ended on July 27th. I’m told to expect arrests of Haitians to begin to significantly ramp up soon as ICE starts to prioritize tracking down those who never checked in.

    17K2.6K514134574K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20269.6x their median

    I wrote about the state of AI, why I’m concerned about the next few years, and the choices we need to make to keep the future in humanity’s hands. An Alien Mind: https://t.co/FeIfWNe0UE

    15K2.5K9631.1K7.7M viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 20267.7x their median

    Obama’s Oval Office looked like the lobby of a Motel 6. https://t.co/FCDwJsQOX2

    12K1.4K2.4K2881.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 20267.3x their median

    🥴 JD struggles through surprisingly contentious CBS town hall 🥴 Vance faced a number of tough questions from audience members and from Tony Dokoupil during exchanges like this: JD VANCE: The biggest reason why gas prices are so high is because when Joe Biden ... DOKOUPIL: It's almost been two years. At a certain point it becomes your economy, not Biden's economy Here's a supercut of Vance having a hard time explaining the sluggish economy, Trump's corruption, why the US hasn't already won the Iran war, and more:

    13K1.6K4641591.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20266.9x their median

    Just checking in on the guy a lot of people told us to take seriously as a non-partisan mayor of Los Angeles https://t.co/39HtwwzoSy

    12K9851.2K631.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.8x their median

    The mRNA vaccine success vs melanoma in a Phase definitive 3 randomized trial today is on top of signs of success for personalized mRNA neoantigen vaccines vs pancreatic cancer, triple negative breast cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer https://t.co/cv4iXW11mw

    11K2.2K4292641.5M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.154%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 316K times each, and 0.652% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 9.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

What is Jon Favreau's engagement rate on X?
Jon Favreau (@jonfavs) has an engagement rate of 0.154%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,336,531 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.154%, Jon Favreau sits above the 50th percentile of the 218,065 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jonfavs have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @jonfavs post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 9.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going