Back to @juancampanella's profile

Juan José Campanella engagement report

@juancampanella - 857K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.003%
of 857K followers
Per impression
0.403%
5.5K views on a typical post
Reach
0.64%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
22
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.07/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 857K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 0.403% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.637% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 51K interactions, about 43x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Juan José Campanella sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Oct 2, 202543x their median

    Este video me ha alegrado el dia https://t.co/9nyqrEiule

    44K5.6K261377664K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202542x their median

    “Quiero un Golden porque son súper tiernos…” Los Golden: https://t.co/Btu5wZwFFg

    45K4.2K7966842.4M viewsView on X
  • Dec 25, 202536x their median

    The FBI investigated Frank Capra's "It's a Wonderful Life" (1946) for potential communist propaganda because it portrayed bankers negatively This work of art aged like fine wine …and bankers have gotten far worse https://t.co/Enw9nIH2Yp

    37K6.0K244148534K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20261613x their median

    Lo que estábamos esperando, no lo vi y lo hice. La musica de Rocky con los goles de Enzo y Lautaro. Vamos Argentina Carajo!!! 1:13 para la piel de gallina https://t.co/7JYdcMHUqF

    30K4.8K458397920K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 2026550x their median

    Habrá habido equipos tan buenos como éste desde lo futbolístico, pero no desde lo humano. Nunca en el deporte las palabras "Coronados de gloria vivamos, o juremos con gloria morir" sonaron tan fuerte. Ganen o pierdan, atacan. Ojalá hoy tengan el triunfo. La gloria ya la lograron.

    10K1.6K7544118K viewsView on X
  • Dec 25, 2025539x their median

    https://t.co/pRiNuH2INc

    10K1.3K571451.0M viewsView on X
  • Nov 12, 20259.3x their median

    BUENOS AIRES FUE ELEGIDA LA CIUDAD MÁS DESEABLE DEL MUNDO Buenos Aires fue reconocida como la Ciudad Más Deseable del Mundo en los premios Wanderlust Reader Travel Awards 2025, superando a Tokio y Sídney. El ranking se elaboró con el voto de más de 208.000 lectores. El galardón fue entregado en Londres por la revista británica Wanderlust, considerada la revista de viajes más longeva y de mayor tirada del Reino Unido. Visit Buenos Aires destacó que el premio refleja la autenticidad, la cultura y la gastronomía porteña. Testimonios “Esta victoria supone un momento significativo para la capital argentina, célebre por su música, su cultura de cafés y su resurgente escena creativa”. Revista Wanderlust. “Este premio celebra la autenticidad de Buenos Aires: una ciudad vibrante, con una identidad cultural única, un patrimonio arquitectónico distintivo, gastronomía de primer nivel reconocida internacionalmente y la calidez característica de los porteños". Valentín Díaz Gilligan, presidente de Visit Buenos Aires. (+) en Clarín: https://t.co/5ZK1iy5U6H

    9.1K1.2K3344672.3M viewsView on X
  • Dec 24, 20257.4x their median

    James Stewart on why "It's a Wonderful Life" (1946) is his favourite movie. [Interview with Michael Parkinson, BBC, 1973] https://t.co/rgk0tlBbwI

    7.7K9805260305K viewsView on X
  • Dec 19, 20256.8x their median

    As the year comes to a close, TCM remembers the actors, filmmakers and creatives we lost this year. Gone, but never forgotten. Song title and artist: "In the Western Wind and the Sunrise" by Dave Simonett and the Sunrise. https://t.co/3muw4uMVv6

    5.7K1.8K214373684K viewsView on X
  • Apr 21, 2026305x their median

    Quiero compartir una carta que le escribí a Beto. https://t.co/HNzqvh8kFT

    5.4K1.0K23154137K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 857K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 0.403% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.637% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 51K interactions, about 43x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Juan José Campanella's engagement rate on X?
Juan José Campanella (@juancampanella) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 856,842 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Juan José Campanella sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @juancampanella have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @juancampanella post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going