Back to @juliancamarena's profile

Julian Camarena engagement report

@juliancamarena - 2.5M followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 2.5M followers
Per impression
0.481%
5.5K views on a typical post
Reach
0.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
26
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.13/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 2 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 0.481% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.223% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 613x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Julian Camarena's engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count. A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Julian Camarena sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Apr 18, 2026613x their median

    In my teens and 20's I would spend way too much time playing Starcraft and Civilization. Harvesting resources, building things, and expanding was super addictive to my brain - to an almost unhealthy degree. Later I realized that entrepreneurship and business is the ultimate game. It scratches the same itch for me (resources, building, expanding), but you're actually contributing to humanity at the end of the day, which can be much more fulfilling. Business is also much more positive sum than video games. In Starcraft, the other player has to lose for you to win. In business, there is competition, but in a growing market there can be multiple winners. And gains compound long term (it's a infinite game) instead of starting over each time. Now days I prefer to watch pros play video games to unwind, instead of playing video games myself. But a quick game can still be fun here and there to unwind. By contrast, the game of business is played over many decades.

    14K9917112461.4M viewsView on X
  • Feb 1, 202080x their median

    Now released, my Slow Dance Music Video! πŸŽ₯🎢 watch it here: https://t.co/JfdZ7LIgOT Can you guess what year the video takes place? https://t.co/HemysU1jk4

    1.0K51928127View on X
  • May 15, 2026

    Summer is here β˜€οΈ https://t.co/C5DfCafV5m

    263305.0K viewsView on X
  • May 25, 2026

    Late night swims πŸŠβ€β™‚οΈ are my new favorite thing, Bella agrees πŸ‘ŒπŸΌ https://t.co/qfbfAJF2cq

    1710407.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 2026

    Enjoying what’s left of summer β˜€οΈ https://t.co/WPe4Ril6A9

    291006.5K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 2026

    Been enjoying my time in Colombia πŸ‡¨πŸ‡΄ https://t.co/1Jmp0HkQpW

    2810113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 2026

    Join me in wishing this good boy a Happy 5th Birthday! 🐢 🎈 https://t.co/rvMhyJ869L

    201204.5K viewsView on X
  • Mar 27, 2026

    https://t.co/EUJ9qiHTWT

    182104.6K viewsView on X
  • May 24, 2026

    Smile, it’s finally summer β˜€οΈ https://t.co/Sbez3Imw7Z

    152025.2K viewsView on X
  • Jun 21, 2026

    Happy Father’s Day to my dad @camarenamart 🎨 https://t.co/vunZKZAJoJ

    124002.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 2 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 0.481% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.223% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 613x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Julian Camarena's engagement rate on X?
Julian Camarena (@juliancamarena) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,477,301 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Julian Camarena sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @juliancamarena have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count, which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @juliancamarena post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going