Back to @ki_young_ju's profile

Ki Young Ju engagement report

@ki_young_ju - 434K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.155%
of 434K followers
Per impression
1.08%
62K views on a typical post
Reach
14.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
673
interactions (median)
Saved
0.112%
70 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.03/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 673 interactions against 434K followers, an engagement rate of 0.155%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 3,848 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 62K times each, and 1.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 45% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ki Young Ju's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,848 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 53% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.155%, Ki Young Ju sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.436%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.436%
p902.10%
p99160.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,214 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,785 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.436%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 20264.5x their median

    The Bitcoin bear cycle is over. https://t.co/bAl8T2UDgn

    2.5K317160100286K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.8x their median

    Hedge funds on CME flipped net long BTC futures. This is rare. The basis trade keeps them structurally short. That's why this chart's been red for years. You can't carry trade into a net long. The suits are betting on upside. https://t.co/hG1musewVx

    1.5K2128253213K viewsView on X
  • Jan 25, 20232.5x their median

    #Bitcoin entered into the early bull phase. https://t.co/9bQo2gfJg4 https://t.co/2ZGsPups90

    1.3K3026627528K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.2x their median

    BTC looking strong here. Rallies like this in bear markets usually signal the bottom is in. Might see a dip, but the bear phase is pretty much done imo.

    1.3K9066973K viewsView on X
  • Apr 27, 2026

    Bitcoin is currently futures-driven. Open interest is rising, but on-chain apparent demand remains net negative despite ETF inflows and Saylor buys. Historically, bear markets end when both spot and futures demand recover. https://t.co/HcCjBQTniL

    7661216631122K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 2026

    Bitcoin likely has another parabolic cycle ahead. Yes, capital efficiency is declining. In 2011, just $2.7B in net capital inflows drove a 55,436% price increase. This cycle, $697B produced a +689% return. The next parabolic bull cycle likely requires deeper institutional allocation. Bitcoin needs to be a core macro asset, not just a retail-driven ETF trade. That shift is still early, not invalidated. If Bitcoin can absorb $1T+ in realized cap, another parabolic bull run remains on the table. Gold's market cap is currently $27T.

    7991034925127K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    For the first time since the October 2025 ATH, Bitcoin demand has turned positive in both spot and perpetual futures. The scale remains modest, but if this holds for another month, it would be reasonable to conclude that the bear market is over and a new bull cycle has begun. https://t.co/e8TAqeLySd

    8219333752K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 2026

    Some bullish Bitcoin opium is coming in the next few months to relieve your bear market pain. Just not yet. Hang in there.

    81149551093K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    BTC: Coinbase Premium turned positive, indicating bullish U.S. institutional sentiment. https://t.co/TG8QXqXQv3

    760105431162K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 2026

    Now sell the Bitcoin and buy your kidney back. https://t.co/euJNWDDs3K

    6704441671K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 673 interactions against 434K followers, an engagement rate of 0.155%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 3,848 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 62K times each, and 1.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 45% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post.

What is Ki Young Ju's engagement rate on X?
Ki Young Ju (@ki_young_ju) has an engagement rate of 0.155%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 434,312 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.155%, Ki Young Ju sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ki_young_ju have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,848 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ki_young_ju post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going