Black Hole engagement report
@konstructivizm - 874K followers on X
Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 128 interactions against 874K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 1.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 614 interactions, about 4.8x its own typical post.
Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Black Hole's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.015%, Black Hole sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.433% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 98K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 231K |
| Monday | 0% | 288K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 278K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 253K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Aug 29, 20264.8x their median
The Whirlpool Galaxy (M51) captured with an amateur telescope https://t.co/p0MGXRZv7Y
- Aug 29, 20264.1x their median
A stunning visualization of a black hole and how its gravity distorts light passing nearby 🔭 https://t.co/y9b385KH3v
- Aug 21, 20263.8x their median
A cosmic giant and its tiny neighbor 🌋 Mars is home to Olympus Mons—the largest volcano in the Solar System—which reaches an impressive height of 26 kilometers and covers an area comparable to that of France. For scale, the tiny Martian moon Phobos—potato-shaped and diminutive—regularly drifts past this titanic slope.
- Aug 22, 20263.4x their median
Earth isn’t a cosmic lottery ticket — new models show our world was practically inevitable For decades, planetary scientists treated Earth’s existence like a rare jackpot: the right size, the right distance from the Sun, the right conditions for life — all somehow lining up by pure chance. New simulations presented at the Origins 2026 conference in Paris are rewriting that story. Planetary scientist Nader Haghighipour of the University of Hawaii and his team ran more than 1,000 high-fidelity simulations of the late stages of terrestrial planet formation. Unlike earlier models that started with carefully chosen “solar-system-like” setups, these runs began from completely random distributions of planetesimals and planetary embryos. No assumptions. Just physics. The result? A planet the size of Earth forming at roughly 1 astronomical unit (Earth’s actual distance from the Sun) emerges as a natural, recurring outcome. Venus appears about 28% of the time and often stays in or near the habitable zone. Mars shows up repeatedly as a smaller body near its real orbit. In short, our familiar planetary lineup isn’t a fluke — it’s what the laws of physics tend to produce in a protoplanetary disk with a realistic, non-uniform distribution of solid material. Haghighipour puts it bluntly: “There is no reason to believe that our Earth is a fluke.” Tiny differences in the starting conditions can still send systems down wildly different paths, but the pathway that leads to an Earth-like world is surprisingly robust. The same simulations also hint that Earth-sized (and slightly larger) planets in the habitable zones of Sun-like stars should be common across the galaxy. Detecting life on those worlds remains far beyond our current technology. Yet understanding exactly how Earth became habitable — without any special pleading — gives us a much clearer target. Life may not be rare. The conditions that allow it to arise may simply be what nature does when you let the physics run free.
- Aug 28, 20263.3x their median
Breathtaking footage of the ISS in flight, captured by the approaching Soyuz spacecraft https://t.co/GIg5xb0mnv
- Aug 28, 20263.1x their median
It is amazing how well Jupiter protects the inner part of the Solar System. https://t.co/tCP49qtGEH
- Aug 22, 20263.1x their median
The Elephant's Trunk in Cepheus Image Credit : Eddie Sgarbossa https://t.co/P8pD1yFYWv
- Aug 29, 20262.4x their median
"Universe, give us a sign!" In 2023, the James Webb Telescope captured a distant galactic system that, thanks to gravitational lensing, resembles a giant question mark. In reality, it is not a single galaxy shaped this way; the massive cluster MACS J0417.5−1154 warps spacetime, creating multiple images of distant galaxies. What makes this particularly unusual is that the configuration results from a very rare type of gravitational lensing known as a hyperbolic umbilic lens. The object itself has even been dubbed the "Question Mark Galaxy" in MACS J0417.5−1154
- Aug 29, 20262.4x their median
A Venusian landscape captured by the Soviet probe *Venera-14*, which managed not only to land on the surface of the Solar System's hottest planet but also to operate there for 57 minutes. https://t.co/1WBacOyn57
- Aug 29, 20262.4x their median
??? The Maya Knew About Saturn’s Rings Before Galileo Maya artifacts depicting extraterrestrial "teachers" and flying craft no longer come as a surprise. But this is something different: a depiction of planetary rings. Galileo discovered Saturn’s rings in 1610. The Maya beat him to it.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 128 interactions against 874K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 1.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 614 interactions, about 4.8x its own typical post.
- What is Black Hole's engagement rate on X?
- Black Hole (@konstructivizm) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 80 original posts from the last 30 days against 873,760 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.015%, Black Hole sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @konstructivizm have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @konstructivizm post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.