Back to @larryelder's profile

Larry Elder engagement report

@larryelder - 1.8M followers on X

Measured over 95 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.029%
of 1.8M followers
Per impression
1.38%
38K views on a typical post
Reach
2.08%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
524
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.77/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 524 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 95 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 95 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 62x its own typical post.

Measured over 95 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tag: #throwbackthursday.

Compared with accounts its own size

Larry Elder's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.029%, Larry Elder sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.432%
p902.10%
p99161.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,378 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.432%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile161.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 202662x their median

    Piker: "It’s laughable to say guys like myself, guys like Abdul El-Sayed, we hate America." Also Piker: "I hate America." https://t.co/AuK8FV1leX

    26K5.6K5993903.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202649x their median

    🚨 https://t.co/DX6ohgJJ8y

    21K3.4K8644582.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202624x their median

    “The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." —Margaret Thatcher https://t.co/CCT8etbdrr

    11K1.5K952760K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202618x their median

    https://t.co/2PJFWrj4zy

    7.9K1.2K12540151K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202617x their median

    🔥 STEPHEN A. SMITH IS STARTING TO SEE WHAT BLACK CONSERVATIVES HAVE BEEN SAYING FOR YEARS. Stephen A. Smith is pushing back hard against the National Association of Black Journalists after receiving a “Thumbs Down” award for allegedly disparaging Black women. He called the accusation a “flat-out lie” and argued that disagreeing with Black women such as Jasmine Crockett, Kamala Harris, or Michelle Obama does not mean he is attacking Black women. And this raises a bigger question: Why are Black people sometimes expected to have 100% political allegiance to the Democratic Party to be considered “Black enough”? You should be able to disagree with a politician—regardless of their race or gender—without being accused of betraying your community. Being Black does not require voting Democrat. Being Black does not require agreeing with every Democratic talking point. And disagreeing with another Black person does not make you anti-Black. Black conservatives have been saying this for years. Maybe now more people are finally listening. 🇺🇸🔥 #StephenASmith #BlackConservatives #BlackConservative #PoliticalFreedom #FreeSpeech #ConservativeVoices #BlackVoices #Republican #Conservative #PoliticalIndependence #NABJ #Democrats #Politics #America #ViralPolitics #SpeakYourMind

    7.6K1.1K23141548K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202614x their median

    https://t.co/zgd5XKG83g

    6.5K6842321155K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202613x their median

    https://t.co/I2DVxr2vOC

    6.5K433539251K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202612x their median

    https://t.co/s55Ag7FFzi

    5.4K58050951K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202611x their median

    https://t.co/WghWmD8r8r

    4.9K961622863K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202611x their median

    “Yeah, kill them! Kill those mother—-s and murder those mother—-s in the streets. Let the streets soak in their f—g red capitalist blood, dude.” —Hasan Piker https://t.co/MfYuuTLXBK

    4.4K1.1K641647K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#throwbackthursday

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 524 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 95 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 95 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 62x its own typical post.

What is Larry Elder's engagement rate on X?
Larry Elder (@larryelder) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 95 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,834,065 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.029%, Larry Elder sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @larryelder have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @larryelder post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going