Back to @laurenboebert's profile

Lauren Boebert engagement report

@laurenboebert - 5.2M followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.006%
of 5.2M followers
Per impression
0.251%
133K views on a typical post
Reach
2.57%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
334
interactions (median)
Saved
0.004%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.63/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 334 interactions against 5.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 133K times each, and 0.251% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 108K interactions, about 323x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tag: #thebigtake.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lauren Boebert's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, Lauren Boebert sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 1, 2026323x their median

    New York: it's hot out there, and the power grid is working overtime to keep us cool. Set your AC to 78 degrees, turn off lights/electronics you're not using, and unplug what you can. Our City is doing its part too: maintaining the 78 degrees rule in our buildings, dimming/turning off our lights during peak electricity demand, asking private partners to do the same, and powering down non-essential equipment. A stable grid means the AC stays on, and lives are saved. Let's ease demand — and get through the heat — together.

    69K3.4K27K7.7K60M viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 2026192x their median

    Justice has not been served until Anthony Fauci is in prison.

    55K4.7K4.1K257680K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 2026179x their median

    A mother in Oregon is told she can no longer have access to her child patient portal “I just got done taking my son to the doctor and they tried telling me at the front desk that I don't have access to his patient portal anymore because he just turned 13. Are you kidding me? He is under the age of 18. He is my child. I should have access to what his medical stuff is. That is insane to me” This is real and because Democrats are trying to twine away parents rights from their own kids Here’s what happens at age 13 in Oregon Oregon Minor Consent Laws kick in, minors gain rights to confidential care in certain areas without parental knowledge or consent - Age 14+: Can consent to outpatient mental health, drug and alcohol treatment - Age 15+: Can consent to general medical, hospital, dental and surgical care - Any age: Full confidentiality for reproductive health birth control, STI, HIV testing and treatment Systems like MyChart and Epic often default to restricting or segmenting parental (“proxy”) access starting at age 13 Who needs enemies when you have Democrats. They are literally restricting you from knowing what your own kid is doing medically

    38K16K4.1K1.3K1.5M viewsView on X
  • Mar 18, 2024129x their median

    I need your help getting this ad in front of every voter in Colorado’s Fourth District. President Trump has entrusted me with his Complete & Total Endorsement - and you know that I’ll be working with him every step of the way to Save America! Donate here and let’s get this in front of every voter: https://t.co/Fja3lXlS8M

    20K7.0K15K6314.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 2026120x their median

    “I’m unable to solve” https://t.co/wJFKk1G7k7

    35K4.7K764157304K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 202684x their median

    🚨 JUST IN: The Colorado Supreme Court has unanimously BLOCKED Democrat redistricting efforts in Colorado, which would’ve given them THREE MORE SEATS in the US House The delegation will remain 4R-4D THREE ballot measures were struck down by the court HUGE win for Republicans The court held that the redistricting proposals violated Colorado’s constitutional single-subject requirement h/t @scotus_wire

    24K3.8K14365570K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 202682x their median

    Some GOP leaders have turned a blind eye to Radical Islamic takeovers happening in their state. It’s time for Christians to speak up! @RobSchneider @OANN https://t.co/Lz5uEPX6lZ

    21K5.5K55478210K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 202674x their median

    The CIA lied to us about MK ULTRA. what are they lying to us about now? https://t.co/9GsRHuLoLs

    20K4.1K980181352K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 202658x their median

    DADGUM GIVEAWAY: I'm giving away a SIGNED original Burchett Board for my birthday. One winner, chosen 8/25. Enter to win here:

    16K2.4K727681.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202646x their median

    If you’re wondering why gun laws don’t stand up anymore this cartoon I shamelessly stole from someone long ago helps catch you up on some of the government’s buffoonery on behalf of liberals https://t.co/BceIZHQXuX

    13K1.9K158140520K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#thebigtake

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 334 interactions against 5.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 133K times each, and 0.251% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 108K interactions, about 323x its own typical post.

What is Lauren Boebert's engagement rate on X?
Lauren Boebert (@laurenboebert) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 5,180,400 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, Lauren Boebert sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @laurenboebert have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @laurenboebert post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going