Back to @leandroruschel's profile

Leandro Ruschel 🇧🇷🇺🇸🇮🇹🇩🇪 engagement report

@leandroruschel - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 90 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.38%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
11.4%
37K views on a typical post
Reach
3.32%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.102%
38 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.47/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 4.3K interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.38%. Measured over 90 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 11.4% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 90 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 90 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Leandro Ruschel 🇧🇷🇺🇸🇮🇹🇩🇪's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.38%, Leandro Ruschel 🇧🇷🇺🇸🇮🇹🇩🇪 sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 12, 20265.0x their median

    SENSAÇÃO 🤣 https://t.co/vgh6QmwZWu

    18K2.2K1.1K205185K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.7x their median

    Espero que o candidato Renan Santos restabeleça sua candidatura. O Presidente @jairbolsonaro está com suas redes sociais bloqueadas há mais de um ano e a censura não pode mais ser banalizada no Brasil! https://t.co/7yTme3GNTB

    16K3.2K661278269K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.6x their median

    A comparsa do Lulinha, que agora nenhum "cumpanheiro" conhece, apagou seus perfis. Mas a internet nunca esquece. https://t.co/7YI8SvxSbV

    15K4.8K17711083K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20264.0x their median

    Ué, mas não foi a Verba Magalhães que postou o meme "Vigiar e Punir, Gostosa Demais" em homenagem a Moraes? O que aconteceu, a censura e a perseguição não estão mais "gostosas"? https://t.co/nfzGkPsvnk

    14K2.9K1574577K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.9x their median

    Já é um escândalo de gigantescas proporções: ministros do Supremo operando como políticos, promovendo na casa de Moraes um acordo entre o Descondenado e o presidente do Congresso. Mas, segundo Lauro Jardim, o escândalo é ainda maior. Naquele jantar, ministros e políticos (será que ainda há alguma diferença?) teriam montado uma estratégia para enfraquecer André Mendonça, ministro não alinhado da corte e relator de inquéritos que contrariam os interesses do grupo ali reunido. E há quem ainda chame essa promiscuidade institucional de "democracia".

    13K3.6K198106112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.3x their median

    Ser lixeiro não é demérito para ninguém. O que é vergonhoso mesmo é ser ladrão.

    12K1.5K1351764K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.1x their median

    GRAVÍSSIMO! O @caiojunqueiraf afirma com todas as letras que ministros pressionaram o Centrão a não apoiar Flávio, sob a ameaça de investigações policiais. https://t.co/GSn4PrqW2q

    9.7K3.2K1548069K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.6x their median

    Começou oficialmente a campanha eleitoral... ou seja, aumentará a censura. https://t.co/iRlvIh3OMq

    9.1K2.0K894068K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.4x their median

    Irrefutável. https://t.co/KW5mkwZBiN

    8.9K1.5K191036K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.4x their median

    Mais um relato de uso do Judiciário para pressionar caciques partidários. https://t.co/5EOvK4mkaA

    8.4K1.9K933878K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.3K interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.38%. Measured over 90 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 11.4% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 90 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.

What is Leandro Ruschel 🇧🇷🇺🇸🇮🇹🇩🇪's engagement rate on X?
Leandro Ruschel 🇧🇷🇺🇸🇮🇹🇩🇪 (@leandroruschel) has an engagement rate of 0.38%, based on the median interactions across 90 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,124,611 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.38%, Leandro Ruschel 🇧🇷🇺🇸🇮🇹🇩🇪 sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @leandroruschel have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @leandroruschel post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going