Back to @leozuckermann's profile

Leo Zuckermann engagement report

@leozuckermann - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.01%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
0.973%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
1.00%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
134
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 134 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.973% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video and 79% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 114x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #eslahoradeopinar, #tercergrado, #podcast.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #eslahoradeopinar, #tercergrado, #podcast.

Compared with accounts its own size

Leo Zuckermann's engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, Leo Zuckermann sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 2026114x their median

    Ay, abuelo querido, me pregunto qué opinarías al ver que en este generoso México, que te recibió dos veces en tu obligado exilio por estar en las listas de los nazis y estalinistas, ahora su gobierno elabora listas de sus críticos donde aparece de nuevo tu nombre, que es el mío.

    11K2.9K1.3K193316K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 202670x their median

    Sí, acabaron siendo un peligro para México. Nuestro país está peor que en 2018 cuando Morena llegó al poder. Hoy tenemos un mayor control territorial del crimen organizado, finanzas públicas prendidas con alfileres y una democracia desmantelada https://t.co/EyGYAE3fHz

    5.3K2.5K1.5K187307K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202612x their median

    Nosotros sólo reaccionamos a lo que hacen los políticos quienes estas dos últimas semanas nos han ofrecido un espectáculo de soberbia, arrogancia, ridículo, incompetencia y descoordinación que genera la sensación de desgobierno https://t.co/xPUc6GDrJP

    1.1K39854819K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202611x their median

    Andy es el epítome del embuste. Se lee clarito en la carta que le envió a Trump. Exhibe la soberbia y arrogancia del mirrey. Porque él se apellida López, sí de los López moralmente superiores que prometieron purificar la vida pública del país.  https://t.co/30P5MMpLKq

    1.1K35956719K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20269.6x their median

    No necesitamos al Estado para que nos proteja en el ámbito informativo. Al revés, es un peligro para la libertad de expresión que cinco burócratas cercanos al gobierno tengan el poder de decidir qué es veraz y, en consecuencia, multar a un medio. https://t.co/LSvtJe8Uof

    8213331121736K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20268.0x their median

    La lista evidencia la paranoia de un gobierno frustrado por estar perdiendo la narrativa. No quieren hacerse responsables de una realidad adversa apabullante. No es que sean incompetentes y corruptos, sino víctimas de un gran complot en su contra. https://t.co/X4ifCRQETW

    74224878519K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20267.3x their median

    “Nosotros no somos iguales”, repetía el entonces presidente López Obrador hasta el cansancio. A Sheinbaum ya no la escuchamos decir lo mismo. La 4T ahora lo ha sustituido por “ellos hacían lo mismo”. https://t.co/3fLqMIbiFu

    64729534413K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20266.1x their median

    A dos décadas de la campaña de “López Obrador es un peligro para México”, más allá de reconocer que esta expresión fue de propaganda en su contra, creo que vale la pena reflexionar si efectivamente lo fue. https://t.co/EyGYAE3Nx7

    4771761352323K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20265.5x their median

    “Lo que pienso y de verdad ya lo dudo seriamente es de la capacidad intelectual de la gobernadora de Baja California, por decirlo suavecito, porque también es la segunda vez que la graban”: @leozuckermann en #TercerGrado | Mira el análisis en https://t.co/IPE4ELRZ25 y escúchalo en todas las plataformas de audio. #Podcast

    58013022432K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20264.1x their median

    Sí, acabaron siendo un peligro para México https://t.co/EyGYAE3fHz

    3631453957.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#eslahoradeopinar#tercergrado#podcast#loret

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 134 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.973% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.00% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video and 79% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 114x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #eslahoradeopinar, #tercergrado, #podcast.

What is Leo Zuckermann's engagement rate on X?
Leo Zuckermann (@leozuckermann) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,367,414 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, Leo Zuckermann sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @leozuckermann have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @leozuckermann post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going