Back to @lilachbullock's profile

Lilach Bullock engagement report

@lilachbullock - 93K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
16.9%
of 93K followers
Per impression
0.262%
6.0M views on a typical post
Reach
6463.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
16K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.036%
2.2K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.9/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 16K interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 16.9%. Posts are seen about 6.0M times each, and 0.262% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6463.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 2.4x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tag: #shalom.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 16.9%, Lilach Bullock sits above the 90th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.10% to 159.8%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.438%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,459 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,523 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.438%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-3%100K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-4%101K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-1%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%236K
Monday0%298K
Tuesday-3%295K
Wednesday-1%255K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%257K
Saturday+3%231K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • May 23, 20262.4x their median

    We demand an explanation from the Spanish government regarding its treatment of the flotilla anarchists https://t.co/k2bbkKq7tm

    28K5.4K2.4K1.3K2.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20261.7x their median

    The face of pure hatred. An Irish citizen visiting France, tells two Jewish visitors he's sorry Hitler didn't finish the job. They started videoing him and he threatens to kill them. Identified himself as "Paddy from Ireland". https://t.co/lzDFY7chtA

    18K3.4K4.2K1.1K11M viewsView on X
  • May 22, 2026

    A genocide is happening in Gaza, they tell us. Then scroll your feed: Comma Cafee, just opened in Gaza City. Espresso machines, plated desserts, dim lighting. Vanilla Café. Upscale, glass facade. Nova Restaurant in Khan Younis: sleek wood interior, beachfront seating. Named, apparently without irony, after the music festival where 364 Israelis were slaughtered on October 7. O2 Restaurant. pizza, ice cream, milkshakes, TikTok food porn. Open-air markets in Gaza City with apples, avocados, oranges, bananas. Supermarkets stocked for Ramadan with imported goods. A "Gaza Coffee" brand selling 100% Arabica premium beans, taking online orders, with five-star reviews dated this year. Even Al Jazeera's writer concedes the cafes "were built with expensive materials, carefully painted, furnished with tables, sofas, and elegant chairs, with glass facades and shining lights." Now hold that next to actual genocide. Rwanda, 1994. 800,000 Tutsi murdered in 100 days. ~8,000 per day. Hutu radio read names of neighbors to be hacked apart by morning. No one opened a café. Cambodia, 1975–79. Khmer Rouge emptied Phnom Penh at gunpoint in 72 hours. Currency abolished. Markets abolished. Eyeglasses got you killed. Two million dead. The Holocaust. Warsaw Ghetto: 92,000 dead of starvation and disease before the deportations even began. Auschwitz processed 6,000 people a day into smoke. There were no glass-facade espresso bars in Łódź in 1943. Srebrenica, July 1995. 8,372 men and boys executed in days. No restaurants reopened. They were in mass graves. Armenia, 1915. Death marches into the Syrian desert. No imported avocados. The common thread of genocide is that the targeted population is not allowed to exist. Not in cafes, not in markets, not in their homes, not anywhere. The perpetrator's entire project is their absence. Gaza in 2026, by every honest description, is something else: a brutal war zone, partially destroyed, with a population suffering real hardship and simultaneously a place where new businesses open, beachfront restaurants serve customers, and a post war economy is being written about in business pages. Both things are true. That is what war looks like. Lebanon 2006. Mosul 2017. Mariupol 2022. Aleppo 2016. Civilians die and life adapts around the destruction. It is not what genocide looks like. So why the word? Because "genocide" is the most powerful word in the post-WWII moral vocabulary. It triggers automatic legal obligations, suspends normal debate, and short-circuits proportionality analysis. Apply it successfully and your adversary loses the right to defend itself before the argument even begins. That is exactly why it is being deployed by a side that started a war on October 7, took hostages, embedded itself in hospitals and schools, and now needs the West to force a ceasefire it could not win on the battlefield. It is asymmetric warfare with a thesaurus. The rockets failed. The tunnels failed. The word might not. Coffee in Gaza doesn't prove there is no suffering. It proves there is no genocide. Those are not the same claim and the people conflating them are counting on you not to notice.

    4.5K1.2K196114961K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 2026

    🚨FIRE BOMB OF ✡️ KOSHER RESTAURANT IN MONTREAL 🇨🇦🚨 I’m visiting Montreal now. Kosher Noam restaurant burned to the ground last night. Canadian Jews under regular attack by the mass jihadists welcomed by @MarkJCarney liberals. Disgusting. Shameful. 🇨🇦🥷🕌☪️ https://t.co/mkVQiCdTQ0

    3.5K8203071111.0M viewsView on X
  • Jan 22, 2026

    I’m relaunching my newsletter. Yes, again. This time with intent. ​ It’s weekly. It’s practical. And it’s not here to make you feel bad about all the tools you’re not using. ​ The first edition is a list I actually want myself. ​ Only free tools. AI, productivity, business. Stuff that does something useful without immediately waving a credit card at you. ​ No trials pretending to be free. No free until you need the one feature that matters. No congratulations, you’ve unlocked nothing. ​ I’m not even convinced there are that many left, which feels like a good enough reason to look properly. ​ If you use a tool that is actually free and actually helpful, drop it below. I’ll include the best ones in the first newsletter. ​ Full list goes to subscribers. Link’s in the comments.

    164411.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#shalom

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 16K interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 16.9%. Posts are seen about 6.0M times each, and 0.262% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6463.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 2.4x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Lilach Bullock's engagement rate on X?
Lilach Bullock (@lilachbullock) has an engagement rate of 16.9%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 93,486 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 16.9%, Lilach Bullock sits above the 90th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lilachbullock have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @lilachbullock post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going