Back to @limewire's profile

LimeWire engagement report

@limewire - 220K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.082%
of 220K followers
Per impression
1.09%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
7.55%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
185
interactions (median)
Saved
0.059%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 185 interactions against 220K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video and 5% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 6.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

LimeWire's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.082%, LimeWire sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,698 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video84% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 84% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 174 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 20266.4x their median

    satoshi, care to explain what this was doing on limewire in 2007? https://t.co/eOAj7V5AgQ

    9671089620309K viewsView on X
  • Jan 26, 20266.0x their median

    ๐Ÿš€ Creator Competition is now live! LimeWire x @TheCreatorFi invite creators & community members to compete for a 125,000 $LMWR prize pool. Join via CreatorFi, connect your X account & share your thoughts on LimeWire. ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/SL1bHKMyCi https://t.co/UGtM8rksV8

    40547742529K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20262.9x their median

    so... do I get a pay raise or what? https://t.co/JQ3DuHcVwh

    4642445215K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.9x their median

    We have a new core team @BabyDoge, new opportunities, and weโ€™re ready to disrupt the internet all over again. The system got upgraded. The rebellion didnโ€™t. https://t.co/D9T101171q

    380100417167K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.7x their median

    I just learned something insane and unsettling about @googledrive. Since @google offers no solution, I'm sharing with the X hive mind in hopes of finding a solution. A random email address in Nigeria shared with me a document via my Google Drive. It popped up as a phone notification, and since I work with video editors and routinely get sent videos that way, I clicked on the notification as soon as I saw the icon, without expanding the notification or seeing the filename. I was a directory full of nude photographs. I clicked on "report," but the only report it let me file from the Drive screen on my phone was an "NCII," which is a claim that the nudes are of me. They weren't. I went to Gemini and explained what happened and asked how I can prevent it in the future. This was its answer: "Since anyone with your email address can share a file with you on Google Drive, there isn't a global setting to block all unknown users. Blocking the specific spammer and reporting the file is the best way to handle this." So to recap, anyone can send you any creepy or pornographic content via your Google Drive that literally pops up as a notification on your phone - and there's nothing you can do to prevent it. How is this possible, @google? Anyone have any advice on how I block this kind of attack? Or make sure my kids' phones aren't susceptible to something like this?

    4143551471K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20261.8x their median

    DO NOT TEXT ME RN IM FOCUSING https://t.co/XqEJfcO6bh

    307187174K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20261.6x their median

    https://t.co/y3rlAkJKKF

    2362624618K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    if you write about 2000s viruses one more time, Iโ€™ll be waiting for you in the gym https://t.co/0PcuvxzyE0

    2311610240K viewsView on X
  • Jan 29, 20262.8x their median

    500+ creators have already joined ๐Ÿ‘€ Our LimeWire x @TheCreatorFi creator campaign is in full swing, with 25 days still to go. Jump in, share your thoughts on LimeWire & compete for 125,000 $LMWR ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/SL1bHKMyCi

    1843234511K viewsView on X
  • Apr 10, 20262.7x their median

    The LimeWire Network is now LIVE in Public Beta ๐Ÿš€ A decentralized object storage built for enterprise use - fully S3 compatible and easy to migrate from traditional providers like AWS or Google Cloud. Powered as a trustless system built on @BNBCHAIN, LimeWire Network is already handling ~20M uploads every month. Web3 companies & enterprises can now tap into low-latency, cost-efficient storage at scale. Welcome to the next generation of storage ๐Ÿ”—

    15019235978K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 185 interactions against 220K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video and 5% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 6.4x its own typical post.

What is LimeWire's engagement rate on X?
LimeWire (@limewire) has an engagement rate of 0.082%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 220,482 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.082%, LimeWire sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @limewire have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @limewire post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going