Back to @lindzeex's profile

π–«π—‚π—‡π–½π—“π–Ύπ–ΎπŸ€ engagement report

@lindzeex - 393K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.432%
of 393K followers
Per impression
5.27%
32K views on a typical post
Reach
8.20%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.158%
51 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 393K followers, an engagement rate of 0.432%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,810 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 5.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 42K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

π–«π—‚π—‡π–½π—“π–Ύπ–ΎπŸ€'s engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,810 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.432%, π–«π—‚π—‡π–½π—“π–Ύπ–ΎπŸ€ sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.435%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Apr 1, 202325x their median

    Bedroom eyes 😈 https://t.co/AxdaNWeB8U

    39K1.4K1.6K3512M viewsView on X
  • Jun 21, 20263.5x their median

    https://t.co/M4tWNObGa4

    5.8K801281206K viewsView on X
  • Jun 20, 20263.3x their median

    Uh yeah no caption needed… πŸ₯΅ https://t.co/TsAeT4RxVG

    5.4K851581108K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 20262.8x their median

    I need some sun or someone’s son to keep me warm πŸ’™ https://t.co/WCJkvrbVFL

    4.6K57165199K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20262.3x their median

    When they say to shave it all off…no thanks 😊 https://t.co/IXZLaeej3V

    3.8K6368185K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.1x their median

    Oh what a view!!! 🫦 https://t.co/Mg14EChKEm

    3.4K38133031K viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 20262.1x their median

    https://t.co/xNBFKyGuNq

    3.5K3576086K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 20262.1x their median

    Do you like this on me?! πŸ˜‰ https://t.co/RFwcRIo0T0

    3.3K42188073K viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 20261.8x their median

    These eyes can see your soul.. https://t.co/BRlWZxLd57

    3.0K3198070K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20261.8x their median

    Pink for the win🩷 https://t.co/o6sJNQxfAv

    2.9K3895067K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 393K followers, an engagement rate of 0.432%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 3,810 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 5.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 42K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

What is π–«π—‚π—‡π–½π—“π–Ύπ–ΎπŸ€'s engagement rate on X?
π–«π—‚π—‡π–½π—“π–Ύπ–ΎπŸ€ (@lindzeex) has an engagement rate of 0.432%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 393,228 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.432%, π–«π—‚π—‡π–½π—“π–Ύπ–ΎπŸ€ sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lindzeex have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,810 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lindzeex post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going