Back to @londie_london's profile

Londie London engagement report

@londie_london - 419K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 419K followers
Per impression
0.171%
3.8K views on a typical post
Reach
0.91%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 419K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 3,810 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 0.171% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.907% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions, about 928x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #madiaka, #fakemarriages, #012love.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #madiaka, #fakemarriages, #012love.

Compared with accounts its own size

Londie London's engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,810 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Londie London sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 29, 2026928x their median

    Before ARVs vs After ARVs https://t.co/uHKcBxRYYg

    4.7K433291103916K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202683x their median

    πŸ₯Ίβœ¨ https://t.co/jyvOfxG57J

    480114219K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202616x their median

    KIA South Africa should take notes ‼️ https://t.co/HdeYsjceEb

    902103.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.8x their median

    They both benefited here πŸ‘€#FakeMarriages

    64104.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.8x their median

    Tsekeleke is built weird 😭😭😭#012Love https://t.co/gugwqBAaus

    91104.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.7x their median

    This is so disturbing πŸ’”πŸ’”πŸ’” #FakeMarriages

    55005.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20261.5x their median

    POV: it’s 2016😭 IYKYK https://t.co/DsQusSNFAW

    90003.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    Every episode I’m reminded that children are often caught in wars they didn’t start. πŸ’” #MadiAka

    24111.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    Yoh Rachel atle a ba le drama #MadiAka

    4201632 viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    Something is not making sense here #MadiAka

    23023.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#madiaka#fakemarriages#012love#nigeria

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 419K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 3,810 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 0.171% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.907% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions, about 928x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #madiaka, #fakemarriages, #012love.

What is Londie London's engagement rate on X?
Londie London (@londie_london) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 418,723 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Londie London sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @londie_london have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,810 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @londie_london post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going