Back to @lopp's profile

Jameson Lopp engagement report

@lopp - 531K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.04%
of 531K followers
Per impression
1.17%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
3.43%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
213
interactions (median)
Saved
0.055%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 213 interactions against 531K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 1.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 29% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 10x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jameson Lopp's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.04%, Jameson Lopp sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,137 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%51K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%71K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%93K
14:00 UTC-3%96K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%229K
Monday0%284K
Tuesday-2%273K
Wednesday-1%250K
Thursday-2%243K
Friday-3%251K
Saturday+3%226K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 202310x their median

    If you install Google Authenticator from the app store and follow the suggested instructions, your 2FA codes are by default saved to the cloud. I recommend not linking the Authenticator to your Google account, in which case you should see this "no cloud" icon in the upper right. https://t.co/fTB64aRHMr

    1.6K29017845811K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20266.3x their median

    I won't be "welcoming back" or unblocking any BIP-110 supporters. They proved themselves to be susceptible to delusional propaganda from folks emanating reality distortion fields. In many cases they spewed vitriol and harassed the very people who have devoted their lives to supporting and improving Bitcoin. I expect that Bitcoin Puritan culture will continue on its path to becoming even more unhinged, and its adherents have already wasted countless hours of our time. No more.

    1.1K831032057K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.1x their median

    "Don't get so busy making a living that you forget to make a life." - Dolly Parton Rest in Peace

    818469019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20264.1x their median

    An inevitable development: people who buy houses formerly owned by wealthy bitcoiners are in physical danger. One couple in France who have no crypto were wrench attacked 3 times in one month because their address is in data breaches. https://t.co/on7P87lmSA

    6861004537182K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20262.4x their median

    BIP-110 now has its own chain fork! https://t.co/F7WQf1Yyki

    43135301040K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.4x their median

    The folks who get upset when they run out of tokens on their AI subscription are going to have a bad time when the VC subsidies dry up and prices rise to market rates. Y'all had better be figuring out how to run open weight models locally.

    3974458425K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20261.9x their median

    Were you foolish enough to run a BIP-110 node despite my warnings that it would break? Now your node is stuck at height 961,633 and simply switching to a different client won't fix it. To get back on the real Bitcoin chain: $ bitcoin-cli invalidateblock 0000000000000000000169eb6f811ddbd0daf343af7b62180cdb13e7c78dbc16 $ bitcoin-cli stop [install a non BIP-110 client] $ bitcoind -reindex -daemon

    3592923426K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20261.9x their median

    Bitcoin's immune system is purging itself of cancerous cells.

    3592127218K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20261.8x their median

    Number of @CasaHODL clients who lost bitcoin while having a compromised COLDCARD in their multisig key set: 0.

    3301823340K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20261.7x their median

    You can't bluff your way into a successful UASF. Bitcoiners, take heed.

    3302313018K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 213 interactions against 531K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 1.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 29% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 10x its own typical post.

What is Jameson Lopp's engagement rate on X?
Jameson Lopp (@lopp) has an engagement rate of 0.04%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 531,201 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.04%, Jameson Lopp sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lopp have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lopp post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going