Back to @maimoto_k's profile

่ˆžๅ…ƒๅ•“ไป‹๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐ŸŒพใซใ˜ใ•ใ‚“ใ˜ engagement report

@maimoto_k - 556K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.212%
of 556K followers
Per impression
1.81%
65K views on a typical post
Reach
11.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 556K followers, an engagement rate of 0.212%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 3,848 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 65K times each, and 1.81% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 93K interactions, about 79x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ใซใ˜ใ‚ตใ‚ซใƒ•ใ‚งใ‚น, #ใซใ˜ใŸใพ, #ใซใ˜ใ•ใ‚“ใ˜ใƒฉใ‚ธใ‚ณใƒณใƒใƒˆใƒซ.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #ใซใ˜ใ‚ตใ‚ซใƒ•ใ‚งใ‚น, #ใซใ˜ใŸใพ, #ใซใ˜ใ•ใ‚“ใ˜ใƒฉใ‚ธใ‚ณใƒณใƒใƒˆใƒซ.

Compared with accounts its own size

่ˆžๅ…ƒๅ•“ไป‹๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐ŸŒพใซใ˜ใ•ใ‚“ใ˜'s engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,848 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.212%, ่ˆžๅ…ƒๅ•“ไป‹๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐ŸŒพใซใ˜ใ•ใ‚“ใ˜ sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,320 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.436%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.436%
p902.10%
p99160.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,320 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,750 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.436%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-4%100K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-3%93K
18:00 UTC-2%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%76K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%235K
Monday0%296K
Tuesday-3%292K
Wednesday-1%254K
Thursday-2%248K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 202679x their median

    #ไฟบใŒใ—ใใ‚Œใ†ใ„ใ  https://t.co/ABDEtRYvWa

    84K8.1K3012861.9M viewsView on X
  • May 20, 20256.8x their median

    ใ‚ถใƒณใ‚ฎใ‚จใƒ•ๅŒๆ„ใฎ็žฌ้–“ https://t.co/YMmFCcUejz

    6.2K1.8K26911.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.7x their median

    Bใƒใƒผใƒ ใฎใ‚นใƒญใƒผใ‚ฌใƒณใฏ ไธ€ไบบไธ€ๆฎบ ใงใ™ใ€‚ใ‚ˆใ‚ใ—ใใŠ้ก˜ใ„ใ—ใพใ™ใ€‚ #ใซใ˜ใ‚ตใ‚ซใƒ•ใ‚งใ‚น

    7.3K6094345352K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.8x their median

    ๆœ€้ซ˜ใฎใƒใƒผใƒ ใ ใฃใŸ ใ‚ใ‚ŠใŒใจใ†Bใƒใƒผใƒ  ใ‚ใ‚ŠใŒใจใ†้•ทๅฐพๆ™ฏ

    3.1K1717192K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.7x their median

    ใƒใ‚ฑใตใŸๅ›žใ‚Šใ‚„ใ™ใ„้ƒฝ้“ๅบœ็œŒใ‚’็Ÿฅใ‚ŠใŸใ„

    2.9K13111337369K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.5x their median

    https://t.co/bDAjalrTTm

    2.7K136124145K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.8x their median

    ๆœฌๆ—ฅใ‚ˆใ‚Š๏ผใซใ˜ใ•ใ‚“ใ˜ ็ผถใƒใƒƒใ‚ธใƒ“ใ‚นใ‚ฑใƒƒใƒˆ็ฌฌ3ๅผพใŒ็™บๅฃฒใ•ใ‚ŒใฆใŠใ‚Šใพใ™๏ผ ใชใ‚“ใ‹ใ‚„ใŸใ‚‰ใƒ“ใ‚ทใƒƒใจๆฑบใ‚ใฆใ„ใพใ™ใฎใงใฉใ†ใžใ‚ˆใ‚ใ—ใใŠ้ก˜ใ„ใ„ใŸใ—ใพใ™๏ผ https://t.co/bh5u2xgmlq #PR #ใซใ˜ใƒใƒณใƒ€ใ‚ค https://t.co/yIi2J2gnGt

    1.9K1741955K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.7x their median

    ไปŠๆ—ฅใฏ20ๆ™‚ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ‚ตใƒƒใ‚ซใƒผใŠใ˜ใ•ใ‚“ใ ใ‚ˆ Bใƒใƒผใƒ ใƒชใƒผใƒ€ใƒผใ ใ‚ˆ ใซใ˜ใ•ใ‚“ใ˜ใ‚’็‹ฉใฃใฆใ„ใใ‚ˆ #ใซใ˜ใ‚ตใ‚ซใƒ•ใ‚งใ‚น

    1.9K15713477K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    ไปŠๆ—ฅใฏ22ๆ™‚ใ‹ใ‚‰ใกใกใ’ใ‚„ใพใ„ใ‚‚ใจใŒใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ™ ไนณๆฏ›ๅฑฑใฎๅๅ‰ใ‚’ๅ–ใ‚Šๆˆปใ™ในใไปŠๆ—ฅใ‚‚้ ‘ๅผตใ‚Šใพใ™

    1.6K11140107K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 2026

    ใƒ—ใƒฌใƒŸใ‚ขใ€CLใงๆ—ฅๆœฌไบบGKใ‚นใ‚ฟใƒกใƒณใง่ฆ‹ใ‚‰ใ‚Œใ‚‹ๆ™‚ไปฃใŒๆฅใ‚‹ใฎใ‹ใ‚ˆใ‚ฉ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ

    1.3K3431115K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ใซใ˜ใ‚ตใ‚ซใƒ•ใ‚งใ‚น#ใซใ˜ใŸใพ#ใซใ˜ใ•ใ‚“ใ˜ใƒฉใ‚ธใ‚ณใƒณใƒใƒˆใƒซ#ใƒ‘ใƒฏใƒ—ใƒญ#ใƒ‘ใƒฏใƒ—ใƒญ2026

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 556K followers, an engagement rate of 0.212%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 3,848 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 65K times each, and 1.81% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 93K interactions, about 79x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ใซใ˜ใ‚ตใ‚ซใƒ•ใ‚งใ‚น, #ใซใ˜ใŸใพ, #ใซใ˜ใ•ใ‚“ใ˜ใƒฉใ‚ธใ‚ณใƒณใƒใƒˆใƒซ.

What is ่ˆžๅ…ƒๅ•“ไป‹๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐ŸŒพใซใ˜ใ•ใ‚“ใ˜'s engagement rate on X?
่ˆžๅ…ƒๅ•“ไป‹๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐ŸŒพใซใ˜ใ•ใ‚“ใ˜ (@maimoto_k) has an engagement rate of 0.212%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 556,444 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.212%, ่ˆžๅ…ƒๅ•“ไป‹๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐ŸŒพใซใ˜ใ•ใ‚“ใ˜ sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,320 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @maimoto_k have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,848 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @maimoto_k post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going