Back to @marcelvanhattem's profile

Marcel van Hattem engagement report

@marcelvanhattem - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.368%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
11.2%
43K views on a typical post
Reach
3.27%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.047%
20 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.23/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 4.8K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.368%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 11.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 4.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Marcel van Hattem's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.368%, Marcel van Hattem sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.435%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,071 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,527 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 20264.8x their median

    Juiz americano CONFIRMA: entrada de Filipe Martins nos EUA foi FRAUDADA. Gregory Presnell acaba de intimar o CBP americano para informar COMO esse crime foi cometido e QUEM cometeu essa fraude. A cobra vai fumar e Alexandre de Moraes vai dançar! https://t.co/jZB2IjW9Dd

    18K4.5K23971105K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.2x their median

    Justiça americana diz que é falso documento dos EUA usado pelo STF para prender Filipe Martins https://t.co/AyTwIjjhHu

    15K3.3K1.5K5601.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.9x their median

    Fui investigado e indiciado pela Polícia Federal do Lula por dizer a verdade. O Procurador-Geral da República me denunciou ao STF e agora aguardo para saber se Flávio Dino e sua turma me tornarão réu ou não. Tudo por dizer a verdade e denunciar abusos de autoridade. Este é o nível da tirania de Lula e do STF contra quem ousa enfrentá-los. Mas não me intimidarei, jamais! É também por isso que sou candidato ao Senado: para colocar um fim nesses abusos, é lá que precisamos atuar. Conto com você. Dia 4 de outubro, vote 300!

    15K3.6K1344274K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.0x their median

    Não sei, nunca vi, não tô sabendo... https://t.co/ZbQZFrpVqB

    11K3.0K1853455K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.9x their median

    Quem diz o que quer, ouve o que não quer. https://t.co/SIpYFqRfN5

    12K2.0K15621147K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.9x their median

    🚨 IDENTIFICAMOS O DELEGADO DO PIXULECO e descobrimos que ele esteve na seleta comitiva da primeira-dama Janja em Paris. Em 20 de agosto, na cidade de Natal, no Rio Grande do Norte, um delegado da Polícia Federal abordou manifestantes e “pediu” para que o Pixuleco, o famoso boneco do Lula vestido de presidiário, fosse esvaziado. Disse que a peça “poderia configurar crime contra a honra” do Lula. Quando perguntaram quem deu a ordem,ele respondeu: “Eu mesmo.” Ele só não conseguiu apreender o boneco porque o deputado Eliéser Girão, que também é general da reserva, estava no local e questionou a legalidade da abordagem da PF. Pois @a_investigacao_ identificou o delegado. Trata-se de Rolff Keven Santos Ferreira, coordenador de Doutrina e Capacitação da Diretoria de Proteção à Pessoa (DPP) — a mesma estrutura que participa da segurança do presidente. Antes de pressionar manifestantes em Natal, Rolff já tinha circulado no núcleo protocolar do Planalto: em 2024, integrou a comitiva oficial da primeira-dama Janja nas Olimpíadas de Paris. Ou seja, ele não era um agente qualquer. Era um coordenador da diretoria responsável por treinar as equipes de proteção presidencial. A gravação mostra o delegado tratando o Pixuleco — símbolo de protesto que circula no Brasil desde 2015 — como possível crime, sem mandado. A Investigação não para. Continuaremos expondo as ilegalidades e investigando os colaboracionistas do Regime. Leia a reportagem em https://t.co/1YenEnHE98

    10K3.4K17390300K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.8x their median

    Agora é 300!!! Começou, vamoooo! https://t.co/ZGKTs2E2ZQ

    12K1.4K1351270K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.8x their median

    Perguntaram há pouco como foi o Lula no JN. Respondi: roubou a cena.

    12K98722346113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.3x their median

    Toda vez que chove forte no RS, Lula foge. https://t.co/e240JxoLxm

    9.6K1.2K1221348K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.3x their median

    É impressionante como parte da imprensa ainda insiste em passar pano para ministros do Supremo e tratar abusos como se fossem normais. Eu não vou me abster de fazer perguntas incômodas nem de lembrar a responsabilidade de quem, por conveniência ou conivência, ajuda a normalizar os desmandos daqueles que passaram a se considerar intocáveis.

    8.8K1.8K2293481K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.8K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.368%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 11.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 4.8x its own typical post.

What is Marcel van Hattem's engagement rate on X?
Marcel van Hattem (@marcelvanhattem) has an engagement rate of 0.368%, based on the median interactions across 57 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,306,884 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.368%, Marcel van Hattem sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @marcelvanhattem have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @marcelvanhattem post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going