Back to @marcusyul's profile

marcus engagement report

@marcusyul - 536K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.042%
of 536K followers
Per impression
0.584%
39K views on a typical post
Reach
7.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
226
interactions (median)
Saved
0.15%
58 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 226 interactions against 536K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,792 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 0.584% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 148x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #capcut, #capcutai, #capcutdidthat.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #capcut, #capcutai, #capcutdidthat.

Compared with accounts its own size

marcus's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,792 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.042%, marcus sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 2026148x their median

    HAN CREADO UN CAPCUT GRATIS Y SIN MARCAS DE AGUA, Y YA TIENE 62K STARS EN GITHUB CapCut te mete marca de agua, te bloquea funciones y encima te cobra suscripción. Un grupo de devs se cansó y construyó la alternativa open source y gratuita. Se llama OpenCut. Te explico todo: Un editor de vídeo open source que están construyendo desde cero, con arquitectura basada en plugins. La idea: una alternativa real a CapCut, pero abierta. Sin marcas de agua, sin paywalls, sin suscripciones. Lo que crearon: → Editor completo con línea de tiempo y multipista → Plugins nativos para expandir lo que puede hacer → Una sola app para web, escritorio y móvil (núcleo en Rust) → MCP Server, automatizaciones y soporte para agentes de IA → Licencia MIT: puedes hacer lo que quieras con él Cómo instalarlo: → Clona el repo desde GitHub → Instala las dependencias → Ejecuta la versión clásica (disponible ya) → Sigue la nueva versión en https://t.co/wa5VTQYLn1 Es exactamente lo que CapCut debería haber sido desde el principio. Enlace abajo👇

    30K3.2K1671973.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20268.2x their median

    I ran the same task on Claude Code and DeepSeek's new agent harness. One cost $150. The other cost $2. Today we're launching https://t.co/twx6etZb3X (@agentsky_dev), the "OpenRouter for Agents" — one API → Claude Code, Codex, DeepSeek, Kimi, OpenCode, and every major agent in the cloud. And Agent Playground on top: race them on your own task, with your real tools (GitHub, Gmail, more), side by side in a browser: time, cost, tokens burnt. Guess which one was $2.

    1.2K2162301992.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.0x their median

    Este creador explica cómo factura 30,000$ al mes con un canal de YouTube sin rostro y sin tocar el editor de vídeo. Claude estudia a la competencia, reescribe el guión, genera los visuales y crea los vídeos. 🔖 Menos de 20 minutos para empezar a generar tus primeros ingresos. https://t.co/faNs05Oi7o

    52510831331K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.5x their median

    https://t.co/2396fF6YlN

    3641254733614K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.1x their median

    TUTORIAL COMPLETO DE YOUTUBE SHORTS EN 42 MINUTOS Cómo un chico en sus 20 pasó a ganar $100k al mes publicando shorts simples Encuentra el nicho. Publica sin mostrar la cara. Escala hasta los 6 dígitos al mes. 🔖 Guárdalo, te será muy útil https://t.co/Jk9CHrhbWi

    4184919057K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    We thought a regular progress update would be boring, so we figured we’d show you instead. https://t.co/618njJYIZc

    206445622340K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    A PE-backed healthcare company asked us to modernize their prior authorization automation on a ten-year platform with regulated patient data. The product roadmap called for a full platform rebuild with a new architecture, new data model, and new automation engine. They were skeptical of another automation overhaul. We proposed a proof of concept: one live payer portal, prove it works before building the product. We shipped a production browser extension in two months. Coordinators stopped bypassing the system. The bots ran headless browsers from a data center. Payers detected the IP and flagged it. When a bot hit MFA or a clinical question it couldn't answer, the session died. The coordinator filed a support ticket, waited for engineering to patch that specific workflow branch, and started the submission from scratch. Payer portals branch depending on procedure codes, clinical context, and plan requirements. The old system learned those paths one failure at a time. A coordinator would submit, the bot would break on a new branch, engineering would patch, and the next case would hit another branch nobody had mapped. The portal backlog never closed. We moved the automation into the coordinator's own browser. Same authenticated session they'd use for a manual submission. Payers see a normal login from a normal IP. When the automation needs help, the coordinator steps in and the run continues where it left off. Concept to production in two months with six engineers, HIPAA-hardened, PHI remediation across stored values and logs. Then we built Observe Mode. When a coordinator works a portal that doesn't have a script, the extension captures what they do. Those recordings become the foundation for the next automation. Coverage that builds from real workflows instead of breaking first and patching after. Ten years of payer workflow knowledge baked into the scripts. We migrated it into the new engine while the legacy platform kept running underneath. Build beside it, prove it works, and let the old system go when it's ready. That's how we modernize platforms that can't go down.

    134354220141K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    TENGO CLAUDE CODE, CODEX Y CURSOR CORRIENDO A LA VEZ, Y CADA UNO CON SUS PROPIAS REGLAS si usas varios coding agents ya sabes el lío: reglas, skills, hooks y correcciones repartidas entre todos, sin sincronizar nunca. cada agente termina siendo su propio grafo de dependencias, y nadie lo está vigilando. encontré @blumedotcodes, una app local que ve y mantiene ese grafo entero. → detecta cuando corriges a tu agente → convierte esa corrección en skill o regla → vigila varios agentes a la vez, no solo uno → todo corre en local, nada sale de tu máquina no reemplaza a tus agentes, corre al lado de ellos y mantiene el orden. gratis para descargar.

    1861921039K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    PERDISTE UN SÁBADO ENTERO POR UN "DÓNDE ESTÁ MI PEDIDO" Pasa en cualquier tienda de shopify. Preguntas repetidas, tickets que se acumulan, y tú contestando fuera de horario. Resolvas se conecta a tu soporte y resuelve solo: → Reembolsos y cambios dentro de tus límites → Respuesta en menos de 15 segundos → "Dónde está mi pedido" resuelto al momento → Tú decides los casos que se escapan Setup de 5 minutos, sin tocar nada de tu tienda. Enlace abajo a su waitlist :)

    165199036K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    Announcing the Lindy Chrome extension. Bring Lindy straight into your inbox to highlight your most important emails, draft replies backed by all your memories, and teach it how to label your email. Live now: https://t.co/av9senk60g https://t.co/Kfudarwt6b

    130152024192K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#capcut#capcutai#capcutdidthat#seedance25

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 226 interactions against 536K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,792 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 0.584% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 148x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #capcut, #capcutai, #capcutdidthat.

What is marcus's engagement rate on X?
marcus (@marcusyul) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 536,219 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.042%, marcus sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @marcusyul have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,792 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @marcusyul post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going