Back to @mariuvidal's profile

María Eugenia Vidal engagement report

@mariuvidal - 1.6M followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.027%
of 1.6M followers
Per impression
0.769%
57K views on a typical post
Reach
3.55%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
442
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 442 interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 3,881 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 0.769% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.55% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 59K interactions, about 135x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #leyyorden.

Compared with accounts its own size

María Eugenia Vidal's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,881 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.027%, María Eugenia Vidal sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 21, 2026135x their median

    "Rosalia" Porque a días de su show en el país, se sumó a la campaña anti-Argentina compartiendo un video de Mia Khalifa: trató a los argentinos de "perlas", que en su país significa sinvergüenza, vago, caradura, problemático o delincuente. https://t.co/J3odebLva7

    49K5.4K1.7K3.0K8.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 2026126x their median

    🇦🇷 "La IMAGEN de ARGENTINA es PATÉTICA". ‼️ "Ha hecho el RIDÍCULO". @jpedrerol alucina con los medios argentinos y sus reflexiones tras la derrota en la final. https://t.co/i5Am4tFYIQ

    47K5.5K2.8K6614.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202623x their median

    Nos cansamos de decirlo. Era una pelea de cartón. Ego, vanidad y un poco de lapicera. Al final terminan juntos. Porque son lo mismo. Emisión. Inflación. Corrupción. Devaluación. Expropiación. Persecución. Desinversión. Cepo. Brecha. Plan Platita. Sira. Ley de góndolas. Ley de alquileres. Retenciones. Frente para la Victoria. Frente de Todos. Unión por la Patria. Fuerza Patria. Cambian el nombre porque no pueden cambiar el prontuario.

    7.6K2.2K0167155K viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 202618x their median

    LA HIPOCRESÍA DE MARÍA EUGENIA VIDAL La exgobernadora bonaerense, María Eugenia Vidal, dedicó su última entrevista no para hablar de las reformas que este Gobierno está aprobando en el Congreso con apoyo del PRO, sino para atacar al actual Jefe de Gabinete, Manuel Adorni, diciendo que en su gobierno “nunca se hubiera permitido algo así”. Esta hipocresía marca una era de la política argentina: Vidal se cree con autoridad moral para dar lecciones de ética y fustigar a otros por falta de transparencia, mientras su propio expediente la deja completamente en ridículo. Ella misma fue denunciada por enriquecimiento ilícito por comprar un departamento lujoso en el barrio porteño de Recoleta, con un patrimonio declarado muy por debajo de la realidad. En 2018 también fue imputada por los aportantes truchos, irregularidades graves en el financiamiento de su campaña. Las causas avanzaron y terminaron con sobreseimiento. Pero mientras tanto, a nadie ni se le ocurrió pedirle la renuncia, y primó la presunción de inocencia. En una reciente entrevista dijo: “Mauricio (Macri) no lo hubiese permitido”, pero a pesar de la gravedad de las denuncias en su contra, el entonces Presidente Mauricio Macri nunca le pidió la renuncia y siguió en su cargo. Esa es su idea de ética: sobreactuar indignación cuando se trata de otros, pero impunidad total cuando le toca a ella. El doble estándar es grotesco.

    6.0K1.4K470104345K viewsView on X
  • May 27, 202612x their median

    SCHOKLENDER REVELÓ QUE ANÍBAL FERNÁNDEZ LE PAGABA A UN ABOGADO PARA INVENTAR DENUNCIAS CONTRA EL PRO Sergio Schoklender declaró este miércoles en la causa Sueños Compartidos, que investiga irregularidades en la construcción de viviendas sociales. El abogado involucrado es el cordobés Eduardo Barcesat, especializado en Derechos Humanos. Según su relato, esas acciones habrían incluido el uso de la Fundación Madres de Plaza de Mayo para financiar la estrategia. Testimonio de Sergio Schoklender "Él [Barcesat] quería que le proponga comenzar a realizar una serie de denuncias permanentes contra funcionarios del PRO, pero necesitaba financiamiento". "[Barcesat] la convenció a Hebe, que habló con Anibal y se armó un centro de investigación dentro de la universidad (de las Madres de Plaza de Mayo), que recibía un subsidio de Aníbal Fernández que iba directo a Barcesat, que tenía solamente la función de hacer nuevas denuncias contra algún funcionario del PRO". (+) en Clarín: https://t.co/RQjZNQ5vhZ

    4.2K2.1K225172237K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 202615x their median

    Vidal le pidió la renuncia Adorni por viajar a Punta del Este. Saben dónde es esto? En el VIP del aeropuerto de Punta. Toda la vida viviendo del Estado. https://t.co/9nA66kOmzo

    5.3K84428245566K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202611x their median

    AHORA. Aprobamos una ley para que los jubilados de la Ciudad, que cobren hasta 2.5 haberes mínimos, puedan viajar gratis en subte directamente con su DNI. Se dan de alta, pasan el DNI por el molinete. Simple.

    3.9K562457134431K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20269.3x their median

    El PRO ya demostró que sabe gobernar. Ahora tiene que volver a ser la alternativa para la Argentina que viene. Tenemos equipo, experiencia y estamos listos para dar el próximo paso. https://t.co/eGsOAxEfSA

    1.3K3762.2K218360K viewsView on X
  • Jun 8, 20268.0x their median

    Hay un próximo paso para dar: bajar impuestos, abrir mercados, invertir en infraestructura y erradicar la corrupción. La experiencia de Mauricio Macri le da a los argentinos la posibilidad de que la alternativa al gobierno no sea más kirchnerismo. https://t.co/Ft8eCUCf7A

    1.4K4491.6K82154K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20264.1x their median

    Las familias porteñas podrán refinanciar sus deudas de tarjetas de crédito y préstamos en mora con más plazo y una tasa de interés fija. Es un alivio para la clase media que trabaja, se esfuerza y quiere ponerse al día. Las nuevas alternativas de refinanciación estarán disponibles a través del Banco Ciudad y de las entidades financieras que decidan adherirse. Esta fue una propuesta que trabajamos en conjunto entre el Poder Ejecutivo y la Legislatura para convertirla en una ley financieramente viable.

    794255645116180K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#leyyorden

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 442 interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 3,881 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 0.769% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.55% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 59K interactions, about 135x its own typical post.

What is María Eugenia Vidal's engagement rate on X?
María Eugenia Vidal (@mariuvidal) has an engagement rate of 0.027%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,618,289 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.027%, María Eugenia Vidal sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mariuvidal have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,881 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @mariuvidal post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going