Back to @maurocezar's profile

Mauro Cezar engagement report

@maurocezar - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 126 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.032%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
0.979%
41K views on a typical post
Reach
3.26%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
401
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
6.8/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 401 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 126 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 0.979% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 126 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 80x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #futebol, #brasileirao, #flamengo.

Measured over 126 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #futebol, #brasileirao, #flamengo.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mauro Cezar's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.032%, Mauro Cezar sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 202680x their median

    The members of Atlético de Madrid's Board of Directors have unanimously expressed their absolute support for the club's decision to not negotiate the transfer of Julián Alvarez to FC Barcelona. The members of the Board of Directors acknowledge that "Atlético de Madrid is open to standard transfer market negotiations when conducted in a professional, ethical and respectful manner. We fully stand behind the club’s previously communicated position that FC Barcelona failed to meet these requirements and, as a result, there will not be any negotiation and there is zero consideration of an Alvarez transfer to Barcelona.” Atlético de Madrid trust that our player will understand the decision and will remain focused on helping the club achieve its goals, just as he has done during the two seasons he has been defending our colors.

    24K3.4K3.4K1.6K2.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202671x their median

    REPARAÇÃO! 🚨 MV Bill relembra quando deu uma verdadeira aula sobre cotas raciais no Altas Horas e ficou vetado por anos de entrar na Rede Globo! 📺✊ https://t.co/4ehQL3PWwC

    25K3.2K366180615K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202664x their median

    🇧🇷🕺 Just 𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗞 at the style of football Flamengo are playing in Brazil. https://t.co/bbtS09tuvK

    24K1.7K11399473K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202635x their median

    Verdadeira aula do Léo Ortiz sobre o q vem acontecendo em diversos jogos do Flamengo no campeonato! Agora é sair do discurso e por em prática! https://t.co/snRTC3d04e

    13K1.0K152149633K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202632x their median

    a noite que eu identifiquei a finada joia Pedro Lucas nos melhores momentos do jogo do flamengo. histórico. https://t.co/PTu8mYjdYm

    13K24910953766K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202630x their median

    Que festa estranha com gente esquisita é essa do Peão de Barretos. Olha a quantidade de lixo! https://t.co/hL6css60tl

    9.3K4921.3K7852.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202625x their median

    Um repórter pergunta a Aurélio Buarque de Holanda, criador do dicionário AURÉLIO, qual é a palavra mais bonita da língua português? © Arquivo Nacional https://t.co/Yududckm09

    9.0K8375377226K viewsView on X
  • Apr 17, 202423x their median

    Zico era craque e líder. Líder mesmo. Entre todos os jogos nos quais ele comandou técnica e espiritualmente o Flamengo a grandes vitórias, para mim o mais marcante é a final do Brasileiro de 1983, quando era preciso derrotar o forte time do Santos por pelo menos dois gols. Foi 3 a 0. O @Galinho1953 estava negociado com a Udinese, mas a torcida não sabia. Tinha problemas físicos, mas foi a campo mesmo assim, marcou no primeiro minuto e, note, antes e depois do gol ele orienta Baltazar, pede garra e concentração aos companheiros e repete os gestos após o 1 a 0 no placar. Ídolo demais. Zico era foda, meu irmão, era foda!

    8.3K69111136.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202612x their median

    A reação de Pulgar diz tudo. Estava 0-0 e Pedro, com todo recurso técnico que possui, fez isso. Ele joga muito, e não foi displicente e preciosista. Em geral ele é!!!! https://t.co/wTQ2Neqis1

    4.6K165130229K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202610x their median

    BERNARDO MELLO FRANCO | Esvaziado pelos ausentes e avacalhado pelos presentes, o debate da Band foi o pior encontro de presidenciáveis transmitido pela TV brasileira desde 1989. À frente nas pesquisas, Lula e Flávio Bolsonaro já haviam informado que não compareceriam. No domingo, Romeu Zema surpreendeu ao se juntar ao boicote. Dos seis convidados, restaram três, que por pouco não se reduziram a dois. Bernardo Mello Franco (@bernardo.mello.franco) traz mais detalhes. #JornalOGlobo #Eleicoes2026

    3.7K24116619247K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#futebol#brasileirao#flamengo#vasco#abreaspas

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 401 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 126 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 0.979% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 126 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 80x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #futebol, #brasileirao, #flamengo.

What is Mauro Cezar's engagement rate on X?
Mauro Cezar (@maurocezar) has an engagement rate of 0.032%, based on the median interactions across 126 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,256,399 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.032%, Mauro Cezar sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @maurocezar have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @maurocezar post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 6.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going